It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The canonical model of sex-chromosome evolution predicts that, as recombination is suppressed along sex chromosomes, gametologs will progressively differentiate, eventually becoming heteromorphic. However, there are numerous examples of homomorphic sex chromosomes across the tree of life. This homomorphy has been suggested to result from frequent sex-chromosome turnovers, yet we know little about which forces drive them. Here, we describe an extremely fast rate of turnover among 28 species of Ranidae. Transitions are not random, but converge on several chromosomes, potentially due to genes they harbour. Transitions also preserve the ancestral pattern of male heterogamety, in line with the ‘hot-potato’ model of sex-chromosome transitions, suggesting a key role for mutation-load accumulation in non-recombining genomic regions. The importance of mutation-load selection in frogs might result from the extreme heterochiasmy they exhibit, making frog sex chromosomes differentiate immediately from emergence and across their entire length.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Arizona Game and Fish Department, 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ, USA
3 Amphibian Research Center, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
4 Division of EcoScience and Department of Life Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5 Museum of Southwestern Biology, MSC03 2020, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
6 Department of Ecological and Biological Science, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
7 CEFE, CNRS, University Montpellier, University Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
8 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
9 Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
10 Research Unit of Biodiversity, UO-CSIC-PA, Mieres, Spain; Department of Biology of Organisms and Systems, Universidad de Oviedo, Mieres, Spain
11 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per i sistemi agricoli e forestali del mediterraneo, Via Patacca 84, Ercolano, NA, Italy; MUSE - Museo delle Scienze, Sezione di Zoologia dei Vertebrati, corso del Lavoro e della Scienza 3, Trento, Italy
12 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
13 Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, National Academy of Science, Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia
14 Info Fauna - karch, UniMail, Bellevaux 51, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
15 Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology Department, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA