It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We analyzed whole genomes of unique paired samples from smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) patients progressing to multiple myeloma (MM). We report that the genomic landscape, including mutational profile and structural rearrangements at the smoldering stage is very similar to MM. Paired sample analysis shows two different patterns of progression: a “static progression model”, where the subclonal architecture is retained as the disease progressed to MM suggesting that progression solely reflects the time needed to accumulate a sufficient disease burden; and a “spontaneous evolution model”, where a change in the subclonal composition is observed. We also observe that activation-induced cytidine deaminase plays a major role in shaping the mutational landscape of early subclinical phases, while progression is driven by APOBEC cytidine deaminases. These results provide a unique insight into myelomagenesis with potential implications for the definition of smoldering disease and timing of treatment initiation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
3 CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université de Nantes, Université d’Angers, Nantes, France; CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
4 Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK
5 Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
6 Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
7 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Department of Bioengineering and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
8 Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9 Genomics of Myeloma Laboratory, L’Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France
10 Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
11 Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, USA