It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ribbon synapses transmit information in sensory systems, but their development is not well understood. To test the hypothesis that ribbon assembly stabilizes nascent synapses, we performed simultaneous time-lapse imaging of fluorescently-tagged ribbons in retinal cone bipolar cells (BCs) and postsynaptic densities (PSD95-FP) of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Ribbons and PSD95-FP clusters were more stable when these components colocalized at synapses. However, synapse density on ON-alpha RGCs was unchanged in mice lacking ribbons (ribeye knockout). Wildtype BCs make both ribbon-containing and ribbon-free synapses with these GCs even at maturity. Ribbon assembly and cone BC-RGC synapse maintenance are thus regulated independently. Despite the absence of synaptic ribbons, RGCs continued to respond robustly to light stimuli, although quantitative examination of the responses revealed reduced frequency and contrast sensitivity.
Ribbon synapses in our sensory nervous system are central to hearing and sight, yet little is known about how these synapses are assembled and maintained during development. In this study, authors use live imaging techniques to monitor ribbon appearance, loss and maintenance in a retinal circuit during development to show that nascent synapses comprising of both ribbons and PSD95 are more stable over time compared to contacts without ribbons.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Washington, Department of Biological Structure, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657)
2 Saarland University, Department of Neuroanatomy, Medical School Homburg/Saar, Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Homburg/Saar, Germany (GRID:grid.11749.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 7588)
3 University of Bonn, Institute of Anatomy, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2240 3300)
4 Oregon Health and Science University, Vollum institute, Portland, USA (GRID:grid.5288.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9758 5690)
5 Hyogo College of Medicine, Department of Biology, Nishinomiya, Japan (GRID:grid.272264.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9142 153X)
6 University of Sussex, School of Life Sciences, Brighton, UK (GRID:grid.12082.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7590)
7 University of Washington, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657)