It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In plants, transgenerational inheritance of some epialleles has been demonstrated but it remains controversial whether epigenetic variation is subject to selection and contributes to adaptation. Simulating selection in a rapidly changing environment, we compare phenotypic traits and epigenetic variation between Arabidopsis thaliana populations grown for five generations under selection and their genetically nearly identical ancestors. Selected populations of two distinct genotypes show significant differences in flowering time and plant architecture, which are maintained for at least 2–3 generations in the absence of selection. While we cannot detect consistent genetic changes, we observe a reduction of epigenetic diversity and changes in the methylation state of about 50,000 cytosines, some of which are associated with phenotypic changes. Thus, we propose that epigenetic variation is subject to selection and can contribute to rapid adaptive responses, although the extent to which epigenetics plays a role in adaptation is still unclear.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland; Service and Support for Science IT, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; MWSchmid GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland; L. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
3 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland; Scientific IT Services, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
4 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland
5 Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
6 Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
7 Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
8 Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Basel, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK