It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that milk yields in sheep displaying strong seasonal sexual activity depend on the day length. The objective of the studies was to determine whether the introduction of melatonin in high pregnancy affects milk secretion in seasonally sheep. The studies were carried out on 60 Polish Longwool sheep. Sheep were allocated to three groups: Group I (n = 20 – the control group, lambed in February), Group II (n = 20 – a group of sheep lambed in June and kept under natural day-length conditions), Group III (n = 20 – a group of sheep with melatonin implants injected six weeks before lambing, sheep lambed in June). Lambs were reared with mothers up to 56th day of their life. When lambs were weaned, ewes were milked mechanically twice a day up to the dry period. Once a month collective milk samples were drawn from six sheep from each group in order to determine the concentration of melatonin. Milk yields were subjected to individual checks every 10 days. The studies demonstrated that sheep lambed in February (Group I) displayed the highest milk yields in the milking period (37.8 ± 8.1 l). The milk performance of the two other groups was lower and amounted to 30.2 ± 9.4 litres in case of sheep lambed in June and to 29.2 ± 7.6 litres in sheep with melatonin implants. The introduction of melatonin signal to produce a short-day condition in state of high pregnancy in ewes caused a drop of milk yields both in the period of lambs raising and during milking.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Agricultural University in Krakow, Department of Swine and Small Ruminants Breeding, Biotechnology and Genomics Laboratory, Krakow, Poland
2 National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Genetic Resources Conservation, Balice, Poland
3 The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Endocrinology, Jablonna, Poland