It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to identify challenges to conducting research and obstacles to successful cervical cancer screening in public sector primary healthcare clinics (PHCs).
Design: Qualitative research was conducted, using semi-structured interviews.
Setting and subjects: Study staff and healthcare workers involved in the implementation of a large screening study conducted in existing primary healthcare facilities were interviewed during the study period.
Outcome measures: The outcome measure was qualitative data on problems and obstacles to research and cervical cancer screening in public health facilities.
Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed at intervals over three years. It was found that clinical research could only be conducted in PHC facilities if no additional burden was placed on the staff or facilities. Preventative care was not found to be part of the focus of the clinics, which rather concentrated on disease. The need for gynaecological examinations was identified as an important obstacle to screening at PHC clinics. Self-sampling was widely accepted, as was cervical sampling for human papillomavirus. Reporting of screening results to patients presented a huge challenge to PHC facilities. Ineffective communication of the results was identified as another major obstacle to effective screening.
Conclusion: Future cervical cancer screening methods should include sampling, without the need for an intimate examination. Finding new ways of calling women in for structured screening at regular intervals and reporting the results to them requires urgent attention.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Gynaecological Oncology Unit Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria