It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ensuring the persistence of biodiversity and ecosystem services represents a global challenge that need to be addressed with high urgency. Global priority areas can only be identified by means of an integrated prioritization approach that would not only preserve species numbers and ecosystem services, but also the evolutionary and functional components of diversity. In this study we combine global datasets on the distribution of mammals and birds with species traits and phylogenetic data and we identify conservation priorities for taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity, as well as for three ecosystem services, including potential for carbon sequestration, pollination potential and groundwater recharge. We show that, when priority areas are identified based only on individual, e.g. functional diversity, or any combination of the three biodiversity components, these areas do not allow a sufficient protection of the three ecosystem services. However, an integrated approach whereby prioritization is based on all biodiversity components and ecosystem services would allow to identify areas that maximize protection of all ecosystem services with a minimal loss in biodiversity coverage. Our results highlight the need for an integrated conservation planning framework in order to optimally allocate resources and achieve the long-term preservation of the multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystems services.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Aarhus University, Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
2 University of Helsinki, The Helsinki Lab of Ornithology, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071)
3 University of Turin, Department of Agronomy, Forestry and Food Sciences, Entomology and Zoology, Turin, Italy (GRID:grid.7605.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2336 6580)
4 Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece (GRID:grid.5216.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2155 0800)
5 Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy (GRID:grid.158820.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2611)
6 Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.439064.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0639 3060)
7 University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina, 26-13, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Torino, Italy (GRID:grid.7605.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2336 6580)
8 Aarhus University, Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722); Aarhus University, Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Bioscience, Aarhus C, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)