It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Culture contamination, end-product toxicity, and energy efficient product recovery are long-standing bioprocess challenges. To solve these problems, we propose a high-pressure fermentation strategy, coupled with in situ extraction using the abundant and renewable solvent supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2), which is also known for its broad microbial lethality. Towards this goal, we report the domestication and engineering of a scCO2-tolerant strain of Bacillus megaterium, previously isolated from formation waters from the McElmo Dome CO2 field, to produce branched alcohols that have potential use as biofuels. After establishing induced-expression under scCO2, isobutanol production from 2-ketoisovalerate is observed with greater than 40% yield with co-produced isopentanol. Finally, we present a process model to compare the energy required for our process to other in situ extraction methods, such as gas stripping, finding scCO2 extraction to be potentially competitive, if not superior.
End-product toxicity, culture contamination, and energy efficient product recovery are long-standing issues in bioprocessing. Here, the authors address these problems using a fermentation strategy that combines microbial production of branched alcohols with supercritical carbon dioxide extraction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Miami University, Department of Chemical, Paper, and Biomedical Engineering, Oxford, USA (GRID:grid.259956.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2195 6763)
2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
3 Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering, Worcester, USA (GRID:grid.268323.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1957 0327)
4 Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering, Worcester, USA (GRID:grid.268323.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1957 0327); University of Bath, Department of Chemical Engineering, Bath, UK (GRID:grid.7340.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 1699)
5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
6 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)