It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Amputation in adults is associated with an extensive remapping of cortical topography in primary and secondary sensorimotor areas. Here, we used tactile residual limb stimulation and 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans to investigate functional connectivity changes in the sensorimotor network of patients with long-term lower limb traumatic amputations with phantom sensation, but without pain. We found a pronounced reduction of inter-hemispheric functional connectivity between homologous sensorimotor cortical regions in amputees, including the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory areas, and primary (M1) and secondary (M2) motor areas. We additionally observed an intra-hemispheric increased functional connectivity between primary and secondary somatosensory regions, and between the primary and premotor areas, contralateral to amputation. These functional connectivity changes in specialized small-scale sensory-motor networks improve our understanding of the functional impact of lower limb amputation in the brain. Our findings in a selective group of patients with phantom limb sensations, but without pain suggest that disinhibition of neural inputs following traumatic limb amputation disrupts sensorimotor topology, unbalancing functional brain network organization. These findings step up the description of brain plasticity related with phantom sensations by showing that pain is not critical for sensorimotor network changes after peripheral injury.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.472984.4); Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.8536.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 473X)
2 D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.472984.4); Augusto Motta University (Unisuam), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.472984.4)
3 Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.412211.5)
4 D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.472984.4)
5 D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.472984.4); Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.8536.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 473X); Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), National Centre for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.8536.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 473X)