It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ustilago maydis is a biotrophic fungus causing corn smut disease in maize. The secreted effector protein Pit2 is an inhibitor of papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) essential for virulence. Pit2 inhibitory function relies on a conserved 14 amino acids motif (PID14). Here we show that synthetic PID14 peptides act more efficiently as PLCP inhibitors than the full-length Pit2 effector. Mass spectrometry shows processing of Pit2 by maize PLCPs, which releases an inhibitory core motif from the PID14 sequence. Mutational analysis demonstrates that two conserved residues are essential for Pit2 function. We propose that the Pit2 effector functions as a substrate mimicking molecule: Pit2 is a suitable substrate for apoplastic PLCPs and its processing releases the embedded inhibitor peptide, which in turn blocks PLCPs to modulate host immunity. Remarkably, the PID14 core motif is present in several plant associated fungi and bacteria, indicating the existence of a conserved microbial inhibitor of proteases (cMIP).
Pit2 is a secreted Ustilago maydis effector that contributes to corn smut disease by inhibiting papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) in maize. Here Misas Villamil et al. show that Pit2 mimics PLCP substrates, and is cleaved to release a peptide that blocks PLCP activity and represses host immunity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of Cologne, Botanical Institute and Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Cologne, Germany (GRID:grid.6190.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8580 3777)
2 Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany (GRID:grid.419554.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 8361)
3 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, ZEA-3, Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X)
4 The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK (GRID:grid.6190.e)
5 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, ZEA-3, Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X); University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany (GRID:grid.6190.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 8580 3777)