It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In plants mechanical signals pattern morphogenesis through the polar transport of the hormone auxin and through regulation of interphase microtubule (MT) orientation. To date, the mechanisms by which such signals induce changes in cell polarity remain unknown. Through a combination of time-lapse imaging, and chemical and mechanical perturbations, we show that mechanical stimulation of the SAM causes transient changes in cytoplasmic calcium ion concentration (Ca2+) and that transient Ca2+ response is required for downstream changes in PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1) polarity. We also find that dynamic changes in Ca2+ occur during development of the SAM and this Ca2+ response is required for changes in PIN1 polarity, though not sufficient. In contrast, we find that Ca2+ is not necessary for the response of MTs to mechanical perturbations revealing that Ca2+ specifically acts downstream of mechanics to regulate PIN1 polarity response.
Auxin transport and microtubule orientation respond to mechanical stimulation at the shoot apical meristem. Here Li et al. show that mechanical stimulation causes cytosolic calcium concentration transients, and preventing such changes impairs reorientation of the PIN1 auxin efflux carrier, but not of microtubules.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890); California Institute of Technology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
2 The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Darlington, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)
3 California Institute of Technology, Machine Learning and Instrument Autonomy, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
4 California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
5 University of California, San Diego, Division of Biological Sciences, Cell and Developmental Biology Section, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)