It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The transition temperature Tc of unconventional superconductivity is often tunable. For a monolayer of FeSe, for example, the sweet spot is uniquely bound to titanium-oxide substrates. By contrast for La2−xSrxCuO4 thin films, such substrates are sub-optimal and the highest Tc is instead obtained using LaSrAlO4. An outstanding challenge is thus to understand the optimal conditions for superconductivity in thin films: which microscopic parameters drive the change in Tc and how can we tune them? Here we demonstrate, by a combination of x-ray absorption and resonant inelastic x-ray scattering spectroscopy, how the Coulomb and magnetic-exchange interaction of La2CuO4 thin films can be enhanced by compressive strain. Our experiments and theoretical calculations establish that the substrate producing the largest Tc under doping also generates the largest nearest neighbour hopping integral, Coulomb and magnetic-exchange interaction. We hence suggest optimising the parent Mott state as a strategy for enhancing the superconducting transition temperature in cuprates.
The optimal condition for superconductivity is a long-sought issue but remains challenging. Here, Ivashko et al. demonstrate that the compressive strain to La2CuO4 films enhances the Coulomb and magnetic-exchange interactions relevant for superconductivity, providing a strategy to optimise the parent Mott state for superconductivity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Universität Zürich, Physik-Institut, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)
2 Technical University of Denmark, Department of Physics, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark (GRID:grid.5170.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 8870)
3 Paul Scherrer Institut, Photon Science Division, Swiss Light Source, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5991.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 7501)
4 Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fedérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5333.6) (ISNI:0000000121839049)
5 Cornell University, Department of Physics, Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
6 Stanford University, Department of Applied Physics, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
7 University of Geneva, Department of Quantum Matter Physics, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.8591.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 4988)
8 Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Solid State Physics, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.5329.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2348 4034)