It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The stiff compromise between reliability and conductivity of copper interconnects used in sub-nanometer nodes has brought into focus the choice of encapsulation material. While reliability was the primary driver so far, herein, we investigate how electronic conductivity of Cu(111) thin films is influenced by the encapsulation material using density functional theory and Boltzmann transport equation. Atomically thin 2D materials, namely conducting graphene and insulating graphane both retain the conductivity of Cu films whereas partially hydrogenated graphene (HGr) results in reduction of surface density of states and a reduction in Cu film conductivity. Among transition metal elements, we find that atoms in Co encapsulation layer, which essentially act as magnetic impurities, serve as electron scattering centres resulting in a decrease in conductivity by at least 15% for 11 nm thick Cu film. On the other hand, Mo, Ta, and Ru have more favorable effect on conductivity when compared to Co. The cause of decrease in conductivity for Co and HGr is discussed by investigating the electronic band structure and density of states. Our DFT calculations suggest that pristine graphene sheet is a good encapsulation material for advanced Cu interconnects both from chemical protection and conductivity point of view.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Samsung R&D Institute, Materials Simulation (SAIT-India), Bangalore, India (GRID:grid.465065.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1767 2380)
2 Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Inorganic Material Lab, Suwon, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.419666.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1945 5898)