It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Two-dimensional perovskites have emerged as more intrinsically stable materials for solar cells. Chemical tuning of spacer organic cations has attracted great interest due to their additional functionalities. However, how the chemical nature of the organic cations affects the properties of two-dimensional perovskites and devices is rarely reported. Here we demonstrate that the selection of spacer cations (i.e., selective fluorination of phenethylammonium) affects the film properties of two-dimensional perovskites, leading to different device performance of two-dimensional perovskite solar cells (average n = 4). Structural analysis reveals that different packing arrangements and orientational disorder of the spacer cations result in orientational degeneracy and different formation energies, largely explaining the difference in film properties. This work provides key missing information on how spacer cations exert influence on desirable electronic properties and device performance of two-dimensional perovskites via the weak and cooperative interactions of these cations in the crystal lattice.
Two dimensional halide perovskites solar cells have attracted research interest due to their higher stability compared to three dimensional counterparts. Here Hu et al. show that fine tuning of the chemical structure of the spacer cations leads to different packing arrangements and device efficiency.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
2 Colorado State University, Department of Chemistry, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (GRID:grid.47894.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8083)
3 North Carolina State University, Department of Physics, Raleigh, USA (GRID:grid.40803.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 6074)
4 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Applied Physical Sciences, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)
5 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Chemistry, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Applied Physical Sciences, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.10698.36) (ISNI:0000000122483208)