It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Data sharing is increasingly recommended as a means of accelerating science by facilitating collaboration, transparency, and reproducibility. While few oppose data sharing philosophically, a range of barriers deter most researchers from implementing it in practice. To justify the significant effort required for sharing data, funding agencies, institutions, and investigators need clear evidence of benefit. Here, using the International Neuroimaging Data-sharing Initiative, we present a case study that provides direct evidence of the impact of open sharing on brain imaging data use and resulting peer-reviewed publications. We demonstrate that openly shared data can increase the scale of scientific studies conducted by data contributors, and can recruit scientists from a broader range of disciplines. These findings dispel the myth that scientific findings using shared data cannot be published in high-impact journals, suggest the transformative power of data sharing for accelerating science, and underscore the need for implementing data sharing universally.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA; Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, USA
2 Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
3 Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA; Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires, INSERM U1001, Dpt Frontières du Vivant et de l′Apprendre, University Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
5 Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, USA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hassenfeld Childrenʼs Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
6 Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, USA
7 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hassenfeld Childrenʼs Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
8 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Research Center for Lifespan Development of Mind and Brain (CLIMB) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory for Brain and Education Sciences, Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning, China