INTRODUCTION
Current trends in increasing antibiotic resistance and decreasing drug development require urgent mitigation (1–3). Antibiotic-resistant infections claim over 700,000 lives globally each year, and this annual toll is predicted to swell to 10 million deaths a year by 2050 without significant intervention. A growing number of bacterial infections are already resistant to virtually all first-line antibiotics (2, 4). Physicians are forced to use “last-resort,” broad-spectrum antibiotics more frequently, and resistance to even these carefully safeguarded drugs has emerged (5, 6). Daptomycin is one such last-resort nonlytic (7) lipopeptide antibiotic and is effective against both stationary-phase and log-phase Gram-positive bacterial pathogens (8), including
The first report of higher levels (~20-fold over the wild-type [WT] strain) of daptomycin resistance came from laboratory adaptive evolution experiments performed with the nonpathogenic soil bacterium
Over the past few years, there has been a steady increase in reports of even higher levels of daptomycin resistance (≥4,000-fold increases in resistance) in a number of clinical pathogens, including viridians group streptococci (15),
RESULTS
Analysis was performed on an evolved inpatient HLDR isolate (RP1b) and seven evolved in vitro HLDR isolates. These strains were banked clinical
FIG 1
Available and tested
PG synthase mutations in HLDR
All cases of evolved high-level daptomycin resistance (HLDR) in
FIG 2
All HLDR isolates have predicted nonfunctional mutations in pgsA2. (A) Structure of PG synthase monomer, with mutations in conserved sites overlaid. (B) Mutation in CDP alcohol phosphatidyl (CDP-AP) transferase active site conserved across species. (C) Mutation in the dimer interface domain. (D) Mutation in substrate binding pocket. (E) Premature stop mutations predicted to produce truncated products.
We found no additional SNPs in the
All of the parent daptomycin-susceptible
Minimal transcriptional changes in HLDR
No significant transcriptional changes were detected in biosynthetically linked genes in clinically evolved HLDR in
FIG 3
Lipid metabolism pathway of phosphatidylglycerol and cardiolipin, observed SNPs, and relative abundance changes of key lipids and transcripts between WT and HLDR isolates. (A and B) The PG (A) and CL (B) lipid synthesis pathways were constructed with KEGG. A total of 8 WT and HLDR isolate paired genomes were compared and nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms identified. The names and structures of the metabolites are on the left, with key lipids colored in red and green. R1 represents the 16:0 carbon chain, and R2 represents the 18:1 carbon chain. The enzyme nomenclature for each enzymatic step and the corresponding genes are located next to the appropriate synthesis arrow. SNP mutations for each enzyme/gene unit are indicated at the far right with the number of mutations among the 8 HLDR isolates, unless no mutations were present in any of the isolates. Except for pgsA2, none of the lipid synthesis genes for PG have SNPs. On the left side, black bars indicate the functional completeness of the PG synthesis pathway. The WT strain proceeds through the entire synthesis pathway producing PG, while the HLDR strain ends at the production of CDP-DAG. The green coloring of the lipid CDP-DAG indicates a 543-fold to 5,946-fold buildup of that metabolite in the HLDR isolates compared to the WT. The red coloring of PG and cardiolipin indicates a reduction of that metabolite in the HLDR isolates compared to the WT with a 369- to 1,990-fold reduction in PG. (C) Expression levels of genes involved in lipid synthesis pathways were not significantly altered in HLDR isolates (P > 0.05). Expression levels of the housekeeping genes rpoA and gyrA were also not significantly altered (P > 0.05).
Lipidomics reveals loss of phosphatidylglycerol in the membrane.
We found that loss of PG synthase function led to removal or at least a >360-fold reduction of membrane phosphatidylglycerol (PG) content in HLDR
FIG 4
Lipidomic comparison of WT and resistant paired isolates across mutation types. (A to E) The y axis represents the relative abundance of the important phospholipid between the WT and HLDR isolates. WT-HLDR pairs are associated by color, with WT represented by solid block colors and HLDR represented by black-striped colors. The value corresponding to the lipid that is most abundant in the WT or HLDR isolate has been normalized to 100. Fold changes, where calculable, are listed above the WT and HLDR comparisons; fold change was calculated using (b − a)/a, where “b” is the largest value and “a” is the smallest, to maintain a positive number. The structures of the lipid are directly to the right of the graph, where R1 represents the 16:0 carbon chain and R2 represents the 18:1 carbon chain. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA, and the data in every column represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001).
Until recently, determining the in vivo target of daptomycin had been challenging because removal of PG from the membrane of model Gram-positive bacteria without cell death was biologically untenable (16, 52). A recent study (31) corroborated that
FIG 5
Comparison of HLDR and WT lipid membranes and surface charge. (A) WP1a and RP1b isolates were imaged with transmission electron microscopy after 1 h with or without the addition of 10 µg/ml daptomycin. WP1a without daptomycin and RP1b with and without daptomycin showed no membrane irregularities, while WP1a with daptomycin showed membrane blebbing and disruption. EDL, electron-dense layer; ETL, electron-transparent layer. (B) All available WT and HLDR isolate pairs were checked for surface membrane charge changes. Charges were not indicative of HLDR, and the differences in the ranges of surface charge between the most and least negative WT and HLDR isolates were not significant, while there was significant variability in charge for both the WT and HLDR isolates compared within MIC group. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA and paired-means analysis (ns, P > 0.05; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001).
FIG 6
Daptomycin spent-medium growth curves. Growth curves of daptomycin-susceptible
Surface plasmon resonance analysis indicates that PG is the preferred target of daptomycin.
In support of our genomic and lipidomic conclusions, we performed a structure-function analysis of PG, which we show is the target of daptomycin and is necessary and sufficient for daptomycin activity in vitro. By combining surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis, which measures binding, and the carboxyfluorescein liposome stability assay (CFLSA), which measures activity, we are able to understand the structural interactions of daptomycin with PG. We used 200-nm artificial liposomes of relevant membrane lipid compositions to determine these relationships. Four lipid species—PG, CL, phosphatidic acid (PA), and phosphatidylcholine (PC) (Fig. 7F; see also Fig. S3)—were tested for daptomycin binding affinity. Both PI and Glua-DAG were found in the WT and HLDR isolates, and we did not test them in the next set of experiments because our lipidomics analysis indicated they are not the in vivo targets of daptomycin. Three types of liposomes of defined composition were assembled, comprised of PG, CL, and PA combined at a 1:1 molar ratio with PC, and were compared with homogeneous PC-only liposomes. Daptomycin showed a significantly higher affinity to PG liposomes (P ≤ 0.0001 and P ≤ 0.001) than any of the other lipids tested (Fig. 7). PG has been hypothesized to be an in vitro target of daptomycin due to its charged phosphate; however, the lack of binding to PC and the minimal binding to PA (Fig. 7E) indicate that the negatively charged phosphate plays a subordinate role in daptomycin binding. Additionally, when the fatty acyl groups were restricted to the bilayer surface plane, as they are in CL, daptomycin bound with much lower affinity (Fig. 7A to E). When the phosphatidyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate glycerol head group was accessible, as it is with PG, daptomycin bound more efficiently (Fig. 7A to E). Also, the daptomycin binding to the 1:1 PG liposomes appeared to saturate with daptomycin above 20 µg/ml, indicating that PG was acting as a binding site for the daptomycin (Fig. 7E). Accordingly, we would expect daptomycin activity to correlate with the binding of PG, CL, PA, and PC, and we tested this through a carboxyfluorescein liposome stability assay (CLFSA).
FIG 7
Daptomycin binding across concentrations and liposome content. (A to E) The y axis plots the normalized binding of daptomycin to liposomes at various concentration ratios. The x axis shows the types of liposomes tested, which include 1:1 equimolar ratios of PG, PA, or CL to PC and a control liposome made entirely of PC. The data in panel E demonstrate stepwise increases in daptomycin binding to PG. (F) Structures of our lipid of interest. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA, and the data in every column represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001). All tests were performed in buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), and 2 nM Ca2+.
CFLSA results indicate that PG is necessary and sufficient for daptomycin activity.
We found that the presence of PG in the bacterial membrane correlates with daptomycin’s bactericidal activity. Carboxyfluorescein liposome stability assays (CLFSA) confirmed PG’s role in daptomycin activity in vitro. Liposomes were generated as described above in the presence of self-quenching carboxyfluorescein. Daptomycin was added and interacted with the liposome membrane, releasing and diluting the carboxyfluorescein, which was then unquenched in the buffer, producing dramatically increased fluorescence (53). Daptomycin had higher activity against PG-containing membranes in all cases (Fig. 8A to F) and acted in a concentration-dependent manner against both PG and PA (Fig. 8F). Even though PA had lower binding affinity to daptomycin than CL (Fig. 7E), daptomycin was more active against PA than it was against liposomes containing CL, where there were no available glycerol-3-phosphates extending from the membrane surface for daptomycin binding (Fig. 8A and D). This is consistent with the observed PG-to-CL daptomycin activity relationship. Furthermore, this suggests to us that the larger (4-alkane-chain) CL suppressed daptomycin’s integration with the membrane structure, which is necessary for increased permeability in the CFLSA inhibiting daptomycin activity. We observed a reduction in daptomycin activity in liposomes that contain CL even though they have a higher binding affinity than those containing PA and PC (Fig. 7E and 8A to F). These findings indicate that the conversion of PG to CL can reduce the activity of daptomycin in membranes, providing low-level resistance against daptomycin in vivo.
FIG 8
Daptomycin activity across concentrations and liposome content. (A to F) The y axis plots percent activity of various concentrations of daptomycin based on absolute fluorescence that is normalized to the fluorescence achieved by the addition of Triton X-100. In panels A to E, the x axis shows the types of liposomes tested, which include 1:1 equimolar ratios of PG, PA, or CL to PC and a control liposome made entirely of PC. (F) The x axis indicates the concentration of daptomycin added to the different liposome compositions. (G) Relation of percent activity of 35 µg/ml of daptomycin (Dap) based on absolute fluorescence that is normalized to the fluorescence achieved by the addition of Triton X-100 (y axis) to the percentage of PG content of the liposome tested with PC contributing the remainder of the required lipid to reach 100% composition (x axis). Daptomycin activity against liposomes is correlated with MIC values for WT and daptomycin-resistant bacterial isolates where the percentage of PG content is known. HDR, highly daptomycin resistant. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA, and the data in every column represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001). All tests were performed in buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), and 2 nM Ca2+.
CFLSA data indicate that the PG concentration predicts daptomycin activity in vivo.
We found that daptomycin bactericidal activity is correlated with the percentage of composition of PG in the membrane. Liposomes with 0% to 50% PG were generated as described above, and daptomycin’s activity against those liposomes was tested at a consistent 35 µg/ml daptomycin. At or above 20% PG composition, daptomycin did not show a significant change in activity (Fig. 8G). This observation directly maps to daptomycin’s in vivo bactericidal activity as measured by MIC across a number of bacterial species.
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All
Whole-genome sequencing and comparison.
We sequenced 8 sets of
Transcriptomic methods.
We performed transcriptomic profiling of the susceptible isolate and the in vivo evolved resistant isolate from the original patient in triplicate. Frozen culture was streaked onto plates containing CAMHB plus blood and was grown overnight for single-colony selection and then inoculated into 50 ml CAMHB and grown overnight. The following day, the cultures were diluted to a 0.5 McFarland standard and split into three 100-ml cultures per condition. The diluted cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking for 1 h. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 200 × g for 15 min. The pellets were resuspended in RNAlater (76104 Qiagen) and frozen at −80 until analysis.
We used bead beating and SDS treatment to disrupt the sample cells, phenol:chloroform extraction to remove proteins, and alcohol precipitation followed by DNase treatment to isolate RNA from the frozen samples. rRNA was removed by the use of a Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kit (Epicentre). cDNA libraries were generated from the isolated RNA and amplified as described by Yoneda et al. (46). The double-stranded cDNA libraries were sequenced using a Nextera platform (64) to generate at least 7 million 75-bp reads from each sample.
Reads from the triplicate susceptible and HLDR samples were aligned to the reference genome constructed from the index susceptible isolate using cufflinks (65). Differences in expression between susceptible and HLDR strains were calculated using cuffdiff (66). Fold change was calculated as the resistant-isolate expression level divided by the susceptible-isolate expression level. Expression levels of control housekeeping genes rpoA and gyrA remained constant in resistant versus susceptible samples (fold changes of 1.02 and 1.00). The statistical significance of changes was calculated using the beta negative binomial distribution previously described by Trapnell et al. (66) and a significance level P value of <0.05.
Zeta potential measurement methods.
We performed surface charge measurement of the susceptible and HLDR strains using zeta potential (67). Frozen culture was streaked onto plates containing CAMHB plus blood and was grown overnight for single-colony selection and then inoculated into 50 ml CAMHB and grown overnight. The following day, the cultures were diluted to a 0.5 McFarland standard and one 4-ml culture was grown per condition. The diluted cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking for 1 h. A 1-ml volume of the culture was placed in a Malvern zeta-sizing cuvette. Zeta potential (surface charge) was measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (ZEN3600) dynamic light-scattering system (Malvern Instruments), and the data were compared between susceptible and HLDR paired strains. The expression levels of genes related to lipid biosynthesis are presented in Fig. 2 (see also Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Additionally, the genes with the greatest fold changes were determined (Data Set S1).
Spent-medium growth curve.
Lipidomic methods.
We performed comparative lipidomics across all four mutation types. Matched WT and HLDR isolates were grown overnight and diluted to an optical density (OD) of 1 in 2.5 ml liquid culture in quintuplicate. Liquid cultures were spun down to form a cell pellet, and whole-cell lipids were extracted using the Bligh-Dyer method (68). Samples were then stored at −20°C until the lipids could be analyzed via liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). The peak intensities were normalized to 100 for each lipid, with the WT or HLDR isolate being the source of the normalizing lipid. The WT lipids were chosen as the normalizing lipids for PG and cardiolipin because those lipids were most abundant in the WT isolate compared to the HLDR isolate. The HLDR lipids were chosen as the normalizing lipids for CDP-DAG, Glua-DAG, and PI because they were most abundant in the HLDR isolate compared to the WT isolate. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the data in every column in the figures in which the results of the analysis appear represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001).
Carboxyfluorescein liposome stability assay.
We performed a liposome disruption assay (69) in triplicate to assess the activity of daptomycin with various compositions of liposomes. Equimolar ratios of PG:PC, CL:PC, and PA:PC with a PC-only liposome control were created using the reverse-phase method in the presence of elution buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 2 nM Ca2+, and carboxyfluorescein (70). Liposomes were then suspended in a buffer solution containing 100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), and 2 nM Ca2+ and subjected to various concentrations of daptomycin from 3.125 µg/ml to 1,000 μg/ml. Levels of fluorescence increases due to daptomycin as a result of carboxyfluorescein release were measured using a Varian Eclipse spectrophotometer with an excitation wavelength of 492 nm and an emission wavelength of 512 nm. Daptomycin activity was measured as a function of normalization to 100% release by Triton X-100. Additionally, to assess percent PG with respect to daptomycin activity, PG:PC liposomes were created in triplicate with various mole fraction ratios converted to various proportions of PG (50%, 40%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 5%, and 0%) and subjected to 35 µg/ml daptomycin. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA, and the data in every column in the figures in which the results of the analysis appear represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001).
Surface plasmon resonance.
We performed surface plasmon resonance analyses (71) in triplicate to assess the binding of daptomycin with various compositions of liposomes. Equimolar ratios (1:1) of PG:PC, CL:PC, and PA:PC with a PC-only liposome control were created using the reverse-phase method (70). Liposomes were bound to a carboxymethyl dextran hydrogel surface sensor chip that was treated with sphingosine and subjected to various concentrations of daptomycin (3.125 µg/ml to 35 μg/ml) diluted in buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), and 2 nM Ca2+. Baseline, stable liposome, and peak daptomycin binding readings were collected. Daptomycin binding was normalized to liposome binding, and the data are presented as the level of daptomycin/lipid unit. Statistical analysis was performed with 1-way ANOVA, and the data in every column in the figures in which the results of the analysis appear represent comparisons of the means (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001).
Accession number(s).
All nucleotide sequences generated during this study have been uploaded to NCBI under BioProject accession no. PRJNA420593.
b Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
c Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
d Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
e Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Lipid Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
f Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
g Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
h Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
i Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Antimicrobial Development Specialists, LLC
McMaster University
Harvard Medical School
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2018 Goldner et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Daptomycin, a last-line-of-defense antibiotic for treating Gram-positive infections, is experiencing clinical failure against important infectious agents, including
IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance threatens the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment options, including last-line-of-defense drugs. Understanding how this resistance develops can help direct antimicrobial stewardship efforts and is critical to designing the next generation of antimicrobial therapies. Here we determine how
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer