Abstract
Introduction: This study was performed with nurses who provide care for an intercultural population with the objective of determining intercultural communication competence of nurses who provide care for patients from different cultures.
Material and Method: Data were collected from 204 nurses using a Nurse Identification Form, the Intercultural Awareness Scale, Intercultural Sensitivity Scale and Intercultural Effectiveness Scale. As part of the study, nurses' introductory characteristics were presented as percentile, mean or median values. A regression analysis and manova test were used to review the intercultural awareness, sensitivity and effectiveness levels according to the descriptive characteristics of the nurses.
Result: Nurses' had high Intercultural Awareness, Intercultural Sensitivity and Intercultural Effectiveness scale scores. It was found that the scores obtained from the Intercultural Awareness, Intercultural Sensitivity and Intercultural Effectiveness scales do not show a difference according to the descriptive characteristics of the nurses.
Conclusion: Within the scope of intercultural communication competence, high scores received from the intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity and intercultural effectiveness scales demonstrated that the working nurses had good intercultural communication competence.
Key Words: intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity, intercultural effectiveness, intercultural nursing, intercultural communication.
Introduction
The gradual increase in cultural diversification that currently takes place - as it also has been in the past, and the fact that people from different groups have to live together has given birth to the notion of "intercultural communication" (Cakir 2010). Intercultural communication is the process of interaction between patients and healthcare professionals from different cultural backgrounds that is based on an understanding of their respective cultures. Intercultural communication is the basis of a competent intercultural care. Intercultural communication competence needs to be improved so that cultural differences of interacted individuals from different cultures can be recognized, respected, handled with toleration, and effective communication in diverse cultural settings may be established (Bayik 2011, Chan & Sy 2016, Henderson, Barker, & Mak 2016).
Improving intercultural communication competence follows certain stages. Intercultural awareness is acquired in the first stage, intercultural sensitivity in the second and intercultural effectiveness in the third (Kartari 2014). Developing culturallycompetent care and communication as a component of a holistic approach to care is a priority in healthcare facilities. Each individual is a bio-psycho- and socio-cultural entity.
Healthcare professionals should be sensitive towards cultural differences and take such differences into account in their practices to ensure that patients receive a holistic and high-quality care. Free movement of people across countries in our globalizing world makes the culturally-competent approach necessary for meeting the requirements of individuals who are in need of health care.
Carried out to determine the intercultural communication competence of nurses in Turkey, this study is the first in the relevant literature.
Background
Fusing the concepts of culture and communication, the notion of intercultural communication is the process of interaction between patients and healthcare professionals from different cultural backgrounds that is based on an understanding of their respective cultures (Kartari 1999, Bayik 2011, Akova 2016). In the process of communication an individual builds with other individual(s), how the individual perceives and interprets the incoming messages and the approach the individual adopts to find an effective solution to the problems encountered within the society is affected by the culture of the society the individual was born to and grown in, and these are considered within the context of intercultural communication (Kartari 1999, Bozkaya & Aydın 2010, Ozdemir 2011).
Chen and Starosta reported in their intercultural communication competence model that the model involved three dimensions including cognitive, affective and behavioral aspects. The cognitive dimension of intercultural competence encompasses intercultural awareness, the affective dimension includes intercultural sensitivity, and the behavioral dimension covers intercultural effectiveness. Chen and Starosta described that the objective of the model was to have individuals recognize cultural difference of others, and approach with tolerance and respect to them (Chen & Starosta 1996).
As the professionals who spend the longest time with patients, nurses have the responsibility of being capable of building effective communications with and provide holistic care to individuals from different cultures (Chen & Wang 2015). Nurses with intercultural communication competence are aware of an individual's similarities and differences relative to other cultures, and can understand how the individual's own culture and cultures of other individuals involved in the communication will influence the thoughts and behaviors. They exhibit sensitivity towards cultural differences and perspectives of people from other cultures, and build effective communication (Chen & Starosta 1996, Henderson, Barker, & Mak 2016).
With intercultural communication competence, the quality of care steps up, patient safety is ensured, an effective communication is established between the patient and healthcare professionals, work stress of caregivers decreases, and their knowledge and skills improve, while satisfaction perceived by recipients of care increases (Crawford 2017, Hemberg & Vilander 2017, Tanriverdi 2017). Incidents of cultural differences between the recipients and givers of care are inevitable thanks to globalization tendencies. These aspects are crucial as nurses will provide service to populations with ever-increasing heterogeneity.
The results of the studies, which aimed to identify the problems experienced by healthcare professional when providing care for patients from different cultures, indicate that the issues that most frequently cause difficulties were the language barrier and dialect and accent differences. The results also indicate that nurses felt incompetent with the fear of being misunderstood because they were unable to build effective communication with patients. According to the results, because of these problems nurses experience, patients receive poor quality nursing care and insufficient information (Jirwe, Gerrish, & Emami 2010, Hudelson, Perron, & Perneger 2011, Plaza Del Pino, Soriano, & Higginbottom 2013, Henderson, Barker, & Mark 2016).
This study was performed to determine intercultural communication competence of nurses providing care for patients from different cultures.
Methodology
Design
The study was planned as a descriptive and methodological study with the aim of determining intercultural communication competence of nurses providing care for patients from different cultures. It was performed with nurses employed in a private hospital between October 2012 and January 2013. Sixty percent of the patient population treated in the facility where the study took place are foreign patients from different cultural backgrounds. Oncology, bone marrow transplantation and pediatric cardiovascular surgery are the main areas where most of the provided care takes place.
Participants
The sample of the study included 204 nurses who agreed to take part in the study, have completed clinical orientation program, are able to provide patient care independently and are actively involved in the care of patients from different cultures.
Data Collection
The Nurse Identification Form, which was prepared by the investigator and includes 21 questions, Intercultural Awareness Scale, Intercultural Sensitivity Scale and Intercultural Effectiveness Scale were used to collect data.
Intercultural Awareness Scale is a 9-item scale developed by Rozaimie et al. that measures intercultural awareness. The scale includes pre-existing cultural awareness, perceived cultural awareness and cultural communication awareness subscales. It has a 5-point Likert-type rating system (Rozaimie et al. 2011). The validity and reliability work of the scale in Turkish was performed by Karabuga and Alpar (2017). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found 0.73 and test-retest correlation coefficient was found 0.89 in their study. The scale was collected in one subdimension different from the original form and it was found 9 items in total as same as the original scale. General fit coefficients were X2/sd: 1.64; CFI: 1.00, RMSEA: .019 and SRMR: 0.053.
Intercultural Sensitivity Scale: It is a 24-item scale developed by Chen and Starosta and includes five affective subscales required for intercultural sensitivity. The scale has the following subscales: responsibility in communication, respect to cultural differences, self-confidence in communication, communication enjoyment and care in communication. It has a 5-point Likert-type rating system (Chen & Starosta 2000). The validity and reliability work of the scale in Turkish was performed by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardıç (2011). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found 0.72 and content validity index was found 0.86 in their study.
Intercultural Effectiveness Scale: It was developed by Portalla and Chen to evaluate intercultural effectiveness of university students. Recognized as the behavioral dimension of intercultural communication competence, the scale has six subscales: behavioral flexibility, relaxation in communication, respect in communication, message skills, management in communication and identity maintenance (Portalla & Chen 2010). The validity and reliability work of the scale in Turkish was performed by Karabuga and Alpar (2017). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found 0.85 and test-retest correlation coefficient was found 0.71 in their study. The scale consists of 24 items in total and the same subdimension as the original. General fit coefficients were; /2/sd: 1.66; CFI: 0.98, RMSEA: .059 and SRMR: 0.077.
The data were evaluated digitally and an error margin of 0.05 was considered for the study. As part of the study, nurses' introductory characteristics were presented as percentile, mean or median values. A regression analysis and manova test were used to review the intercultural awareness, sensitivity and effectiveness levels according to the descriptive characteristics of the nurses.
Ethical Considerations
Letters of approval were received from the Ethics Board for Non-interventional Clinical Trials of the Health Sciences Institute of Marmara University, as well as from Rozaimie OA for Intercultural Awareness Scale and from Guo-Ming Chen for Intercultural Effectiveness Scale prior to initiation of the study. The participants were explained the purpose, schedule and benefits of the study, and their written consents were obtained before they completed the questionnaires.
Results
The nurses had a mean age of 28.73±4.56 years, the majority of them were female (92.6%) and more than half of them were married (55%). When their professional experience was examined, they had a mean experience of 3.40±2.78 years in their current hospitals, and total years of professional experience of 6.87±5.15 years. Most of the nurses (64%) in the facility had bachelor's degree, and 52% of them spoke English as a foreign language. In the facility which serves mostly to patients from different cultures (60%), 84% of the nurses told that they were willing to provide care for patients from different cultures, and 82% of them told that they were willing to be in the same setting as patients from different cultures (Table 1).
Of the nurses, 84.5% told that they haven't received training on "Intercultural Nursing". Describing that language barrier (94.6%) was the main issue that they experienced most problems with when providing care for patients from different cultures, nurses told that they obtained their knowledge on the cultural structures of foreign patients mostly from their previous experience (47.5%) and from their friends (41.7%), respectively. They listed the topics they wanted to be supported to be able to offer culturally-competent care as "Sufficient number interpreters with adequate training" (78%) and "In-service trainings on the subject" (63.7%) (Table 1).
It was found that the scores obtained from the Intercultural Awareness, Intercultural Sensitivity and Intercultural Effectiveness scales do not show a difference according to gender (Wilks a= .99; F3499= .57; p=.63; T) " = .01), marital status(Wilks a= .99; F3495= .74; p=.53; t]2 = .01), parents'attitude (Wilks л= .98; F6, 342= .46; p=.84; t]2= .01), willingness to provide care for patients from different cultures (Wilks a= .96; F3 192= 2.50; p=.06; r¡2 = .04), willingness to be in the same setting as patients from different cultures (Wilks ,\= .98; F3, 196= 1.67; p=.18; tj2 = .03), knowledge of foreing language (Wilks a= .97; F3 197= 1.95; p=.12; t)2= .03); number of children (Piliai Trace= .07; F62i 2= 1.24; p=.29; rj2 = .03), level of education (Piliai Trace= .04; F9 594= .88; p=.29; rj2= .01), settlements where nurses live their lives (Piliai Trace= .02; F6 394= .65; p=.69; 7]2 = .01), settlements where nurses' families live their lives (Piliai Trace= .01; F6 394= .44; p=.85; ??:= .01), the status of nurses' training in intercultural nursing care (Piliai Trace= .01; F3 197= .89; p=.45; r)2= .01) (Table 2).
Discussion
The study demonstrated that the nurses had the desired level of competence in intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity and intercultural effectiveness, i.e. the sub-dimensions of intercultural communication.
The lowest and highest possible scores from the intercultural awareness scale are 9 and 45, respectively. Lower scores indicate that the individual has intercultural awareness (Rozaimie et al. 2011). The scale does not have a cut-off point. Nurses' mean score from the intercultural awareness scale was 17.84 (Table 3). Patients with intercultural awareness know that culture is defined in a different way for each individual, they try to fill the gap resulting from intercultural differences, acknowledge the differences and avoid engaging in interpersonal conflict (Kartari 2014). Because there are scarcely any studies to determine nurses' level intercultural awareness, the results of the present study could not be compared with literature reports.
The lowest and highest possible scores from the intercultural sensitivity scale are 24 and 120, respectively. Higher scores from the scale indicate that the individual has intercultural sensitivity. The scale does not have a cut-off point. Nurses' mean score from the intercultural sensitivity scale was 76.77 (Table 3). In their study to determine intercultural sensitivities of nursing students, Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic (2011) found an intercultural sensitivity score of 77.58. Similarly, in their study to determine intercultural sensitivities of vocational health high school student, Bulduk, Usta and Dincer (2017) found an intercultural sensitivity score of 88.94. The results of our study are consistent with those of the previously performed studies.
Individuals with high intercultural sensitivity do not avoid communicating with culturally different individuals, and it can be stated that they do not make hasty decisions when interpreting individuals. They tend to be sensitive enough to collect as much information as possible on individuals with different cultural characteristics and to understand the essence of their cultural differences. They do not tend to regard their cultures superior to other cultures. They enjoy interacting with individuals from different cultures (Rengi & Polat 2014).
The lowest and highest possible scores from the intercultural effectiveness scale are 20 and 100, respectively. Higher scores indicate that the individual has intercultural effectiveness. The scale does not have a cut-off point. Nurses' mean score from the intercultural effectiveness scale was 64.67 (Table 3). Because there are scarcely any studies to determine nurses' level intercultural effectiveness, the results of the present study could not be compared with literature reports.
The facility where the study took place has a high proportion of foreign patients. According to year 2013 Medical Tourism report, it ranks first in the list of top 10 hospitals with highest proportion of foreign patient presentations (Kaya et al. 2013). Of the nurses employed in this hospital, 84% told that they were willing to provide care for patients from different cultures, and 82% of them told that they were willing to be in the same setting as patients from different cultures. It can be stated that being in the same setting with the patients from different cultures and taking interest in diversity, and interpersonal transfer of these experiences forms the groundwork of effective conduct of intercultural nursing care.
Of the nurse group, 47.5% told that they obtained their knowledge on the cultural structures of foreign patients from their previous experience, and 41.7% from their friends. According to the study by Wong, Murphy and Adelman (2009), which investigated the problems encountered by nurses providing care for patients from different cultures, 88.3% of the nurses obtained their knowledge on patients' cultural structures from the previous experiences they had, and 75.5% from their friends. The results of the two studies are similar. Plaza del Pino, Soriano and Higginbottom (2013) reported that the main way of obtaining knowledge on the cultural structures of patients was to provide care in health and disease processes for individuals coming from different cultures and to experience this process personally.
Describing that language barrier (94.6%) was the issue that they experienced most problems with when providing care for patients from different cultures, nurses told that there should be a "sufficient number interpreters with adequate training" (78%) and "in-service trainings on the subject" (63.7%) to be able to offer culturally-competent care. Similarly, in the results of the study by Wong, Murphy and Adelman (2009) availability of quantitatively and qualitatively sufficient interpreters and inservice training on the subject were what nurses thought are necessary to offer culturally-competent care. Douglas et al. (2014) reported that interpreters should be trained to build effective communication, and Singleton and Elizabeth (2009) described that interpreters should have competences that fit patient's cultural structure, that they should assist the nurse in finding out the cultural structure of the patient, and that they should be trained in medical translation.
For an effective communication through interpreters, it is important that interpreters should be of the same sex with the patients, they should be introduced to the patient, should pay attention to eye contact, should periodically repeat what is being narrated, should not use medical terms, and that the training documents given to the patients should be translated into the patient's language (AHEC Clear Health Communication Program 2015). In the facility where this study was performed, care is taken to have an interpreter available who is familiar with the traits of the culture of each patient and have lived as a part of that culture. Feedback is received in all cases for the information and trainings provided through interpreters. Training documents, warning signs and information brochures have been translated into several languages for patients from different cultures.
Of the nurses, 84.5% told that did not receive training on intercultural nursing. Previous studies have reported that educational initiatives were effective in improving nurses' cultural competence (Kiviharju & Koivumaki 2012, Gallagher 2011, Berlin, Nilsson, & Tornkvist 2010) while the study by Festini et al. (2009) emphasized that universities and professional work settings should include an ongoing process to train nurses and nursing students on intercultural nursing, cultural differences and cultural competence.
Because our country has been receiving more immigrants recently as a result of political developments that took place in the world and since there is an increasing demand from outside the country to healthcare services with increasing quality, intercultural nursing course has been a part of universities' curriculum but only a few years now. For students to develop culturally-competent care skills, nursing instructors should plan their training schedules taking into account "Culturally-Competent Nursing Standards of Care-Giving" (Bayik 2011, Douglas et al. 2014).
Conclusion and Recommendation
Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that programs to improve cultural competences of healthcare staff be provided, and clinical services be reviewed with respect to cultural competence in healthcare facilities, and that new studies with new nursing groups be performed to use intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity and intercultural effectiveness scales to evaluate intercultural communication competence, so that culturally competent care and communication can be achieved in healthcare facilities.
Acknowledgments: We wish to express our appreciation to Awang Rozaimie, Tamra Portalla and Guo-Ming Chen who gave us permission to develop and to use the Turkish version of the "Intercultural Awareness Scale" and "Intercultural Effectiveness Scale" and provided advanced support during the process of development. We also thank all participants for their cooperation in this study.
Correspondence: Hatice Karabuga Yakar, Assistant Professor, PhD' Faculty of Health Sciences at Marmara University, E-mail: [email protected]
References
AHEC Clear Health Communication Programme (2015) Available https://medicine .osu. edu/orgs/ahec/chcp/modul econtent/pages/effectiveverbalandwrittencomm unicationswiththosefromothercultures.aspx
Akova, S. (2016) Intercultural communication and cultural awareness creation: From local to global municipal dialogue, Istanbul Maltepe Municipality sample. Journal of Academic Social Research, 4:26; 416-28.
Bayik, T.A. (2011) Globalization and internationalization in nursing education. DEUHYO ED 4(3):144-150.
Berlin, A., Nilsson, G., & TOrnkvist, L. (2010) Cultural competence among Swedish child health nurses after specific training: A randomized trial. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(3), 381-391.
Bozkaya, M., & Aydın, I.E. (2010) Intercultural communication concern: Anadolu University Erasmus students exchange program example. 29-42.
Bulduk, S., Tosun, H., & Ardıc, E. (2011) Measurement of the Turkish Intercultural Sensitivity Scale in nursing students. Turkey Clinics J Med Ethics. 19(1):25-31.
Bulduk, S., Usta, E., & Dinçer, Y. (2017) Determination of intercultural susceptibility and influencing factors: An example of a health care professional college. Duzce University Journal of Health Sciences Institute .7(2): 73-77.
Chan, J.C., & Sy, P.Y. (2016) The relationships among personality, intercultural communication, and cultural self-efficacy in nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Research 24(4):286-90.
Chen, G.M., & Starosta, W.J. (1996) Intercultural communication competence: A Synthesis Communication Yearbook. 19:353-383. In Ustun E (Ed.), Factors Affecting the Intercultural Sensitivity and Ethnicity of Teacher Teachers. Yıldız Technical University Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences.
Chen, G.M., Starosta, W.J. (2000) The development and validation of the intercultural Communication Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication 3:1-15.
Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2015) Cultural competence experiences which Chinese nurses have in Finland. Laurea University of Applied Sciences.
Crawford, T., Candlin, S., & Roger, P. (2017) New perspectives on understanding cultural diversity in nurse-patient communication. Collegian 24:63-69.
Cakir, M. (2010) One aspect of cross-cultural communication: the alienation of the essence by marginalization. Journal of Tourism Research 21(1): 75-84.
Douglas, M.K., Rosenkoetter, M., Pacquiao, D., Callister, L., Pollara M, Launderdale, J., Miilstead J., Nardi, D., Purnell L. (2011) Standards of Practice for Culturally Competent Nursing Care: 2011Update. Journal of Trancsultural Nursing 22-317-332.
Festini, F., Focardi, S., Bisogni, Si., Mannini, C., & Neri, S. (2009) Providing transcultural to children and parents: An exploratory study from Italy. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 41(2):220-227.
Gallagher, R. W. (2011) A meta-analysis of cultural competence education in professional nurses and nursing students. (Unpublished dissertation). University of South Florida, Scholar Commons.
Hemberg, J.A.V., & Vilander, S. (2017) Cultural and communicative competence in the caring relationship with patients from another culture. Scandinivian Journal of Caring Sciences 31: 822-29.
Henderson, S., Barker, M., & Mak, A. (2016). Strategies used by nurses, academics and students to overcome intercultural communication challenges. Nurse Education in Practice 71-78.
Hudelson, P., Perron, N., & Perneger, T. (2011) Self-assessment of intercultural communication skills: A survey of physicians and medical students in Geneva, Switzerland. BMC Medical Education 11: 2-9.
Jirwe, M., Gerrish, K., & Emami, K. (2010) Student nurses' experiences of communication in cross-cultural care encounters. Scand J Caring Sci 24: 436-444.
Karabuga Yakar, H., Ecevit Alpar, S. (2017) Determining the reliability and validity of intercultural awareness and intercultural effectiveness scales. Journal of Human Sciences 14(3), 2748-2761.
Kartari, A. (1999) Intercultural communication and a research project. Folklore, Literature 1(17): 19-26.
Kartari, A. (2014) Culture, difference and communication. Conceptual bases of intercultural communication. Communication publications, Istanbul.
Kaya, S., Yildirim, H., Karsavuran, S., & Ozer, O. (2013) Evaluation Report on Medical Tourism in Turkey. Available https://www. researchgate. net/profile/Oezlem_Oez er/publication/260754463_Evaluation_Report_ on_Medical_Tourism_in_Turkey_2013_Turki ye_Medikal_Turizm_Degerlendirme_Raporu_ 2013/links/
Kiviharju, J., & Katja, Koivumaki. (2012) Educational interventions to improve nurses' and nursing students' cultural competence - A literature review. Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki.
Ozdemir, İ. (2011) Kültürlerarası iletişimin önemi. Folklor, Edebiyat 17(66):29-38.
Plaza Del Pino, F., Soriano, E., & Higginbottom, G. (2013) Sociocultural and linguistic boundaries influencing intercultural communication between nurses and Moroccan patients in southern Spain: A focused ethnography. BMC Nursing 12: 2-8.
Portalla, T., Chen, G.M. (2010) The development and validation of the Intercultural Effectiveness Scale. Intercultural Communication Studies 3:21-37.
Rengi, O., & Polat, S.(2014) Classroom teachers' perception of cultural diversity and intercultural sensitivities.Journal of World of Turks 6(3): 135-156.
Rozaimie, A., Shuib, A., Ali, A.J., Oii, B., & Siang, C. (2011) Multicultural awareness for better ways of life: A scale validation among Malaysian undergraduate students. 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceeding.
Singleton, K., & Elizabeth, K. (2009) Understanding cultural and linguistic barriers to health literacy. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 14(3).
Tanriverdi, G. (2017) Approaches and suggestions for improving cultural competence in nurses. Florence Nightingale Nursing Journal 25(3):227-36.
Wong, C., Murphy, S., & Adelman, T. (2009) Nursing responses to transcultural encounters: What nurses draw on when faced with a patient from another culture. Perm J 13(3): 31-37.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was performed with nurses who provide care for an intercultural population with the objective of determining intercultural communication competence of nurses who provide care for patients from different cultures. Material and Method: Data were collected from 204 nurses using a Nurse Identification Form, the Intercultural Awareness Scale, Intercultural Sensitivity Scale and Intercultural Effectiveness Scale. As part of the study, nurses' introductory characteristics were presented as percentile, mean or median values. A regression analysis and manova test were used to review the intercultural awareness, sensitivity and effectiveness levels according to the descriptive characteristics of the nurses. Result: Nurses' had high Intercultural Awareness, Intercultural Sensitivity and Intercultural Effectiveness scale scores. It was found that the scores obtained from the Intercultural Awareness, Intercultural Sensitivity and Intercultural Effectiveness scales do not show a difference according to the descriptive characteristics of the nurses. Conclusion: Within the scope of intercultural communication competence, high scores received from the intercultural awareness, intercultural sensitivity and intercultural effectiveness scales demonstrated that the working nurses had good intercultural communication competence.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences at Marmara University, Turkey
2 Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences at Marmara University, Turkey