You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
REFERENCESAsada, C., Basnet, S., Otsuka, M., Sasaki, C., & Nakamura, Y. (2015). Epoxy resin synthesis using low molecular weight lignin separated from various lignocellulosic materials. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 74, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.12.039Bahrs, E., & Angenendt, E. (2019). Status quo and perspectives of biogas production for energetic and material applications. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 9–20.Blanco-Canqui, U., & Lal, R. (2007). Soil Structure and organic carbon relations following 10 years of wheat straw management in no-till. Soil & Tillage Research, 95, 240–254.BMBF (2012). Biorefineries Roadmaps part of the German Federal Government action plans for the material and energetic utilisation of renewable raw materials. www.bmbf.de/pub/Roadmap_Biorefineries_eng.pdfBrodi, M., Vallejos, M., Tanase Opedal, M., Area, M. C., & Chinga-Charrasco, G. (2017). Lignocellulosics as sustainable resources for production of bioplastics – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.209Budzianowski, W. M., & Postawa, K. (2016). Total chain integration of sustainable biorefinery systems. Applied Energy, 184, 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.050Budzinski, M., & Nitzsche, R. (2016). Comparative economic and environmental assessment of four beech wood based biorefinery concepts. Bioresource Technology, 216, 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.111Carroll, A., & Somerville, C. (2009). Cellulosic biofuels. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092125ChEBI (2018). ChEBI database (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI)), keyword catechol. Retrieved from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/searchId.do?chebiId=CHEBI:18135Clifton-Brown, J., Harfouche, A., Casler, M. D., Dylan Jones, H., Macalpine, W. J., Murphy-Bokern, D., ... Lewandowski, I. (2018). Breeding progress in the perennial lignocellulosic biomass crops switchgrass, miscanthus, willow and poplar: Readiness to provide hybrids for a sustainable bioeconomy. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 9(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12357.Dahmen, N., Henrich, E., & Henrich, T. (2017). Synthesis Gas Biorefinery. In K.Wagemann & N.Tippkötter (Eds.), Biorefineries (pp. 216-244). Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology 166, T. Scheper (Series editor). Springer International publishing.Dahmen, N., Abeln, J., Eberhard, M., Kolb, T., Leibold, H., Sauer, J., … Zimmerlin, B. (2016). The bioliq process for producing transportation fuels. Wires Energy and Environment, 6(3), e236. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.236Dahmen, N., Pfitzer, C., Sauer, J., Tröger, N., Weirich, F., Günther, A., & Müller-Hagedorn, M. (2016). Fast Pyrolysis of wheat straw in the bioliq pilot plant. Energy & Fuels, 30, 8047–8054.Daioglou, V., Stehfest, E., Wicke, B., Faaij, A., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2016). Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 8, 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12285Dornburg, V., vanVuuren, D., van deVen, G., Langeveld, H., Meeusen, M., Banse, M., Faaij, A. (2010). Bioenergy revisited: Key factors in global potentials of bioenergy. Energy & Environmental Science, 3, 258–267.Dörsam, S., Kirchhoff, J., Bigalke, M., Dahmen, N., Syldatk, C., & Ochsenreither, K. (2016). Evaluation of pyrolysis oil as carbon source for fungal fermentation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 2059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02059Elbersen, B., VanVerzandvoort, M., Boogaard, S., Mucher, S., Cicarelli, T., Elbersen, W., … Eleftheriadis, I. (2018). Definition and classification of marginal lands suitable for industrial crops in Europe (EU deliverable-not published yet) (No. 2.1). WUR. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research.Fabbrini, F., Ludovisi, R., Alasia, O., Flexas, J., Douthe, C., Ribas Cabro, M., … Harfouche, A. (2019) Phenotypic characterization of biomass traits across a broad Euro-Mediterranean ecotypic panel of the lignocellulosic feedstock Arundo donax. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 153–171.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)(2014). Yearbook of forest products 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3732m/i3732m.pdfHarmsen, P., & Hackmann, M. (2013). Green building blocks for biobased plastics – Biobased processes and market development, report of Wageningen UR Food & Biobased Research. ISBN, 978-94-6173-610-9.Hoeber, S., Arranz, K., Nordh, N. E., Baum, C., Low, M., Nock, C., … Weih, M. (2018). Genotype identity has a more important influence than genotype diversity on aboveground biomass productivity in a willow short rotation coppice. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 10(8), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12521Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., Eickhout, B., Devries, B., & Turkenburg, W. (2005). Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29(4), 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.05.002Horlamus, F., Wittgens, A., Noll, P., Michler, J., Müller, I., Weggenmann, F., … Hausmann, R. (2018). One-step bioconversion of hemicellulose polymers to rhamnolipids with Cellvibrio japonicus: A proof-of-concept for a potential host strain in future bioeconomy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12542IEA Bioenergy (2017). Mapping biorefineries in Europe, EU BIC/BBI – Nova Institute. Retrieved from: http://task42.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MappingBiorefineriesAppendix_171219.pdfKolfschoten, R. C., Bruins, M. E., & Sanders, J. P. M. (2014). Opportunities for small-scale biorefinery for production of sugar and ethanol in the Netherlands. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 8(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1487Kumar, D. (2014). Biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: Experimental, enzymatic hydrolysis modeling, techno-economic and life cycle assessment studies. Retrieved from: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/53760Lange, J., Müller, F., Bernecker, K., Dahmen, N., Takors, R., & Blombach, B. (2017). Valorization of Pyrolysis Water – a Biorefinery Side Stream – for 1,2-Propanediol Production with engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnology for Biofuels., 10, 277. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0969-8Lange, J., Müller, F., Takors, R., & Blombach, B. (2018). Harnessing novel chromosomal integration loci to utilize an organosolv-derived hemicellulose fraction for isobutanol production with engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbial Biotechnology, 11, 257–263.Lask, J., Wagner, M., Trindade, L., & Lewandowski, I. (2019). Life cycle assessment of ethanol production from miscanthus: A comparison of production pathways at two European sites. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12551Laure, S., Leschinsky, M., Fröhling, M., Schultmann, F., & Unkelbach, G. (2014). Assessment of an organosolv lignocellulose biorefinery concept based on a material flow analysis of a pilot plant. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 48(9–10), 793–798.Lewandowski, I. (2013). Soil carbon and biofuels: Multifunctionality of ecosystem services. In R.Lal, K.Lorenz, R. F.Hüttl, B. U.Schneider, & J.vonBraun (Eds.), Ecosystem services and carbon sequestration in the biosphere (pp. 333–356). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Lewandowski, I. (2015). Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. Global Food Security, 6, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001Lewandowski, I. (2016). The role of perennial biomass crops in a growing bioeconomy. In S.Barth, D.Murphy-Bokern, O.Kalinina, G.Taylor, & M.Jones (Eds.), Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world (pp. 3–13). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Lewandowski, I., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2006). Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.003Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J., Trindade, L. M., Van DerLinden, G., Schwarz, K.-U., Müller-Sämann, K., … Donnison, I. S. (2016). Progress on optimizing miscanthus biomass production for the European bioeconomy: Results of the EU FP7 project OPTIMISC. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01620Mangold, A., Lewandowski, I., & Kiesel, A. (2019a). Miscanthus for biogas production: Influence of harvest date and ensiling on digestibility and methane hectare yield. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 50–62.Mangold, A., Lewandowski, I., & Kiesel, A. (2019b). Influence of leaf and stem of miscanthus on methane hectare yield. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12549Memon, M. S., Guo, J., Tagar, A. A., Perveen, N., Ji, C., Memon, S. A., & Memon, N. (2018). The effects of tillage and straw incorporation on soil organic carbon status, rice crop productivity, and sustainability in the rice-wheat cropping system of Eastern China. Sustainability, 10, 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040961Nanda, S., Azargohar, R., Dailai, A. K., & Kozinski, J. A. (2015). An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.058Nikolakopoulos, A., & Kokossis, A. (2017). A problem decomposition approach for developing total water networks in lignocellulosic biorefineries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 109, 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.12.007Paul, S., & Dutta, A. (2018). Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 130, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.005Piotrowski, S., Essel, R., Carus, M., Dammer, L., & Engel, L. (2015). Nachhaltig nutzbare Potenziale für Biokraftstoffe in Nutzungskonkurrenz zur Lebens- und Futtermittelproduktion, Bioenergie sowie zur stofflichen Nutzung in Deutschland, Europa und der Welt. Retrieved from http://bio-based.eu/downloads/nachhaltig-nutzbare-potenziale-fuer-biokraftstoffe-in-nutzungskonkurrenz-zur-lebens-und-futtermittelproduktion-bioenergie-sowie-zur-stofflichen-nutzung-in-deutschland-europa-und-der-welt/RISE (2015). Roadmap 2015–2025: The pulp mill biorefinery. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ri.se/sites/default/files/files/docs/roadmap_the_pulp_mill_biorefinery.pdfRohde, V., Böringer, S., Tübke, B., Adam, C., Dahmen, N., & Schmiedl, D. (2019) Fractionation of three different lignins by thermal separation techniques—A comparative study. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12546Schäfer, J., Sattler, M., Iqbal, Y., Lewandowski, I., & Bunzel, M. (2019) Characterization of Miscanthus cell wall polymers. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12538Schuler, J., Hornung, U., Dahmen, N., & Sauer, J. (2019). Lignin from bark as a resource for aromatics production by hydrothermal liquefaction. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12562Seibert-Ludwig, D., Hahn, T., Hirth, T., & Zibek, S. (2019). Modified severity factors and statistical tools for selection and optimization of pretreatment methods for miscanthus and poplar raw material. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 171–180.Siebenhaller, S., Hajek, T., Muhle-Goll, C., Himmelsbach, M., Luy, B., Kirschhöfer, F., … Syldatk, C. (2017). Beechwood carbohydrates for enzymatic synthesis of sustainable glycolipids. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0155-7Smeets, E., Faaij, A., Lewandowski, I., & Turkenburg, W. (2007). A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33(1), 56–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.001https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.001Sticklen, M. (2008). Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: Towards affordable cellulosic ethanol. NatureReviews|genetics, 9, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2336Straathof, A. (2014). Transformation of biomass into commodity chemicals using enzymes or cells. Chemical Reviews, 114, 1871–1908. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400309cThe High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE). (2013). Biofuels and food security. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2952e.pdfToor, S. S., Rosendahl, L., & Rudolf, A. (2011). Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies. Energy, 36, 2328–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013Tóth, G., Montanarella, L., & Rusco, E. (2008). Threats to soil quality in Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports EUR 23438 EN. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy.Wagner, M., Mangold, A., Lask, J., Petig, E., Kiesel, A., & Lewandowski, I. (2019). Economic and environmental performance of miscanthus cultivated on marginal land for biogas production. Special Issue ‘Biobased value chains for a growing bioeconomy’ of GCB-Bioenergy. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12567Wells, T., Kosa, M., & Ragauskas, A. J. (2013). Polymerization of Kraft lignin via ultrasonication for high-molecular-weight applications. UltrasonicsSonochemistry, 20, 1463–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.05.001Zhang, K., Pei, Z., & Wang, D. (2016). Organic solvent pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and biochemicals: A review. Bioresource Technology, 199, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.102
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Lignocellulose is the most abundant biomass on Earth, with an estimated 181.5 billion tonnes produced annually. Of the 8.2 billion tonnes that are currently used, about 7 billion tonnes are produced from dedicated agricultural, grass and forest land and another 1.2 billion tonnes stem from agricultural residues. Economic and environmentally efficient pathways for production and utilization of lignocellulose for chemical products and energy are needed to expand the bioeconomy. This opinion paper arose from the research network “Lignocellulose as new resource platform for novel materials and products” funded by the German federal state of Baden-Württemberg and summarizes original research presented in this special issue. It first discusses how the supply of lignocellulosic biomass can be organized sustainably and suggests that perennial biomass crops (PBC) are likely to play an important role in future regional biomass supply to European lignocellulosic biorefineries. Dedicated PBC production has the advantage of delivering biomass with reliable quantity and quality. The tailoring of PBC quality through crop breeding and management can support the integration of lignocellulosic value chains. Two biorefinery concepts using lignocellulosic biomass are then compared and discussed: the syngas biorefinery and the lignocellulosic biorefinery. Syngas biorefineries are less sensitive to biomass qualities and are technically relatively advanced, but require high investments and large-scale facilities to be economically feasible. Lignocellulosic biorefineries require multiple processing steps to separate the recalcitrant lignin from cellulose and hemicellulose and convert the intermediates into valuable products. The refining processes for high-quality lignin and hemicellulose fractions still need to be further developed. A concept of a modular lignocellulosic biorefinery is presented that could be flexibly adapted for a range of feedstock and products by combining appropriate technologies either at the same location or in a decentralized form.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Details
Title
Integrated lignocellulosic value chains in a growing bioeconomy: Status quo and perspectives
1 Institute of Catalysis Research and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
2 University of Hohenheim, Chair of Biobased Products and Energy Crops (340b), Stuttgart, Germany
3 Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany
4 Coordination Office Bioeconomy Research Program Baden-Württemberg, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany