It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a highly contagious and devastating viral disease affecting mainly sheep and goats, but also a large number of wild species within the order Artiodactyla. A better understanding of PPR transmission dynamics in multi-host systems is necessary to efficiently control the disease, in particular where wildlife and livestock co-occur. Notably, the role of wildlife in PPR epidemiology is still not clearly understood. Non-invasive strategies to detect PPR infection without the need for animal handling could greatly facilitate research on PPR epidemiology and management of the disease in atypical hosts and in complex field situations. Here, we describe optimized methods for the direct detection of PPR virus genetic material and antigen in fecal samples. We use these methods to determine the detection window of PPR in fecal samples, and compare the sensitivity of these methods to standard invasive sampling and PPR diagnostic methods using field samples collected at a wildlife-livestock interface in Africa. Our results show that quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-QPCR) amplification of PPRV from fecal swabs has good sensitivity in comparison to ocular swabs. Animals infected by PPRV could be identified relatively early on and during the whole course of infection based on fecal samples using RT-QPCR. Partial gene sequences could also be retrieved in some cases, from both fecal and ocular samples, providing important information about virus origin and relatedness to other PPRV strains. Non-invasive strategies for PPRV surveillance could provide important data to fill major gaps in our knowledge of the multi-host PPR epidemiology.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.8183.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2153 9871); ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141)
2 ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141)
3 The Pirbright Institute, Surrey, UK (GRID:grid.63622.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0388 7540)
4 ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141); CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, RP-PCP, Maputo, Mozambique (GRID:grid.121334.6); Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Faculdade de Veterinaria, Maputo, Mozambique (GRID:grid.8295.6)
5 Ngorongoro District Council, Arusha, Tanzania (GRID:grid.8295.6)
6 Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania (GRID:grid.452871.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2226 9754)
7 University of London, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK (GRID:grid.4464.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 2573)