Adipokines demonstrate the interacting influence of central obesity with other cardiometabolic risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Hong Kong Chinese adults

Abstract

Objective

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) or prediabetes is a complex disorder that is defined by a clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors, including obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Among cardiometabolic risk factors, central obesity plays a key role in the development of MetS through alterations in the secretion of adipokines and interacts with other MetS risk factors to unfavorably influence overall cardiometabolic risk. Obesity has grasped epidemic proportions in Asia, which has the highest number of people with diabetes in the world. But, the importance of central obesity in the clustering of all four MetS risk factors or vice versa in predicting severity of MetS has not yet been investigated in Asian population. Therefore, the present study examined the influence of central obesity on circulating levels of adipokines through its interaction with the clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors of MetS including hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidemia and hypertension in Hong Kong Chinese adults.

Subjects

Blood samples from 83 Hong Kong Chinese adults, who were previously screened for MetS according to the guideline of the United States National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel Adult Treatment Panel III criteria were selected. Insulin and adipokines, including visfatin, chemerin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), resistin, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), leptin and adiponectin were assessed.

Results

The interacting effect of central obesity with all of the other four MetS risk factors increased the proinflammatory status of adipokines (TNF-α, leptin) and decreased the anti-inflammatory status of adipokine (adiponectin).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the inflammatory status of MetS may be more severe in the presence of central obesity. Adipokines, as biomarkers for pathophysiological changes, may help to improve early patient identification and to predict MetS-associated morbidity and mortality.

About the Authors:

Rashmi Supriya

Contributed equally to this work with: Rashmi Supriya, Bjorn T. Tam

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Bjorn T. Tam

Contributed equally to this work with: Rashmi Supriya, Bjorn T. Tam

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Angus P. Yu

Roles Data curation

Affiliation: School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

Paul H. Lee

Roles Formal analysis

Affiliation: School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Christopher W. Lai

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Kenneth K. Cheng

Roles Formal analysis

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Sonata Y. Yau

Roles Formal analysis

Affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Lawrence W. Chan

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Benjamin Y. Yung

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis

Affiliation: Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Sinead Sheridan

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

Parco M. Siu

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-5058

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a complex disorder that is defined by the clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors, including obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, hypertension, and insulin resistance that together, culminate in an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. Obesity, and in particular central obesity, plays an important role in the development of MetS [2] and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disorders, T2D and certain cancers [3]. The prognostic importance of central obesity has been recognized by the International Diabetes Federation which includes central obesity as the sine qua non for diagnosing MetS [4]. Central obesity has been associated with an increased risk of CVD in subjects with or without MetS [5]. Intra-abdominal adiposity interacts with other MetS risk factors to unfavorably influence overall cardiometabolic risk. The Quebec Health Survey analyzed the relationship between indices of obesity, blood pressure (BP) and hyperinsulinemia and found that variations in waist circumference explained the associations among obesity, hypertension and insulin resistance [6]. Moreover, intra-abdominal adiposity has been allied with adverse changes in lipid profile in older people before and after adjustment for overall adiposity [7].

Obesity has grasped epidemic proportions in Asia. Asian countries are faced with serious burdens of obesity-related disorders such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases, which develop at a younger age than in Western populations [8]. For instance, review data in epidemiologic trends revealed that people of Asian ancestry are at higher risk of developing T2D and are more likely to develop obesity-related diseases even at a lower body mass index (BMI) as compared to Europeans [6]. At present, >60% of the world’s diabetic population resides in Asian countries [9]. The higher risk of diabetes in Asians (especially South Asians) may be partly attributed to the fact that they are more central obese but have less muscle, which together cause insulin resistance [10]. Relatively few cross-sectional studies conducted in Hong Kong and Taiwanese populations have shown that central obesity is an independent determinant of insulin resistance and other metabolic risk factors. On the other hand, numerous studies have shown that, while central obesity is important, it is not an essential component of predicting T2D or CVD incidence, especially in Asian populations [11,12]. For instance, the incidence of T2D with or without central obesity was similar in Chinese hypertensive individuals (n = 595) with the same number of MetS risk factors [11]. Another study conducted in Japanese Americans (n = 116) reported that the presence of MetS independently predicted the development of T2D, irrespective of the presence of central obesity [12]. Moreover, non-obese people with ≥ 3 MetS risk factors have been shown to have an equal or slightly higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and renal dysfunction than obese people with ≥ 3 MetS risk factors [13,14]. Nonetheless, these findings are difficult to interpret as the two or more MetS risk factors other than central obesity in the selection of their subjects with MetS was not specified. Interestingly, interventions directed solely to only one of the MetS risk factors in non-obese people at risk of CVD have been proposed to have relatively less beneficial effects on CVD risk reduction. For example, interventions directed solely to lowering blood pressure have been shown to have relatively little beneficial effect reducing risk of ischemic heart diseases due to the presence of hyperinsulinemia with hypertension [15]. In contrast, in the Copenhagen Male Study (n = 5249, mean age = 48 years), it was reported that the dyslipidemia was an important risk factor of ischemic heart disease in individuals with MetS [16]. The same research group also found that BP level was less predictive of the risk of ischemic heart disease in individuals (n = 2906 men, mean age 63 years) with dyslipidemia in MetS compared to those without dyslipidemia [17]. While the aforementioned studies indicate that in non-obese individuals with MetS targeting all of the four MetS risk factors may be important to prevent CVD or T2D risk, the importance of central obesity in the clustering of all four MetS risk factors or vice versa in predicting severity of MetS has not yet been investigated.

Obesity occurs in association with the enlargement of white adipose tissue and is often emphasised in the pathogenesis of MetS [4,18,19]. Specifically, excess intra-abdominal obesity has the potential to influence cardiometabolic risk directly, through alternations in the secretion of adipokines [20]. Adipose tissue is primarily composed of a stromal vascular fraction and adipocytes. The stromal vascular fraction consists of preadipocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and immune cells, including B cells, T cells, and macrophages [21] that play critical roles in various stages of obesity. In a healthy state, adipocytes and M2 macrophages secrete adiponectin and interleukin-10 (IL-10), which assist in anti-inflammatory regulation and tissue repair [22,23]. On the other hand, during the preliminary stage of obesity, the positive energy balance increases the size of adipocytes. These enlarged adipocytes secrete pro-inflammatory adipokines, such as leptin [24], interleukin-6 (IL-6) [25], tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [26], chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) [27], and chemerin, which enhance M1 macrophage chemotaxis. In advanced stages of obesity, the obese adipose tissue activates CD8+ T cells, which recruit monocytes and stimulate the pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages in the adipose tissue respectively. Subsequently, large numbers of migrated M1 macrophages suppress the anti-inflammatory effects of M2 macrophages, promote systemic inflammation, contributing to MetS [28,29].

Fluctuations in circulating adipokines linked to MetS have been reported in Asian populations [30–32]. Researchers suggested that the aggregation of MetS risk factors decreases serum adiponectin level and increases leptin and female RBP-4 levels. Intriguingly, adipokines were considerably related to MetS component aggregation [33]. Studies suggested that adipokines may be the main factors involved in the pathogenesis of MetS in Asian populations and may serve as early therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for the development of MetS [33]. A study reported that individuals with elevated levels of more than two pro-inflammatory adipokines had a higher MetS prevalence compared to those individuals with elevated levels of less than two pro-inflammatory adipokines [30]. Additionally, individuals with reduced levels of anti-inflammatory adipokines had a higher prevalence of MetS compared to those with elevated levels of anti-inflammatory adipokines [30]. In another study, the prevalence of MetS was 1.49 times higher in individuals with low adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory adipokine, and high retinol binding protein 4, a pro-inflammatory adipokine, compared to individuals with low retinol binding protein 4 and high adiponectin [34]. Thus, a single adipokine may not induce MetS but the interaction between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines contributes to systemic metabolic abnormalities while more importantly, increases in perivascular and visceral obesity disrupts the equilibrium between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines.

The importance of controlling adipokines-induced inflammation in MetS patients to prevent CVD risk has been suggested in Asian and non-Asian populations [35]. Central obesity has a potentially unifying pathogenetic role that is strongly associated with inflammation and oxidative stress leading to MetS [36]. Biomarkers for these clinical and pathophysiological changes have strong potential to improve early patient identification and predict MetS-associated morbidity and mortality. We hypothesised that central obesity plays a unique role in mediating circulatory levels of adipokines through its interaction with the clustering of the other four MetS cardiometabolic risk factors, including hypertriglyceridemia, reduced HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and high fasting glucose. The present study was specifically designed to examine the importance of central obesity on circulating levels of adipokines in the clustering of all of the other four metabolic risk factors in an Asian population.

Materials and methods

MetS risk factors data and serum samples of Hong Kong Chinese adults of both sexes (N = 83, mean±SD age = 56±9.1) were retrieved from a total of 1,492 archived blood samples of participants screened for MetS parameters defined by NCEP-ATP III [22]. In this study, inclusion of subjects was based on 4 groups: 1) subjects with none of the NCEP-ATP III-defined MetS cardiometabolic risk factors, 2) subjects with only central obesity, 3) subjects without central obesity and with the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors, and 4) subjects with all five cardiometabolic risk factors of MetS. We adopted a 2 x 2 factorial design with central obesity and/or 4 other MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (high systolic and diastolic BP, elevated fasting blood glucose, high triglycerides, and low HDL). All subjects were screened for MetS according to the diagnostic guideline of the NCEP-ATP III criteria [37]. People diagnosed with MetS had more than two of following characteristics: (1) central obesity (waist circumference exceeds 90 or 80 cm for Asian male and female, respectively), (2) hypertension (systolic pressure equals or exceed 130 mmHg, or diastolic pressure equals or exceeds 85 mmHg), (3) elevated blood glucose (fasting glucose level equals or exceeds 5.5 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]), (4) elevated plasma triglycerides (level equals or exceeds 1.70 mmol/L [150 mg/dL]), and (5) low level of HDL-C (level equals or is less than 1.0 mmol/L [40 mg/dL] for male and 1.3 mmol/L [50 mg/dL] for female) are regarded as MetS positive. Participants with severe or acute CVD, post-stroke, neuromusculoskeletal illness, dementia or mental disorders, acute medical illness, symptomatic heart or lung diseases, osteoarthritis or pulmonary illness, severe rheumatoid arthritis, smoker and participants who were immobile, or under treatment for metabolic abnormalities were excluded from the study. Subject participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained before this study. Human research ethics approval was provided by the Human Subjects Ethics Subcommittee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20150205001). A flowchart explaining the study procedure is presented in Fig 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Flowchart of the study design.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.g001

Selection of subjects and group assignment

In this study, “4RF” was used to identify the subjects with the clustering of all 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (i.e., elevated BP, increased fasting glucose, increased blood triglycerides, and reduced HDL). Subjects without the clustering of all 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors were identified as "N4RF”. In addition, central obesity was specifically investigated as an independent factor. Subjects with central obesity were identified as "O", whereas subjects without central obesity were indicated as "NO”. All subjects were divided into 4 groups including subjects with none of the MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_NO; n = 20), subjects without the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors but with central obesity (N4RF_O; n = 35), subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors but without central obesity (4RF_NO; n = 9), and subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors and central obesity (4RF_O; n = 19).

Measurements of cardiometabolic risk factors of MetS

All MetS diagnostic parameters were measured by trained research personnel. For central obesity, waist circumference was measured using inelastic measuring tape on the bare skin region between the lowest rib and superior border of the iliac crest. Systolic and diastolic BP was measured using an electronic BP monitor (Accutorr Plus, Datascope) over the brachial artery region on the right arm after 5 minutes of rest, with the arm supported at the level of the heart using an appropriately sized cuff. Fasting venous blood samples were collected after at least 10 hours of fasting by certified phlebotomists. Fasting blood glucose, blood triglycerides, and blood HDL-cholesterol were determined using an automatic clinical chemistry analyser (Architect CI8200, Abbott Diagnostics) in an accredited medical laboratory. A detailed explanation of the methods used for the assessment of MetS cardiometabolic risk factors has been previously described [18].

Measurements of adipokines and insulin

Commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were used to perform the biochemical measurements of adipokines and insulin according to the manufacturer’s instructions (visfatin kit was from BioVision; chemerin, PAI-1, resistin, CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and TNF-α kits were from R & D; leptin, adiponectin and insulin kits were from Thermo Fisher Scientific). The coefficient of variability (CV) for the ELISA kits were shown as follows: visfatin (intra-assay: 4.4–8%; inter-assay: 8.2%), chemerin (intra-assay: 3.9%; inter-assay: 7.3%), PAI-1 (intra-assay: 6.8%; inter-assay: 7%), resistin (intra-assay: 4.7%; inter-assay: 8.4%), CCL-2 (intra-assay: 5%; inter-assay: 5.1%), IL-6 (intra-assay: 2.6%; inter-assay: 4.5%), IL-8 (intra-assay: 4.7–6.7%; inter-assay: 5.8–7.7%), IL-10 (intra-assay: 3.7%; inter-assay: 6.9%), TNF-α (intra-assay: 4.9–7.8%; inter-assay: 4.7%-5.8%), leptin (intra-assay: 3.9%; inter-assay: 5.3%), adiponectin (intra-assay: 3.8%; inter-assay: 5.5%), and insulin (intra-assay: 4.8%-6%; inter-assay: 8.1% to 9%). All measurements were performed in duplicates or triplicates. Seven controls (one blank, two at lower concentrations, two at medium concentrations, and two at higher concentrations) were also quantified in duplicates to check for the reproducibility of measurements and confirm acceptable reproducibility.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk test was adopted to check the distribution of the data. The data of all adipokines and insulin followed non-normal distribution. Therefore, generalised estimating equation was adopted to analyse the data, where the adipokines and insulin were considered as dependent variables. Central obesity and the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors were considered as the two independent factors for calculating the interaction effect. Interaction effect between central obesity and the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors on adipokines was also analysed by adjusting age and sex as covariates. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc tests with Dunn-Bonferroni correction were used to analyse multiple group-wise comparisons and baseline comparisons. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to examine the correlations between the peptide concentrations and the MetS parameters. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05 with confidence intervals of 95%. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22 for Windows.

Results

Comparison of participant baseline characteristics

No significant differences were observed in sex and age among all the four groups. Baseline comparisons of all the five MetS risk factors between groups were also made. The summary of the participant characteristics is presented in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of sex, age and cardiometabolic risk factors in the following 4 groups: 1) subjects with none of the cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_NO; n = 20), 2) subjects with only central obesity without the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_O; n = 35), 3) subjects without central obesity but with the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_NO; n = 9), and 4) subjects with all five MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_O; n = 19).

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.t001

Circulatory levels of TNF-α and leptin exacerbated, and adiponectin decreased in people with central obesity and the clustering of other 4 MetS risk factors

Interaction effects between central obesity and the clustering of the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors were found for TNF-α (Wald chi square = 5.47, P = 0.019; Fig 2A), leptin (Wald chi square = 4.92, P = 0.027; Fig 2B) and adiponectin (Wald chi square = 9.17, P = 0.002; Fig 2C). After adjusting for age and sex as covariates, the interaction effect was still significant for TNF-α, leptin and adiponectin.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. The interaction of central obesity with the clustering of the other 4 MetS risk factors on adipokines.

The line graphs represent the direction and slope of interaction effect of central obesity and the clustering of the other 4 MetS risk factors (high fasting blood glucose, high triglycerides, low HDL and high systolic and diastolic BP) on adipokines including TNF-α (A), leptin (B) and adiponectin (C) in Hong Kong Chinese women categorized into four groups: 1) subjects with none of the cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_NO; n = 20), 2) subjects with only central obesity without the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_O; n = 35), 3) subjects without central obesity but with the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_NO; n = 9), and 4) subjects with all five MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_O; n = 19). Data are expressed in estimated marginal means. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.g002

Furthermore, the four-group comparisons indicated that the 4RF_O group had a 74% higher TNF-α level (mean difference = 92 pg/ml, P = 0.048), 101.3% higher leptin level (mean difference = 8 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and 50% lower adiponectin level (mean difference = - 6.2 μg/ml, P < 0.001) than the N4RF_NO group (i.e., difference between central obese subjects with 4RF and non-central obese subjects without 4RF). The 4RF_O group showed a 122% higher TNF-α level (mean difference = 118.4 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and 35.3% lower adiponectin level (mean difference = - 3.4 μg/ml, P = 0.006) compared with the N4RF_O group (i.e., difference between the presence and the absence of the clustering of 4 cardiometabolic risk factors in central obese subjects). The 4RF_O had a 133% higher leptin level (mean difference = 9.2 ng/ml, P = 0.023) compared with the 4RF_NO group (i.e., the difference between central obesity and non-central obesity in the 4RF subjects). The 4RF_NO group had a 57% lower adiponectin level (mean difference = - 7.1 μg/ml, P < 0.001) than the N4RF_NO group (i.e., the difference between the presence and the absence of the clustering of 4 cardiometabolic risk factors in non-central obese subjects) (Table 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Table represents the serum concentrations of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines and insulin hormone in the following 4 groups: 1) subjects with none of the cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_NO; n = 20), 2) subjects with only central obesity without the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_O; n = 35), 3) subjects without central obesity but with the other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_NO; n = 9), and 4) subjects with all five MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (4RF_O; n = 19).

The five MetS cardiometabolic risk factors include central obesity, high fasting blood glucose, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol and high systolic and diastolic BP. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [X1 (lower bound), X3 (upper bound)]. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.t002

Circulatory levels of insulin, chemerin, IL-6 and PAI-1 exacerbated in people with only central obesity

The main effects of central obesity were observed on insulin (Wald chi square = 17.4, P < 0.001, Fig 3A), chemerin (Wald chi square = 4.7, P = 0.031, Fig 3B), IL-6 (Wald chi square = 7.6, P = 0.001, Fig 3C), and PAI-1 (Wald chi square = 5.9, P = 0.016, Fig 3D). We found increases (mean difference ± standard error) in insulin (78.5 ± 18.8 pg/ml), chemerin (117.2 ± 54.2 ng/ml), PAI-1 (604.7 ± 250.1 pg/ml) and IL-6 (7.7 ± 2.8 pg/ml) levels in obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects (Fig 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Main effect of obesity on adipokines.

The line graphs (A-D) represent the means of insulin, chemerin, IL-6, and PAI-1 of subjects without central obesity (n = 29) versus subjects with central obesity (n = 54) irrespective of the presence of the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors (high fasting blood glucose, high triglycerides, low HDL and high systolic and diastolic BP). The data are expressed as the mean ± 1 standard deviation. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.g003

Circulatory levels of insulin, chemerin, IL-8 and Visfatin exacerbated in individuals with only the clustering of other 4 MetS risk factors

The main effects of the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors were observed on insulin (Wald chi square = 15.1, P < 0.001, Fig 4A), chemerin (Wald chi square = 32.3, P < 0.001 Fig 4B), IL-8 (Wald chi square = 10.4, P = 0.001, Fig 4C), and visfatin (Wald chi square = 7.6, P = 0.006, Fig 4D). We found increases (mean difference ± standard error) in insulin (73 ± 18.8 pg/ml), chemerin (30.8 ± 54.2 ng/ml), IL-8 (91.3 ± 28.3 pg/ml) and visfatin (677.7 ± 245.6 pg/ml) levels in subjects with the clustering of all 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors compared to subjects without the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (Fig 4A, 4B, 4C & 4D).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Main effect of the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors on adipokines.

The line graphs (A-D) represent the means of insulin, chemerin, IL-8, and visfatin of subjects without the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors (high fasting blood glucose, high triglycerides, low HDL and high systolic and diastolic BP) (n = 46) versus subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors (n = 37) irrespective of the presence or absence of central obesity. The data are expressed as the mean ± 1 standard deviation. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.g004

Correlation between MetS risks factors and adipokines

Chemerin (R = 0.62), insulin (R = 0.53), visfatin (R = 0.39), PAI-1(R = 0.34), leptin (R = 0.27) and resistin (R = 0.14) were positively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = - 0.69) and IL-10 (R = - 0.024) were negatively correlated with fasting glucose level. Insulin (R = 0.53), chemerin (R = 0.49), PAI-1(R = 0.44), leptin (R = 0.33), visfatin (R = 0.30), TNF-α (R = 0.18), and IL-10 (R = 0.13) were positively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = - 0.48) was negatively correlated with waist circumference. Chemerin (R = - 0.59), TNF-α (R = - 0.44), insulin (R = - 0.42), visfatin (R = - 0.31), PAI-1 (R = - 0.24), and resistin (R = - 0.23) were negatively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = 0.74) was positively correlated with HDL-cholesterol. Chemerin (R = 0.58), insulin (R = 0.44), visfatin (R = 0.41) and IL-10 (R = 0.038) were positively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = - 0.62) was negatively correlated with triglycerides. Chemerin (R = 0.30) and insulin (R = 0.29) were positively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = - 0.48) was negatively correlated with systolic BP. Insulin (R = 0.27) was positively correlated whereas adiponectin (R = -0.28) was negatively correlated with diastolic BP (S1 Fig).

Discussion

Metabolic and cardiovascular complications are major obesity-associated burdens, and thus recognising obese people at threat for MetS is a foremost healthcare priority. The enduring worldwide obesity epidemic is a significant threat to the population and healthcare systems owing to the related morbidity and high treatment costs [38]. The prevalence of obesity has been increased manifold in most of the Asian countries in the past few decades [39–42]. Western Pacific region and South East Asia are faced with widespread diseases associated with obesity such as diabetes and CVD [42]. Some countries like Indonesia and Vietnam are in the early stages of development of diseases associated with obesity while others like Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, and Japan are at more advanced stages [8]. Therefore, the present study was designed to examine the interaction of central obesity with the clustering of the other 4 MetS risk factors (including high BP, high triglycerides, high fasting blood glucose and reduced HDL cholesterol) on circulatory proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines in Hong Kong Chinese adults. Our results indicated that the interaction effects between central obesity and the clustering of other 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors existed for TNF-α, adiponectin and leptin. TNF-α increased, and adiponectin decreased in centrally obese subjects that exhibited a clustering of 4 risk factors compared to central obese subjects without this clustering. Leptin was increased in centrally obese subjects, with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors compared to subjects without the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors. For subjects with the clustering of 4 risk factors, leptin was increased in centrally obese subjects when compared to non-centrally obese subjects.

Exacerbated circulatory proinflammatory (TNF-α and leptin), and decreased anti-inflammatory (adiponectin) adipokine levels in individuals with central obesity and the clustering of other 4 MetS risk factors might be associated with the risk of T2D

TNF-α is a cell signalling protein that is responsible for metabolic imbalances such as insulin resistance and altered lipid and carbohydrate metabolism [43,44]. For subjects with central obesity, the clustering of 4 risk factors was associated with an increase in TNF-α concentration. Although the exact molecular mechanisms that link obesity to other MetS risk factors remains unclear, TNF-α has been shown to be associated with MetS risk factors [45,46]. Furthermore, TNF-α has been reported to be increased in proportion to the number of the MetS components [45,47]. Increases in circulating TNF-α has also been suggested to be related to insulin resistance and augmented systemic inflammation [48,49]. Apart from insulin resistance, obesity-associated hypertension led to an increase in TNF-α in a French Canadian cohort [47]. Similarly, subjects with severe hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, high body mass index, and low HDL-cholesterol were reported to have high circulating TNF-α levels [45,50]. Increases in circulating TNF-α are associated with peripheral insulin resistance, increased plasma glucose and insulin levels before the onset of T2D, whereas the increased fasting glucose level induced by obesity can be prevented by TNF-α deficiency [45].

In addition, our data revealed the interaction effect between central obesity and the clustering of the other 4 MetS risk factors on adiponectin and leptin. We observed relatively lower circulating adiponectin in centrally obese subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors as compared to the subjects with only central obesity, with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors or without any MetS risk factors. Consistent with our results, a low circulating adiponectin level has been previously shown to correlate with an increase in MetS risk factors [51]. Similarly, hypoadiponectinemia has been suggested to place MetS patients at a higher risk of developing T2D [52]. Adiponectin activates 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [53], which regulates lipogenesis and cholesterol synthesis [54]. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that hypoadiponectinemia might be an independent risk factor for hypertension [55,56]. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the regulation of BP and cardiovascular function. This system is activated in MetS and leads to arterial wall inflammation, elevation of the angiotensin II level, and oxidative stress [57,58]. Suppressing RAS by elevating adiponectin has been proposed as an effective strategy for treating MetS [59]. In addition to adiponectin, we also observed relatively higher leptin in centrally obese subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors compared to the subjects with only central obesity, with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors or without any MetS risk factors. Consistently, high circulating leptin level has been observed in individuals with MetS risk factors compared to those without MetS risk factors [60]. The exacerbation in leptin level in obese patients with the clustering of 4 risk factors indicates that leptin may be involved in the severity of MetS and may lead to T2D [61,62] associated with central obesity. The inclined pattern of serum leptin has been reported in MetS. Specifically, associations between leptin and other risk factors of MetS (r ≥ ± 0.1) and body mass index (r ≥ ± 0.5) for both sexes have been established [63]. In contrast, serum leptin has been reported to be increased in proportion to the number of MetS risk factors, regardless of the weight status of the subjects [64]. The contradictory findings between studies may be explainable by the complexity of the definition of MetS; for instance, an identical number of MetS risk factors might not indicate that the subjects would share precisely the same cardiometabolic risk factor profiles and characteristics.

The interaction between the components of the clinical phenotype (e.g., central obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) of MetS might contribute to the development of a pro-inflammatory state [65]. Previous studies have suggested that the anti-inflammatory: pro-inflammatory adipokine equilibrium is important for preventing MetS, especially in central obese subjects [34]. For instance, a low adiponectin: leptin ratio indicates the severity of MetS in patients with central obesity compared to those without MetS [35]. Additionally, the adiponectin: leptin ratio has been shown to correlate with variations in systolic BP, insulin sensitivity, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein in MetS patients with obesity [35]. Consistently, our results also indicate the interaction effect between central obesity and the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors on the adiponectin: leptin ratio (P = 0.016) (data not shown). Physiologically, a disproportion in the expression of anti-/pro-inflammatory adipokines results in an increased size of adipocytes. These hypertrophied adipocytes result in a shift towards the dominance of pro-inflammatory adipokines [66]. The imbalance in the production of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory biomolecules precedes increased immune cell infiltration and the induction of a macrophage phenotype switch in visceral adipose tissue [67]. We propose that the interaction between central obesity and the clustering of all 4 MetS risk factors would favour a dominance of pro-inflammatory adipokines that might be involved in increasing the severity of MetS.

Elevated circulating levels of insulin, chemerin, PAI-1 and IL-6 might represent the first-line adipokines that initiate subsequent inflammatory cascades in individuals with only central obesity

The main effect of central obesity was observed in insulin, PAI-1, chemerin and IL-6. Interestingly, all 4 biomarkers were shown to be augmented during the differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes. Hyperinsulinemia enhances the differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes, which is a major contributor to the increased PAI-1 in obese subjects [68]. Chemerin is a chemoattractant recruiting macrophages to adipose tissue. Furthermore, adipocytes serve as both secretary cells of chemerin and a target for autocrine chemerin signaling, regulation of adipogenesis and adipocyte differentiation [69]. Similarly, several studies have reported that serum IL-6 is elevated in obese patients [70] and that IL-6 is highly expressed in preadipocytes compared with the mature adipocytes of obese mice [71]. Our results show that increases in adipokines (PAI-1, IL-6, and chemerin), which favour the differentiation of preadipocytes attributed to the effect of central obesity, might represent the first-line adipokines that initiate subsequent inflammatory cascades in individuals with only central obesity.

Elevated circulating levels of insulin, chemerin, IL-8 and visfatin in individuals with only the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors might result from the migration and activation of macrophages

On the other hand, insulin, chemerin, IL-8 and visfatin demonstrated the main effect of the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors. Insulin resistance has been reported as a combination of macrophages accumulation that secretes proinflammatory adipocytokines and altered outcome of insulin target cells [72]. Notably, in this context, the primary sources of the above adipokines are macrophages, implying that migration and activation of macrophages may be the key events that mediate the development of MetS. The migrated macrophages secrete chemotactic cytokines such as IL-8 that further induce macrophage migration to adipose tissue. Visfatin is produced in visceral adipose tissue and has been proposed as the missing link between intra-central obesity and diabetes [73]. Visfatin is secreted by neutrophils and is regulated by pro-inflammatory factors (such as TNF-α and IL-6) in monocytes [74,75]. Likewise, chemerin is a chemokine that recruits macrophages to adipose tissue and plays an important role in pro-inflammatory processes such as chemotaxis modulation and dendritic cell and macrophage activation [76]. Researchers have verified that the serum levels of chemerin are higher in MetS patients compared with controls and are correlated with the level of the MetS components [77]. The adipokines mentioned above have been reported to increase the severity of MetS; however, the adipokine expression levels in MetS patients with all 4 MetS risk factors have not been reported. Therefore, our results suggest that changes in insulin, IL-8, visfatin and chemerin levels may indicate the severity of MetS with the clustering of 4 MetS risk factors. These adipokines recruit pro-inflammatory macrophages and, hence, promote the transition from a mild metabolic dysfunction phenotype to a full metabolic dysfunction phenotype [78].

Individuals with different metabolic characteristics possessed distinct adipokine profiles: A group wise comparison

We compared the levels of adipokines among lean subjects with none of the MetS cardiometabolic risk factors (N4RF_NO), subjects without the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors but with central obesity (N4RF_O), subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors but without central obesity (4RF_NO), and subjects with the clustering of 4 MetS cardiometabolic risk factors and central obesity (4RF_O). In line with our hypothesis, subjects with different metabolic characteristics possessed distinct adipokine profiles.

Central obesity is very often the first risk factor that patients acquire during the development of MetS [79]. After acquiring the central obesity, other risk factors begin to emerge. Therefore, adipokine profiles in three distinct groups (N4RF_NO, N4RF_O and 4RF_O) in the present study can give us some hints about the classical progression of MetS. It came as no surprise that subjects in N4RF_NO had the lowest level of all adipokines, except adiponectin. Our results clearly demonstrated that insulin, leptin, chemerin and PAI-1 were elevated and adiponectin was reduced in N4RF_O subjects when compared to N4RF_NO subjects (Table 2). As a result of increased adipose depot, adipose tissues in N4RF_O subjects were possibly infiltrated by a large number of macrophages which further stimulated the secretion of adipokines by both adipocytes and activated macrophages, resulting in a substantial increase in TNFα, IL-8, insulin, chemerin and visfatin and a decrease in adiponectin in 4RF_O subjects compared to N4RF_O. It is worth to note that six out of twelve biomarkers were significantly altered in subjects from N4RF_O compared to 4RF_O. Among the six biomarkers, four of them, including insulin, adiponectin, TNFα, and chemerin, showed the stepwise increase or decrease (for adiponectin) (i.e., from N4RF_NO compared to N4RF_O and then from N4RF_O compared to 4RF_O). These four biomarkers together with macrophages and adipocytes can create a positive feedback loop that further amplifies inflammation in adipose tissue and induces systemic inflammation [79]. It is possible that obesity induces altered metabolism and gene expression in enlarged adipocytes, leading to increased lipolysis and release of chemerin. As a result, a large number of macrophages migrate into adipose tissue due to chemotactic effect. Hyperinsulinemia promotes TNFα production in migrated macrophages [72]. Finally, TNFα downregulates the anti-inflammatory adiponectin [80] and modulates macrophage polarization to an unfavorable M1 phenotype [81], resulting in a pro-inflammatory microenvironment in adipose tissue and further stress on adipocytes. Therefore, we speculate that these four biomarkers are the key players in promoting adipose tissue inflammation, necrosis, and systemic inflammation. Our correlation analysis further confirmed the importance of these four biomarkers. Both insulin and adiponectin were correlated with all manifestations of MetS. Chemerin and TNFα were associated with five and two signs, respectively, of MetS. Most importantly, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL and glucose had the strongest correlations with adiponectin and chemerin. Our results indicated that, among the 12 studied biomarkers, adiponectin, chemerin, insulin and TNFα showed a progressive increase/decrease (i.e., N4RF_NO compared to N4RF_O compared to 4RF_O). Three biomarkers including adiponectin, chemerin and insulin correlated with at least 5 out of 6 manifestations of MetS. Surprisingly, both adiponectin and chemerin had the strongest association with all criteria of MetS, except for diastolic blood pressure. This study provides comprehensive profiling data in investigating the association between adipokines and manifestations of MetS. Our results suggested that adiponectin and chemerin might be the most important biomarkers in the development of MetS related to obesity.

Although MetS is strongly associated with adiposity, subjects with MetS are unnecessarily obese. The term metabolically obese but normal weight has been used to describe this particular group of individuals who possess normal body weight but display insulin resistance, increased abdominal adiposity, higher levels of blood pressure and abnormal lipid profiles [82]. In the current study, subjects from 4RF_NO manifested an unfavorable adipokine profile. Chemerin, IL-8, and insulin were significantly increased whereas adiponectin was significantly decreased when compared to subjects from N4RF_NO. Consistent with our previous observation, chemerin and adiponectin are strongly associated with MetS regardless of the body weight. Interestingly, adipokines that were higher in subjects from 4RF_O, including TNFα, visfatin, and IL-6, were not found elevated in subjects from 4RF_NO. Our results implied that different mechanisms possibly mediate the developments of MetS in obese and non-obese subjects. Importantly, IL-8 was significantly higher in subjects from 4RF_NO. IL-8 is a macrophage-derived mediator of angiogenesis [83] and involved in the development of MetS, but its exact role in obesity and development of MetS remains to be investigated.

Conclusion

In this study, our findings are based on the screening of insulin and 11 adipokines to examine the interaction of central obesity and the clustering of the other 4 MetS risk factors on circulatory proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory adipokines. Therefore, a study profiling all adipokines for these clinical and pathophysiological changes to improve early patient identification may be warranted. Although the adopted sample size has resulted in a statistical power of 80% or above for most of our significant outcome measures, the constraint of sample size might also be a limitation in the present study. Furthermore, the present investigation was limited to an Asian population; hence our results cannot be generalized to non-Asian populations. In conclusion, our results revealed the interaction of central obesity and the clustering of the other MetS cardiometabolic risk factors for exacerbating circulatory TNF-α and leptin; and reducing adiponectin. This combined effect of central obesity with all of the 4 MetS risk factors increases the proinflammatory status of adipokines. These altered adipokine patterns (low circulating adiponectin and high TNF-α and leptin) may provide useful information on the additional risk of metabolic derangements. Our results indicate that the inflammatory status of MetS disorders might become severe in the presence of central obesity. These results also confirm the International Diabetes Federation’s definition of MetS by placing central obesity as the compulsory risk factor for MetS diagnosis. Further research is needed to fully understand the exact roles of adipokines in the progression of MetS and the subsequent development of chronic diseases such as T2D and CVD.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. Group wise correlation scatterplot of all twelve biomarkers with all six characteristics of MetS.

Statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05 and indicated by “* “and “R” represents the spearman correlation coefficient.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical assistances of Emily Y. Ng, Alex Y. Hui, Norris N. Ho, Claire L. Lee, Celia S. Wong, and Canace Y. Chan.

Citation: Supriya R, Tam BT, Yu AP, Lee PH, Lai CW, Cheng KK, et al. (2018) Adipokines demonstrate the interacting influence of central obesity with other cardiometabolic risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Hong Kong Chinese adults. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201585

References

1. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and T of HBC in A. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA [Internet]. 2001 May 16;285(19):2486–97. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11368702 pmid:11368702

2. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, et al. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2004 Dec 15;114(12):1752–61. Available from: http://www.jci.org/articles/view/21625 pmid:15599400

3. Lee I-M. Body Weight and Mortality. JAMA [Internet]. 1993 Dec 15;270(23):2823. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.1993.03510230061036 pmid:8133621

4. Alberti KGMM, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome: A Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International. Circulation [Internet]. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1640–5. Available from: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644 pmid:19805654

5. Wildman RP. The Obese Without Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and the Normal Weight With Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering. Arch Intern Med [Internet]. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1617. Available from: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archinte.168.15.1617 pmid:18695075

6. Chan JCN, Malik V, Jia W, Kadowaki T, Yajnik CS, Yoon K-H, et al. Diabetes in Asia. JAMA [Internet]. 2009 May 27;301(20):2129. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2009.726 pmid:19470990

7. Weltman A, Despres JP, Clasey JL, Weltman JY, Wideman L, Kanaley J, et al. Impact of abdominal visceral fat, growth hormone, fitness, and insulin on lipids and lipoproteins in older adults. Metabolism [Internet]. 2003 Jan;52(1):73–80. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002604950205223X pmid:12524665

8. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C. Rising Burden of Obesity in Asia. J Obes [Internet]. 2010;2010:1–8. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jobe/2010/868573/

9. Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet]. 2013 Jan 20;9(1):13–27. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/nrendo.2012.199. pmid:23165161

10. Yajnik CS, Lubree HG, Rege SS, Naik SS, Deshpande JA, Deshpande SS, et al. Adiposity and Hyperinsulinemia in Indians Are Present at Birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2002 Dec;87(12):5575–80. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/jc.2002-020434 pmid:12466355

11. Lee I-T, Chiu Y-F, Hwu C-M, He C-T, Chiang F-T, Lin Y-C, et al. Central obesity is important but not essential component of the metabolic syndrome for predicting diabetes mellitus in a hypertensive family-based cohort. Results from the Stanford Asia-pacific program for hypertension and insulin resistance (SAPPHIRe) Ta. Cardiovasc Diabetol [Internet]. 2012;11(1):43. Available from: http://cardiab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2840-11-43

12. Sakashita Y, Nakanishi S, Yoneda M, Nakashima R, Yamane K, Kohno N. Regardless of central obesity, metabolic syndrome is a significant predictor of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans. J Diabetes Investig [Internet]. 2015 Sep;6(5):527–32. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jdi.12327 pmid:26417409

13. Gao W, DECODE Study Group. Does the constellation of risk factors with and without abdominal adiposity associate with different cardiovascular mortality risk? Int J Obes (Lond) [Internet]. 2008 May;32(5):757–62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18209738

14. Nishikawa K, Takahashi K, Okutani T, Yamada R, Kinaga T, Matsumoto M, et al. Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Non-Obese Individuals with Clustering of Metabolic Factors: A Longitudinal Study. Intern Med [Internet]. 2015;54(4):375–82. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/internalmedicine/54/4/54_54.3092/_article pmid:25748952

15. Reaven GM. Are insulin resistance and/or compensatory hyperinsulinemia involved in the etiology and clinical course of patients with hypertension? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord [Internet]. 1995 May;19 Suppl 1:S2–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7550533

16. Jeppesen J, Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F. Relation of high TG-low HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol to the incidence of ischemic heart disease. An 8-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol [Internet]. 1997 Jun;17(6):1114–20. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9194762 pmid:9194762

17. Jeppesen J, Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F. High triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol and blood pressure and risk of ischemic heart disease. Hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979) [Internet]. 2000 Aug;36(2):226–32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10948082

18. Yu AP, Tam BT, Yau WY, Chan KS, Yu SS, Chung TL, et al. Association of endothelin-1 and matrix metallopeptidase-9 with metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older adults. Diabetol Metab Syndr [Internet]. 2015 Dec 10;7(1):111. Available from: http://www.dmsjournal.com/content/7/1/111

19. Balistreri CR, Caruso C, Candore G. The Role of Adipose Tissue and Adipokines in Obesity-Related Inflammatory Diseases. Mediators Inflamm [Internet]. 2010;2010:1–19. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mi/2010/802078/

20. Després J-P. Abdominal obesity: the most prevalent cause of the metabolic syndrome and related cardiometabolic risk. Eur Hear J Suppl [Internet]. 2006 May 1;8(suppl_B):B4–12. Available from: http://academic.oup.com/eurheartjsupp/article/8/suppl_B/B4/461962/Abdominal-obesity-the-most-prevalent-cause-of-the

21. Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, et al. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2003 Dec;112(12):1821–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14679177 pmid:14679177

22. Yamamoto K, Kiyohara T, Murayama Y, Kihara S, Okamoto Y, Funahashi T, et al. Production of adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory protein, in mesenteric adipose tissue in Crohn’s disease. Gut [Internet]. 2005 Jun;54(6):789–96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888786 pmid:15888786

23. Lumeng CN, Bodzin JL, Saltiel AR. Obesity induces a phenotypic switch in adipose tissue macrophage polarization. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2007 Jan;117(1):175–84. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17200717 pmid:17200717

24. Jernås M, Palming J, Sjöholm K, Jennische E, Svensson P-A, Gabrielsson BG, et al. Separation of human adipocytes by size: hypertrophic fat cells display distinct gene expression. FASEB J [Internet]. 2006 Jul;20(9):1540–2. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16754744 pmid:16754744

25. Mauer J, Chaurasia B, Goldau J, Vogt MC, Ruud J, Nguyen KD, et al. Signaling by IL-6 promotes alternative activation of macrophages to limit endotoxemia and obesity-associated resistance to insulin. Nat Immunol [Internet]. 2014 May;15(5):423–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681566 pmid:24681566

26. Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL, Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 1995 May 1;95(5):2409–15. Available from: http://www.jci.org/articles/view/117936 pmid:7738205

27. Arner E, Mejhert N, Kulyté A, Balwierz PJ, Pachkov M, Cormont M, et al. Adipose tissue microRNAs as regulators of CCL2 production in human obesity. Diabetes [Internet]. 2012 Aug;61(8):1986–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22688341 pmid:22688341

28. Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein S. Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes [Internet]. 2007 Apr;56(4):1010–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17287468 pmid:17287468

29. Marsland AL, McCaffery JM, Muldoon MF, Manuck SB. Systemic inflammation and the metabolic syndrome among middle-aged community volunteers. Metabolism [Internet]. 2010 Dec;59(12):1801–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20619428 pmid:20619428

30. Abu-Farha M, Behbehani K, Elkum N. Comprehensive analysis of circulating adipokines and hsCRP association with cardiovascular disease risk factors and metabolic syndrome in Arabs. Cardiovasc Diabetol [Internet]. 2014 Apr 9;13:76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24716628 pmid:24716628

31. Abella V, Scotece M, Conde J, López V, Lazzaro V, Pino J, et al. Adipokines, metabolic syndrome and rheumatic diseases. J Immunol Res [Internet]. 2014;2014:343746. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24741591 pmid:24741591

32. Supriya R, Yung BY, Yu AP, Lee PH, Lai CW, Cheng KK, et al. Adipokine Profiling in Adult Women With Central Obesity and Hypertension. Front Physiol [Internet]. 2018 Mar 27;9. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2018.00294/full

33. Lee JM, Kim SR, Yoo SJ, Hong OK, Son HS, Chang SA. The relationship between adipokines, metabolic parameters and insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. J Int Med Res [Internet]. 37(6):1803–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146878 pmid:20146878

34. Meiliana A, Wijaya A, As’ad S. The Relationship of Proinflammatory and Antiinflammatory Adipokines in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome in Centrally Obese Men. Indones Biomed J [Internet]. 2010 Dec 1;2(3):118. Available from: http://inabj.org/index.php/ibj/article/view/125

35. Masquio DCL, de Piano A, Campos RMS, Sanches PL, Carnier J, Corgosinho FC, et al. The role of multicomponent therapy in the metabolic syndrome, inflammation and cardiovascular risk in obese adolescents. Br J Nutr. 2015 Jun;113(12):1920–30. pmid:25907896

36. Van Guilder GP, Hoetzer GL, Greiner JJ, Stauffer BL, DeSouza CA. Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Obese Adults*. Obesity [Internet]. 2006 Dec;14(12):2127–31. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1038/oby.2006.248 pmid:17189537

37. Grundy SM. Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation [Internet]. 2005 Oct 25;112(17):2735–52. Available from: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404 pmid:16157765

38. Aronson D, Bartha P, Zinder O, Kerner A, Markiewicz W, Avizohar O, et al. Obesity is the major determinant of elevated C-reactive protein in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes [Internet]. 2004 May 2;28(5):674–9. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802609

39. Aekplakorn W, Chaiyapong Y, Neal B, Chariyalertsak S, Kunanusont C, Phoolcharoen W, et al. Prevalence and determinants of overweight and obesity in Thai adults: results of the Second National Health Examination Survey. J Med Assoc Thai [Internet]. 2004 Jun;87(6):685–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15279350 pmid:15279350

40. Sidik S, Rampal L. The prevalence and factors associated with obesity among adult women in Selangor, Malaysia. Asia Pac Fam Med [Internet]. 2009;8(1):2. Available from: http://apfmj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1447-056X-8-2 pmid:19358728

41. Griffiths PL, Bentley ME. The Nutrition Transition Is Underway in India. J Nutr [Internet]. 2001 Oct 1;131(10):2692–700. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/131/10/2692/4686601 pmid:11584092

42. Yoon K-H, Lee J-H, Kim J-W, Cho JH, Choi Y-H, Ko S-H, et al. Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2006 Nov 11;368(9548):1681–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17098087

43. Patel HJ, Patel BM. TNF-α and cancer cachexia: Molecular insights and clinical implications. Life Sci [Internet]. 2016 Dec; Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0024320516306853

44. Tijerina AJ. The biochemical basis of metabolism in cancer cachexia. Dimens Crit Care Nurs [Internet]. 2004;23(6):237–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15586034 pmid:15586034

45. Miyazaki Y, Pipek R, Mandarino LJ, DeFronzo RA. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and insulin resistance in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord [Internet]. 2003 Jan;27(1):88–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12532159 pmid:12532159

46. Nieto-Vazquez I, Fernández-Veledo S, Krämer DK, Vila-Bedmar R, Garcia-Guerra L, Lorenzo M. Insulin resistance associated to obesity: the link TNF-alpha. Arch Physiol Biochem [Internet]. 2008 Jul;114(3):183–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18629684 pmid:18629684

47. Pausova Z, Deslauriers B, Gaudet D, Tremblay J, Kotchen TA, Larochelle P, et al. Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor- Gene Locus in Obesity and Obesity-Associated Hypertension in French Canadians. Hypertension [Internet]. 2000 Jul 1;36(1):14–9. Available from: http://hyper.ahajournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1161/01.HYP.36.1.14 pmid:10904006

48. Castrillo A, Tontonoz P. Nuclear receptors in macrophage biology: At the Crossroads of Lipid Metabolism and Inflammation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol [Internet]. 2004 Nov;20(1):455–80. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.134432

49. Glass CK, Ogawa S. Combinatorial roles of nuclear receptors in inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol [Internet]. 2006 Jan;6(1):44–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16493426 pmid:16493426

50. Jonkers IJ, Mohrschladt MF, Westendorp RG, van der Laarse A, Smelt AH. Severe hypertriglyceridemia with insulin resistance is associated with systemic inflammation: reversal with bezafibrate therapy in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med [Internet]. 2002 Mar;112(4):275–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11893366 pmid:11893366

51. Nascimento H, Costa E, Rocha S, Lucena C, Rocha-Pereira P, Rêgo C, et al. Adiponectin and markers of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents: impact of 8-mo regular physical exercise program. Pediatr Res [Internet]. 2014 Aug;76(2):159–65. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819375 pmid:24819375

52. McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Saltzman E, Wilson PWF, Jacques PF. Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2004 Feb;27(2):538–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747241 pmid:14747241

53. Lafontan M, Viguerie N. Role of adipokines in the control of energy metabolism: focus on adiponectin. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;6(6):580–5. pmid:16973420

54. Long YC. AMP-activated protein kinase signaling in metabolic regulation. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2006 Jul 3;116(7):1776–83. Available from: http://www.jci.org/cgi/doi/10.1172/JCI29044 pmid:16823475

55. Iwashima Y, Katsuya T, Ishikawa K, Ouchi N, Ohishi M, Sugimoto K, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia Is an Independent Risk Factor for Hypertension. Hypertension. 2004 Jun;43(6):1318–23. pmid:15123570

56. Kazumi T, Kawaguchi A, Sakai K, Hirano T, Yoshino G. Young men with high-normal blood pressure have lower serum adiponectin, smaller LDL size, and higher elevated heart rate than those with optimal blood pressure. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2002 Jun;25(6):971–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12032101 pmid:12032101

57. Brasier AR, Recinos A, Eledrisi MS. Vascular inflammation and the renin-angiotensin system. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol [Internet]. 2002 Aug 1;22(8):1257–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12171785 pmid:12171785

58. de Kloet AD, Krause EG, Woods SC. The renin angiotensin system and the metabolic syndrome. Physiol Behav [Internet]. 2010 Jul;100(5):525–34. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031938410001563 pmid:20381510

59. van Stijn CMW, Kim J, Barish GD, Tietge UJF, Tangirala RK. Adiponectin Expression Protects against Angiotensin II-Mediated Inflammation and Accelerated Atherosclerosis. Zhao Y-Y, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86404. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086404 pmid:24466075

60. Moreno LA, Pineda I, Rodríguez G, Fleta J, Giner A, Juste MG, et al. Leptin and Metabolic Syndrome in Obese and Non-Obese Children. Horm Metab Res [Internet]. 2002 Jul;34(7):394–9. Available from: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2002-33472 pmid:12189588

61. Friedman JM, Halaas JL. No Title. Nature [Internet]. 1998 Oct 22;395(6704):763–70. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/27376 pmid:9796811

62. Houseknecht KL, Baile CA, Matteri RL, Spurlock ME. The biology of leptin: a review. J Anim Sci [Internet]. 1998;76(5):1405. Available from: https://www.animalsciencepublications.org/publications/jas/abstracts/76/5/1405 pmid:9621947

63. Martins M do C, Lima Faleiro L, Fonseca A. Relação entre a leptina, a massa corporal e a síndrome metabólica numa amostra da população adulta. Rev Port Cardiol [Internet]. 2012 Nov;31(11):711–9. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0870255112001941 pmid:23040870

64. Yun JE, Kimm H, Jo J, Jee SH. Serum leptin is associated with metabolic syndrome in obese and nonobese Korean populations. Metabolism [Internet]. 2010 Mar;59(3):424–9. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002604950900345X pmid:19846168

65. Kaur J. A Comprehensive Review on Metabolic Syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract [Internet]. 2014;2014:1–21. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/crp/2014/943162/

66. Skurk T, Alberti-Huber C, Herder C, Hauner H. Relationship between Adipocyte Size and Adipokine Expression and Secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2007 Mar;92(3):1023–33. Available from: http://press.endocrine.org/doi/10.1210/jc.2006-1055 pmid:17164304

67. Kang YE, Kim JM, Joung KH, Lee JH, You BR, Choi MJ, et al. The Roles of Adipokines, Proinflammatory Cytokines, and Adipose Tissue Macrophages in Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance in Modest Obesity and Early Metabolic Dysfunction. López Lluch G, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154003. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154003 pmid:27101398

68. Samad F, Yamamoto K, Loskutoff DJ. Distribution and regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in murine adipose tissue in vivo. Induction by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 1996 Jan 1;97(1):37–46. Available from: http://www.jci.org/articles/view/118404 pmid:8550848

69. Goralski KB, McCarthy TC, Hanniman EA, Zabel BA, Butcher EC, Parlee SD, et al. Chemerin, a Novel Adipokine That Regulates Adipogenesis and Adipocyte Metabolism. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 2007 Sep 21;282(38):28175–88. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/lookup/doi/10.1074/jbc.M700793200 pmid:17635925

70. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes [Internet]. 1988 Dec 1;37(12):1595–607. Available from: http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/diabetes.37.12.1595 pmid:3056758

71. Harkins JM, Moustaid-Moussa N, Chung Y-J, Penner KM, Pestka JJ, North CM, et al. Expression of interleukin-6 is greater in preadipocytes than in adipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells and C57BL/6J and ob/ob mice. J Nutr [Internet]. 2004 Oct;134(10):2673–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15465765 pmid:15465765

72. Olefsky JM, Glass CK. Macrophages, Inflammation, and Insulin Resistance. Annu Rev Physiol [Internet]. 2010 Mar 17;72(1):219–46. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135846

73. Sethi JK, Vidal-Puig A. Visfatin: the missing link between intra-abdominal obesity and diabetes? Trends Mol Med [Internet]. 2005 Aug;11(8):344–7. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471491405001401 pmid:16005682

74. Dahl TB, Yndestad A, Skjelland M, Øie E, Dahl A, Michelsen A, et al. Increased expression of visfatin in macrophages of human unstable carotid and coronary atherosclerosis: possible role in inflammation and plaque destabilization. Circulation. 2007 Feb;115(8):972–80. pmid:17283255

75. Kendal CE, Bryant-Greenwood GD. Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF/Visfatin) gene expression is modulated by NF-kappaB and AP-1 in human amniotic epithelial cells. Placenta. 2007 Apr;28(4):305–14. pmid:16701870

76. Wittamer V, Bondue B, Guillabert A, Vassart G, Parmentier M, Communi D. Neutrophil-mediated maturation of chemerin: a link between innate and adaptive immunity. J Immunol. 2005 Jul;175(1):487–93. pmid:15972683

77. Lehrke M, Becker A, Greif M, Stark R, Laubender RP, von Ziegler F, et al. Chemerin is associated with markers of inflammation and components of the metabolic syndrome but does not predict coronary atherosclerosis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009 Aug;161(2):339–44. pmid:19497986

78. Titov VN. [The biological function of trophology, biological reactions of exo- and endotrophy the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome, leptin and adiponectin: a lecture]. Klin Lab Diagn [Internet]. 2014 Jun;(6):27–38. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25335398 pmid:25335398

79. Grundy SM. Metabolic Syndrome: Connecting and Reconciling Cardiovascular and Diabetes Worlds. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2006 Mar;47(6):1093–100. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109705031098 pmid:16545636

80. Iida KT, Shimano H, Kawakami Y, Sone H, Toyoshima H, Suzuki S, et al. Insulin up-regulates tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in macrophages through an extracellular-regulated kinase-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 2001 Aug 31;276(35):32531–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11443108 pmid:11443108

81. Kroner A, Greenhalgh AD, Zarruk JG, Passos dos Santos R, Gaestel M, David S. TNF and Increased Intracellular Iron Alter Macrophage Polarization to a Detrimental M1 Phenotype in the Injured Spinal Cord. Neuron [Internet]. 2014 Sep;83(5):1098–116. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896627314006382 pmid:25132469

82. Ruderman N, Chisholm D, Pi-Sunyer X, Schneider S. The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited. Diabetes [Internet]. 1998 May;47(5):699–713. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9588440 pmid:9588440

83. Koch AE, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, Harlow LA, DiPietro LA, Elner VM, et al. Interleukin-8 as a macrophage-derived mediator of angiogenesis. Science [Internet]. 1992 Dec 11;258(5089):1798–801. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1281554 pmid:1281554