It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Epistatic interactions of QTLs with the genetic background and QTL-QTL interaction plays an important role in the phenotypic performance of introgression lines developed through genomic-assisted breeding (GAB). In this context, NIL pairs developed with various drought QTL (qDTY) combinations in the genetic background of IR64, TDK1-Sub1 and Savitri backgrounds were utilized to study the interactions. Multi-season phenotyping of NIL pairs harboring similar qDTY combinations provided contrasting performance for grain yield under drought (RS) (classified as high and low yielding NILs) but nearly similar performance under non-stress(NS) conditions. Genome wide genotyping data revealed a total of 16, 5 and 6 digenic interactions were detected under RS conditions in low yielding NILs of IR64, TDK1-Sub1 and Savitri respectively while no significant interaction was found in high yielding NILs under RS and NS conditions in any of the genetic backgrounds used in this study. It is evident from this study that existence of epistatic interactions between QTLs with genetic background, QTL-QTL interaction and interactions among background markers loci itself on different chromosomes influences the expression of a complex trait such as grain yield under drought. The generated information will be useful in all the GAB program of across the crops for precise breeding.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 International Rice Research Institute, Rice Breeding Platform, Metro Manila, Philippines (GRID:grid.419387.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0729 330X)
2 ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India (GRID:grid.419387.0)
3 Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India (GRID:grid.418317.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1787 6463)
4 National Rice Research Institute, Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research station, Hazaribagh, India (GRID:grid.418317.8)
5 ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Tripura Centre, Lembucherra, India (GRID:grid.469932.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2203 3565)
6 Regional Agriculture Research Station, NARC, Bara, Nepal (GRID:grid.466943.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8910 9686)
7 South Asia Hub, ICRISAT, International Rice Research Institute, Patancheru, India (GRID:grid.419337.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9323 1772)
8 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, Patancheru, India (GRID:grid.419337.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9323 1772)