It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The present study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line (immediate) versus delayed use of combination dapagliflozin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes, from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system. We developed a Markov model to simulate the progress of subjects with type 2 diabetes. Decision analysis was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line combination dapagliflozin and metformin versus first-line metformin monotherapy followed by gradual addition of dapagliflozin over time. Transition probabilities, costs (in Australian dollars) and utility data were derived from published sources. All costs, years of life lived and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lived were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. Over a 20-year model period, first-line use of combination dapagliflozin and metformin was predicted to reduce the onset of hospitalisation of heart failure, cardiovascular deaths and all cause deaths by 5.5%, 57.6% and 29.6%, respectively. An additional 2.5 years of life (discounted) and 1.9 QALYs (discounted) would be gained per patient, at a cost of AUD $23,367 (discounted) per person. These figures equated to AUD $9,535 per years of life saved (YoLS) and AUD $12,477 per QALYs saved. Sensitivity analyses indicated the results to be robust. Compared to first-line metformin monotherapy followed by gradual addition of dapagliflozin, first-line use of combination dapagliflozin and metformin is likely to be a cost-effective approach to the management of Australians with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Monash University, CCRE Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
2 Monash University, CCRE Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)
3 Monash University, CCRE Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1051.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9760 5620)
4 Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1051.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9760 5620); Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)
5 Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.415508.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1964 6010)