It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Wild boar (Sus scrofa) drastically colonized mainland Eurasia and North Africa, most likely from East Asia during the Plio-Pleistocene (2–1Mya). In recent studies, based on genome-wide information, it was hypothesized that wild boar did not replace the species it encountered, but instead exchanged genetic materials with them through admixture. The highly endangered pygmy hog (Porcula salvania) is the only suid species in mainland Eurasia known to have outlived this expansion, and therefore provides a unique opportunity to test this hybridization hypothesis. Analyses of pygmy hog genomes indicate that despite large phylogenetic divergence (~2 My), wild boar and pygmy hog did indeed interbreed as the former expanded across Eurasia. In addition, we also assess the taxonomic placement of the donor of another introgression, pertaining to a now-extinct species with a deep phylogenetic placement in the Suidae tree. Altogether, our analyses indicate that the rapid spread of wild boar was facilitated by inter-specific/inter-generic admixtures.
The pygmy hog (Porcula salvania), now highly endangered and restricted in a small region at the southern foothills of the Himalaya, is the only suid species in mainland Eurasia that outlived the expansion of wild boar (Sus scrofa). Here, the authors analyze genomes of pygmy hog and related suid species, and identify signals of introgression among these species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Bosse Mirte 1
; Hendrik-Jan, Megens 1 ; Frantz Laurent A F 2 ; Young-Lim, Lee 1 ; Irving-Pease, Evan K 3
; Narayan Goutam 4
; Groenen Martien A M 1
; Madsen Ole 1 1 Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.4818.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0791 5666)
2 Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133); University of Oxford, Palaeogenomics and Bioarcheology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archeology and History of Art, Oxford, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
3 University of Oxford, Palaeogenomics and Bioarcheology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archeology and History of Art, Oxford, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
4 Les Augrès Manor, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Jersey, United Kingdom (GRID:grid.4991.5); Pygmy Hog Conservation Programme, EcoSystems-India, Guwahati, India (GRID:grid.4991.5)




