It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The dorsal root ganglia (DRG) contain cell bodies of primary afferent neurons, which are frequently studied by recording extracellularly with penetrating microelectrodes inserted into the DRG. We aimed to isolate single- and multi-unit activity from primary afferents in the lumbar DRG using non-penetrating electrode arrays and to characterize the relationship of that activity with limb position and movement. The left sixth and seventh lumbar DRG (L6-L7) were instrumented with penetrating and non-penetrating electrode arrays to record neural activity during passive hindlimb movement in 7 anesthetized cats. We found that the non-penetrating arrays could record both multi-unit and well-isolated single-unit activity from the surface of the DRG, although with smaller signal to noise ratios (SNRs) compared to penetrating electrodes. Across all recorded units, the median SNR was 1.1 for non-penetrating electrodes and 1.6 for penetrating electrodes. Although the non-penetrating arrays were not anchored to the DRG or surrounding tissues, the spike amplitudes did not change (<1% change from baseline spike amplitude) when the limb was moved passively over a limited range of motion (~20 degrees at the hip). Units of various sensory fiber types were recorded, with 20% of units identified as primary muscle spindles, 37% as secondary muscle spindles, and 24% as cutaneous afferents. Our study suggests that non-penetrating electrode arrays can record modulated single- and multi-unit neural activity of various sensory fiber types from the DRG surface.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pittsburgh, United States of America (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000)
2 University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pittsburgh, United States of America (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000); University of Pittsburgh, Department of Bioengineering, Pittsburgh, United States of America (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000); Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States of America (GRID:grid.21925.3d)
3 University of Michigan, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ann Arbor, United States of America (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370); University of Michigan, Biointerfaces Institute, Ann Arbor, United States of America (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)