It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) by selecting lines prior to field phenotyping using genotyping data has the potential to enhance the rate of genetic gains. Genotype × environment (G × E) interaction inclusion in GS models can improve prediction accuracy hence aid in selection of lines across target environments. Phenotypic data on 320 chickpea breeding lines for eight traits for three seasons at two locations were recorded. These lines were genotyped using DArTseq (1.6 K SNPs) and Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS; 89 K SNPs). Thirteen models were fitted including main effects of environment and lines, markers, and/or naïve and informed interactions to estimate prediction accuracies. Three cross-validation schemes mimicking real scenarios that breeders might encounter in the fields were considered to assess prediction accuracy of the models (CV2: incomplete field trials or sparse testing; CV1: newly developed lines; and CV0: untested environments). Maximum prediction accuracies for different traits and different models were observed with CV2. DArTseq performed better than GBS and the combined genotyping set (DArTseq and GBS) regardless of the cross validation scheme with most of the main effect marker and interaction models. Improvement of GS models and application of various genotyping platforms are key factors for obtaining accurate and precise prediction accuracies, leading to more precise selection of candidates.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Jarquin, Diego 2
; Singh, Muneendra K 1 ; Gaur, Pooran M 1
; Bharadwaj, Chellapilla 3 ; Rathore, Abhishek 1
; Howard, Reka 2 ; Srinivasan, Samineni 1 ; Jain, Ankit 1 ; Garg, Vanika 1 ; Kale, Sandip 4 ; Chitikineni, Annapurna 1 ; Tripathi, Shailesh 3 ; Jones, Elizabeth 5 ; Robbins, Kelly R 5 ; Crossa, Jose 6
; Varshney, Rajeev K 1
1 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
2 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
3 Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Delhi, India
4 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India; IPK-Gatersleben, Gatersleben, Germany
5 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
6 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, Mexico




