It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Botryococcus braunii is a colonial microalga that appears early in the fossil record and is a sensitive proxy of environmental and hydroclimatic conditions. Palaeozoic Botryococcus fossils which contribute up to 90% of oil shales and approximately 1% of crude oil, co-localise with diagnostic geolipids from the degradation of source-signature hydrocarbons. However more recent Holocene sediments demonstrate no such association. Consequently, Botryococcus are identified in younger sediments by morphology alone, where potential misclassifications could lead to inaccurate paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Here we show that a combination of flow cytometry and ancient DNA (aDNA) sequencing can unambiguously identify Botryococcus microfossils in Holocene sediments with hitherto unparalleled accuracy and rapidity. The application of aDNA sequencing to microfossils offers a far-reaching opportunity for understanding environmental change in the recent geological record. When allied with other high-resolution palaeoenvironmental information such as aDNA sequencing of humans and megafauna, aDNA from microfossils may allow a deeper and more precise understanding of past environments, ecologies and migrations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 The University of Exeter, Biosciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Exeter, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024)
2 German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.4567.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0483 2525)
3 University of Basel, Physical Geography and Environmental Change Research Group, Basel, Switzerland (GRID:grid.6612.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0642)
4 University of Northern British Columbia, Geography Program and Quesnel River Research Centre, Prince George, Canada (GRID:grid.266876.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 9982)
5 Shell Technology Centre, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.266876.b)
6 The University of Exeter, Biosciences, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Exeter, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024); Shell Technology Centre, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.8391.3)
7 The University of Exeter, Geography, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Exeter, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024)
8 University of New South Wales, Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)