It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective: To chart follow-up of patients after acute poisoning by substances of abuse, register whether patients referred to specialist health services attended, and whether patients contacted a general practitioner (GP) after the poisoning episode.
Design: Observational cohort study.
Setting: A primary care emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo, Norway.
Subjects: Patients ≥12 years treated for acute poisoning by substances of abuse were included consecutively from October 2011 to September 2012.
Main outcome measures: Follow-up initiated at discharge, proportion of cases in which referred patients attended within three months, and proportion of cases in which the patient consulted a GP the first month following discharge.
Results: There were 2343 episodes of acute poisoning by substances of abuse. In 391 (17%) cases the patient was hospitalised, including 49 (2%) in psychiatric wards. In 235 (10%) cases the patient was referred to specialist health services, in 91 (4%) advised to see their GP, in 82 (3%) to contact social services, in 74 (3%) allotted place in a homeless shelter, and in 93 (4%) other follow-up was initiated. In 1096 (47%) cases, the patient was discharged without follow-up, and in a further 324 (14%), the patient self-discharged. When referred to specialist health services, in 200/235 (85%) cases the patient attended within three months. Among all discharges, in 527/1952 (27%) cases the patient consulted a GP within one month. When advised to see their GP, in 45/91 (49%) cases the patient did.
Conclusion: Attendance was high for follow-up initiated after acute poisoning by substances of abuse.
- KEY POINTS
Despite poor long-term prognosis, patients treated for acute poisoning by substances of abuse are frequently not referred to follow-up.
Nearly all patients referred to specialist health services attended, indicating the acute poisoning as an opportune moment for intervention.
Advising patients to contact their GP was significantly associated with patients consulting the GP, but few patients were so advised.
One out of three patients was discharged without follow-up, and there seems to be an unused potential for GP involvement.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;; Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic, Department of Emergency General Practice, City of Oslo Health Agency, Oslo, Norway;
2 Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway;
3 Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway;; Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
4 Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;