It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Conventional pollution monitoring strategies for heavy metals are often costly and unpractical. Innovative sampling and analytical approaches are therefore needed to efficiently monitor large areas. This study presents a novel, simple, fast, and inexpensive method to monitor heavy metal pollution that uses cation-exchange resin sachets and the micro-XRF core-scanning technique (XRF-CS). The resin passive samplers act as concentrators of cationic species and can be readily deployed spatially and temporally to record pollution signals. The large number of analytical tasks are then overcome by the fast and non-destructive XRF-CS to precisely assess elemental concentrations. Quantifying element loading involves direct comparison with a set of identically prepared and scanned resin reference standards containing Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb. The results show that within the test range (from 0–1000 s mg kg−1), the calibration lines have excellent regressions (R2 ≥ 0.97), even at the shortest exposure time (1 s). A pilot field survey of a suspected polluted area in central Taiwan, where 30 resin sachets had been deployed, identified a pollution hot spot in a rapid and economical manner. Therefore, this approach has the potential to become a valuable tool in environmental monitoring and forensics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 National Taiwan University, Department of Geosciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); National Taiwan University, Research Center of Future Earth, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); University of Innsbruck, Institute of Geology, Innsbruck, Austria (GRID:grid.5771.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8122)
2 National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Center for Teaching Excellence, Pingtung, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412083.c) (ISNI:0000 0000 9767 1257)
3 National Taiwan University, Department of Geosciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); National Taiwan University, Research Center of Future Earth, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
4 National Taiwan University, Department of Geosciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); University of Connecticut, Center of Integrative Geosciences, Storrs, USA (GRID:grid.63054.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0860 4915)
5 National Taiwan University, Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
6 University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, GAU-Radioanalytical, Southampton, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.19188.39)