It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In 2016, several synthetic cathinones were seized by the State Bureau of Criminal Investigation Bavaria in Germany. Due to their previous appearances in other countries their metabolism was already investigated in human urine as well as different in vitro models. These investigations were conducted using ordinary metabolism studies for drugs of abuse by using general knowledge about drug metabolism and visual comparison of mass spectra. The present study aimed to use untargeted metabolomics to support and improve those methods that highly depend on the investigators experience. Incubations were conducted using pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM) and the two cathinones 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-butanone and 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-heptanone. Samples were analyzed by LC-HRMS/MS using a metabolomics workflow consisting of a reversed phase or normal phase separation followed by electrospray ionization and full scan in positive or negative mode. LC-MS data was afterwards statistically evaluated using principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding, and hierarchical clustering. Significant features were then identified using MS/MS. The workflow revealed 24 significant features after 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-butanone and 39 after 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-heptanone incubation, consisting of adducts, artifacts, isomers, and metabolites. The applied untargeted metabolomics strategy was able to find almost all of the metabolites that were previously described for 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-butanone in literature as well as three additional metabolites. Concerning 1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-heptanone biotransformation in pHLM, merely four metabolites described in primary human hepatocytes and human urine were not found. This study revealed that untargeted metabolomics workflows are well suited to support biotransformation studies at least of the investigated compounds in pHLM.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Keller, Andreas 2
; Schäper, Jan 3 ; Meyer, Markus R 1 1 Saarland University, Center for Molecular Signaling (PZMS), Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Homburg, Germany (GRID:grid.11749.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 7588)
2 Saarland University, Chair of Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarbruecken, Germany (GRID:grid.11749.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 7588)
3 State Bureau of Criminal Investigation Bavaria, München, Germany (GRID:grid.11749.3a)




