Abstract

Low applications of inorganic fertilizer and decline in soil organic matter often contribute to loss of production in Sub-Saharan Africa. A trial was conducted on integrated soil fertility management of teff (Eragrostis tef) in Southern Ethiopia during the main cropping season of 2015. Treatments were based on recommended rates of inorganic fertilizer, applying organic fertilizer to provide the equivalent amount of N. Randomised treatments were replicated across six farms, including 100% as inorganic fertilizer, and inorganic and organic fertilizers in ratios 50:50, 67:33 and 33:67. All crop characteristics measured, except number of tillers and straw yield, showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). An inorganic-to-organic fertilizer ratio of 67:33 provided highest grain yield, while lowest total variable costs were obtained with the 33:67 ratio. Highest net benefit (520(±50) US$/ha) was obtained with the ratio 67:33, but the marginal rate of return over the 33:67 treatment was only 54(±8)%, and so did not provide sufficient return on the extra investment for inorganic fertilizer. Therefore, 33% inorganic fertilizer to 67% organic fertilizer is more economically viable. These trials demonstrate that, in addition to reducing long-term soil degradation, integrated soil fertility management can be an economically viable way of managing crops.

Details

Title
Integrated soil fertility management for sustainable teff (Eragrostistef) production in Halaba, Southern Ethiopia
Author
Werede, Mulugeta Habte 1 ; Smith, Jo U 2 ; Ambaye, Shiferaw Boke 1 

 Natural Resource Research Directorate, Southern Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Hawassa, Ethiopia 
 School of Biological Science, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, UK 
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Jan 2018
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
e-ISSN
23311932
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2169555914
Copyright
© 2018 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.