It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This cross-sectional study utilized the National School Health Survey 2015 database to assess the association between school cafeterias; the meals offered by the Brazilian School Food Program (PNAE); and the consumption of industrialized/ultra-processed salty foods, sweets, and soft drinks among Brazilian adolescents. A sample of 102,072 adolescents, aged 11–19 years, who were enrolled in the 9th grade completed the survey. The evaluated outcome was the consumption of industrialized/ultra-processed salty foods, sweets, and soft drinks. A Poisson regression model-based multivariate analysis was performed. The effect measure was the prevalence ratio (PR) with its respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results indicated that Brazilian adolescents who attended schools without meals offered through the PNAE had a higher probability of regularly (≥5 times/week) consuming ultra-processed salty foods [PR = 1.06, CI = 1.01–1.11] and soft drinks [PR = 1.08, CI = 1.03–1.14] compared to those who attended schools that offered PNAE meals. Moreover, the presence of a school cafeteria was associated with a higher probability to consume industrialized/ultra-processed salty foods [PR = 1.05, CI = 1.02–1.08], sweets [PR = 1.09, CI = 1.07–1.11], and soft drinks [PR = 1.10, CI = 1.07–1.13]. School meals appear to be associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods by Brazilian adolescents, indicating areas for health promotion programs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Universidade de São Paulo, Gynecology Discipline, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); Instituto Federal Goiano - Campus Ceres, Goiás, Brazil (GRID:grid.466845.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 4265)
2 Instituto Federal Goiano - Campus Ceres, Goiás, Brazil (GRID:grid.466845.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0370 4265)
3 Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC), São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.419034.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0413 8963)
4 Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Universidade de São Paulo, Gynecology Discipline, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)
5 Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculdade de Medicina, Goiás, Brazil (GRID:grid.411195.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 5801)