It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fundamental control of magnetic coupling through heterostructure morphology is a prerequisite for rational engineering of magnetic ground states. We report the tuning of magnetic interactions in superlattices composed of single and bilayers of SrIrO3 inter-spaced with SrTiO3 in analogy to the Ruddlesden-Popper series iridates. Magnetic scattering shows predominately c-axis antiferromagnetic orientation of the magnetic moments for the bilayer, as in Sr3Ir2O7. However, the magnetic excitation gap, measured by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, is quite different between the two structures, evidencing a significant change in the stability of the competing magnetic phases. In contrast, the single layer iridate hosts a more bulk-like gap. We find these changes are driven by bending of the c-axis Ir-O-Ir bond, which is much weaker in the single layer, and subsequent local environment changes, evidenced through x-ray diffraction and magnetic excitation modeling. Our findings demonstrate how large changes in the magnetic interactions can be tailored and probed in spin-orbit coupled heterostructures by engineering subtle structural modulations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, New York, USA (GRID:grid.202665.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 4229)
2 University of Tennessee, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Knoxville, USA (GRID:grid.411461.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2315 1184)
3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Physical Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419)
4 Argonne National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne, USA (GRID:grid.187073.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1939 4845)
5 Argonne National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne, USA (GRID:grid.187073.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1939 4845); Dublin City University, School of Physical Sciences, Dublin 9, Ireland (GRID:grid.15596.3e) (ISNI:0000000102380260)
6 Charles University, Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.4491.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 116X)
7 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.495569.2)