Abstract
500 μm had greater visual gains compared to those with CST
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Smt Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute; Image Reading Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
3 Smt Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana
4 Smt Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
5 Department of Biostatistics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana