It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This contribution considers the question of whether South African law permits the compelled surgical intrusion into a suspect’s body in order to obtain evidence. The courts came to contradictory findings regarding this issue. Such a procedure undoubtedly constitutes an infringement of a suspect’s right to privacy and the right to freedom and security of the person. It can only be tolerated if the requirements of the constitutional limitations clause are complied with. The authors support the approach that forced surgical interventions in order to obtain evidence are not permitted by the Criminal Procedure Act and that the legislature should intervene to provide for it. Recommendations as to the approach that could be followed are made.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer