It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The coordination of axial thorax and pelvis rotations during gait has been shown to be affected by several pathologies. This has been interpreted as an indication of increased apparent axial trunk stiffness, but arm swing may also affect these rotations. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of trunk stiffness and arm swing on the relative timing (‘coordination’) between thorax and pelvis rotations, and to assess if apparent trunk stiffness can be inferred from thorax-pelvis kinematics. A forward dynamic model was constructed to estimate apparent trunk stiffness from observed thorax and pelvis rotations and arm swing moment around the longitudinal axis of the trunk of 30 subjects. The effect of independent manipulations of trunk stiffness and arm swing moment on thorax-pelvis coordination and gain of axial thorax-pelvis rotations were assessed using the same forward dynamic model. A linear regression model was constructed to evaluate whether forward dynamic model-based estimates of axial trunk stiffness could be inferred directly from thorax-pelvis rotations. The forward dynamic model revealed that axial trunk stiffness and arm swing moment have opposite effects on axial thorax-pelvis coordination. Apparent axial trunk stiffness could not be predicted from observed thorax-pelvis rotations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Military Rehabilitation Centre ‘Aardenburg’, Research and Development, Doorn, The Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.438049.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0824 9343)
2 Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.438049.2); Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fujian, P.R. China (GRID:grid.256112.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 9307)
3 Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.256112.3); Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fujian, P.R. China (GRID:grid.256112.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 9307)
4 Military Rehabilitation Centre ‘Aardenburg’, Research and Development, Doorn, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.256112.3); HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.438049.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0824 9343)
5 Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.438049.2)