There is an error in the caption for Fig 1. Please see the complete, correct Fig 1 caption here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Fig 1. Flowchart displaying the various criteria applied to the initial database to obtain the final number of hospital records available for the analysis.
SVD = spontaneous vaginal deliveries; IVD = instrumental vaginal deliveries; CS = cesarean sections.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.g001
There is an error in the caption for Fig 2. Please see the complete, correct Fig 2 caption here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Fig 2. Conceptual framework explaining the relationship between various determinants and length of hospital stay after childbirth (LoS).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.g002
There is an error in Table 2. Please see the complete, correct Table 2 here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Table 2. Distribution of length of stay (LoS) after childbirth by maternal health factors.
Number; mean LoS (M) ± standard deviation (SD); row percentage (row %). NA = Not applicable.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.t001
There are errors in Table 5. Please see the correct Table 5 here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Table 5. Multiple logistic regression analysis.
Outcome: length of hospital stay (LoS) longer than ED benchmarks (2 days for spontaneous vaginal deliveries; 3 days for instrumental vaginal deliveries). Effect estimates for hospital and calendar year adjusted for all other factors. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR*) and population attributable risks (PAR1$, PAR2,** PAR3,$ PAR4**) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). NA = Not available; observations = complete (case analysis) observations.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.t002
In the Results, there is an error in the second sentence of the penultimate paragraph. The correct sentence is: The proportional increase in LoS<ED for SVD would range from +23.1% (centre J) up to +64.5% (centre B), and would be +59.0%, +49.7%, +49.5%, +46.7%, +37.5%, +27.4% and +26.3% for centres D, I, K, E, C, F and H respectively (PAR1).
In the Generalizability subsection of the Discussion, there is an error in the first sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: The pooled mean LoS for SVD was 2.9 days in FVG during the whole study period (2005–2015), shorter than the average figures most recently reported for the whole of Italy (3.4 days).
There are errors in the Methods.
The title of the subsection “Child’s clinical factors fragility” is incorrect. The correct subsection title is: “Child’s clinical factors.”
In the Statistical analysis subsection, there is an error in the third item of the first list. The correct third item is: previous spontaneous abortions, as the relative effect size was not consistent across the two vaginal delivery modes.
In the Maternal health factors subsection, there is an error in the first sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: Table 2 displays the classes of clinical explanatory factors related with the maternal health domain: mother’s age, hypertension/diabetes, amniocentesis, villi sample, fetoscopy, pre-delivery LoS, presentation, labour induction, labour analgesia, neonatal status, number of obstetric checks performed, number of ultrasound (US) scans performed.
1. Cegolon L, Campbell O, Alberico S, Montico M, Mastrangelo G, Monasta L, et al. (2019) Length of stay following vaginal deliveries: A population based study in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0204919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204919 pmid:30605470
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019 Cegolon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
SVD = spontaneous vaginal deliveries; IVD = instrumental vaginal deliveries; CS = cesarean sections. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.g001 There is an error in the caption for Fig 2. Conceptual framework explaining the relationship between various determinants and length of hospital stay after childbirth (LoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213664.g002 There is an error in Table 2. Table 2 displays the classes of clinical explanatory factors related with the maternal health domain: mother’s age, hypertension/diabetes, amniocentesis, villi sample, fetoscopy, pre-delivery LoS, presentation, labour induction, labour analgesia, neonatal status, number of obstetric checks performed, number of ultrasound (US) scans performed. 1.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer