It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Understanding the behaviour of humpback whale mother-calf pairs and the acoustic environment on their breeding grounds is fundamental to assessing the biological and ecological requirements needed to ensure a successful migration and survival of calves. Therefore, on a breeding/resting ground, Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia, we used animal-borne DTAGs to quantify the fine-scale behaviour and energetic expenditure of humpback whale mothers and calves, while sound recorders measured the acoustic environment. We show that: (i) lactating humpback whales keep their energy expenditure low by devoting a significant amount of time to rest, and their use of energy, inferred from respiration rates, is ~half than that of adults on their foraging grounds; (ii) lactating females mainly rest while stationary at shallow depths within reach of the hull of commercial ships, thus increasing the potential for ship strike collisions; (iii) the soundscape is dominated by biological sources; and (iv) even moderate increases of noise from vessels will decrease the communication range of humpback whales. Planned commercial infrastructure in Exmouth Gulf will cause a substantial increase in shipping traffic with the risk of ship strikes and acoustic disturbance potentially compromising energy reserves for the southern migration of humpback whales.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Murdoch University, Cetacean Research Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch, Australia (GRID:grid.1025.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0436 6763); University of Hawaii at Manoa, Marine Mammal Research Program, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Kaneohe, United States (GRID:grid.410445.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 0957); Murdoch University, Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch, Australia (GRID:grid.1025.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0436 6763)
2 Aarhus University, Zoophysiology, Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
3 Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Greenland Climate Research Centre, Nuuk, Greenland (GRID:grid.424543.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0741 5039)
4 Murdoch University, Cetacean Research Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch, Australia (GRID:grid.1025.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0436 6763)
5 Aarhus University, Zoophysiology, Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722); Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 6B, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b)