Protective effects of urocortin 2 against caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis

Abstract

Because little is known about the role of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) agonists in regulating responses in pancreatitis, we evaluated the effects of urocortin 2 (UCN2) and stressin1 in caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) model in rats. Male rats were pretreated with UCN2 or stressin1 for 30 min followed by induction of AP with supraphysiologic doses of caerulein. Serum amylase and lipase activity, pancreatic tissue necrosis, immune cell infiltrate, nuclear factor (NF)-κB activity, trypsin levels, and intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) were ascertained. UCN2, but not stressin1 attenuated the severity of AP in rats. UCN2, but not stressin1, reduced serum amylase and lipase activity, cell necrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration in AP. NF-κB activity in pancreatic nuclear extracts increased in AP and UCN2 treatment reduced caerulein-induced increases in NF-κB activity by 42%. UCN2 treatment prevented caerulein-induced degradation of IκB-α in the cytosolic fraction as well as increased levels of p65 subunit of NF-κB in the cytosolic fraction. Pancreatic UCN2 levels decreased in AP compared with saline. UCN2 evoked [Ca2+]i responses in primary acinar cells and abolished caerulein-evoked [Ca2+]i responses at 0.1nM, and decreased by ~50% at 1.0nM caerulein. UCN2 stimulation resulted in redistribution of a portion of F-actin from the apical to the basolateral pole. UCN2 prevented the massive redistribution of F-actin observed with supraphysiologic doses of caerulein. UCN2, but not stressin1 attenuated severity of an experimental pancreatitis model. The protective effects of UCN2, including anti-inflammatory and anti-necrotic effects involve activation of the CRF2 receptor, [Ca2+]i signaling, and inhibition of NF-κB activity.

About the Authors:

Jingzhen Yuan

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America

Burcu Hasdemir

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations The Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America, Department of OB/GYN, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America

Tanya Tan

Roles Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America

Chintan Chheda

Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America

Jean Rivier

Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: The Salk Institute, The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, La Jolla, CA, United States of America

Stephen J. Pandol

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing

¶‡ These authors are co-senior authors on this work.

Affiliations Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America

Aditi Bhargava

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

¶‡ These authors are co-senior authors on this work.

Affiliations The Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America, Department of OB/GYN, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-0517

Introduction

The urocortins (UCN1-3) are members of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of neuropeptides [1]. CRF was originally isolated and characterized from the ovine hypothalamus [2] and is a potent stimulator of the secretion of ACTH and β-endorphins [3]. Urocortins are mammalian homologs of Urotensins that were initially discovered in the urophysis gland of the fish [4, 5]. UCNs along with CRF regulate the neuroendocrine responses to stress. UCNs play an important role in regulation of diverse processes such as vascular tone [6–8], cardiac function [9], visceral pain [10], immune cell activation, and gastrointestinal functions [11–16]. The urocortins exert their effects via two known receptors, CRF1 and CRF2 [17]. UCN1 binds with similar affinity to both receptors, whereas UCN2 and UCN3 bind exclusively to CRF2 [18]. Localization of these ligands and receptors has been ascertained in the central nervous system as well as in the peripheral tissues [11, 15, 19–22].

CRF-like immunoreactivity has been described in the endocrine pancreas of several classes of vertebrates that include fish, amphibians, birds, rodents, non-human primates, and humans [3]. In primates, CRF-containing endocrine cells are scattered within the pancreatic islets, whereas in rodents, they are located at the periphery of the islets. CRF-like immunoreactivity was also found to be interspersed between exocrine acinar cells in all species [3]. We have previously shown that CRF is secreted by cultured rat AR42J acinar cells and stimulation of AR42J cells with caerulein results in ~2-fold induction in CRF and de novo induction of UCN1 mRNA levels [21]. UCN3 is also present in the islets and thought to be a differentiation marker for β-cells [23]. Both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors are present in the human and rodent pancreatic islets [23] and CRF2 mRNA is reported in pancreatic acinar cells [21].

Caerulein-induced pancreatitis is one of the best-characterized experimental models that involves administration of high (supraphysiologic) doses of caerulein, a cholecystokinin analog. Physiologic doses used cause maximal pancreatic secretion of amylase and lipase [24, 25]. However, supraphysiologic concentrations result in inhibition of pancreatic secretion, elevation of serum enzymes, edema formation, and infiltration of inflammatory cells into the pancreas, and ultimately death of acinar cells [26–28].

In human acinar cells [29], and in rodents, exposure to secretagogues [21, 30], nutrients [31, 32] and radiocontrast [33] agents has been known to induce AP through mechanisms involving intracellular Ca2+ signaling, trypsinogen activation, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Particularly, NF-κB activation plays a key role in regulating the expression of genes involved in inflammation, cell injury, and cell death; and its role in caerulein-induced pancreatitis has been shown and characterized [34].

In male rats, UCN1, a ligand for both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors has been shown to increase pancreatic secretory volume and protein secretion as well as to potentiate cholecystokinin-stimulated protein secretion [35]. We have previously shown that UCN1 was induced de novo in exocrine pancreatic acinar cells in the murine model of caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis [21]. CRF2 receptor mRNA expression was also increased during AP, whereas CRF1 receptor mRNA expression was not detected in the acinar cells. UCN1 reduced histologic damage in male, but not female mice. UCN1 also decreased serum amylase levels and reduced ubiquitination of damaged proteins as well as other ER stress responses in a sex-specific manner [21]. However, the role of UCN2 in pancreatitis, the ligand that exclusively binds and activates CRF2 receptor, has not been characterized. Here, we report the immunomodulatory effects of UCN2 in pancreas of male rats. We used Stressin1, a synthetic CRF1 receptor-specific agonist, to determine the role of CRF1 in caerulein-induced model of acute pancreatitis.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Stressin1 and mouse (m)UCN2 were provided by Dr. Jean Rivier, The Salk Institute and The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. UCN2 was also purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and from American Peptides (Sunnyvale, CA). Caerulein was obtained Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA). NF-κB p65 Transcription factor assay kit was obtained from Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA). NF-κB, IκB-α, and GAPDH antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). Ionomycin was purchased from Molecular Probes (Fisher Scientific, CA) and Alexa Fluor 555 Phalloidin was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA).

Animals and animal care guidelines

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (120–150 g) were used in all experiments. The animals were kept in a temperature-(23 ± 2°C) and humidity- (55 ± 5%) controlled room with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The animals were provided ad libitum standard rat chow and tap water. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles and the University of California, San Francisco approved animal care and all procedures, in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Experimental pancreatitis model

Rats were pre-treated with intraperitoneal (IP) injection of CRF1 receptor-specific agonist, stressin1, or CRF2 receptor-specific agonist, UCN2, at doses of 10μg/kg body weight. Rats in control group were injected with saline (vehicle). After 30 min, the pre-treated rats received 4 IP injections of caerulein (CR, 20 μg/kg body weight) at 1-hour intervals. Control rats continued to receive saline injections. The rats were euthanized 1 hour after the 4th IP injection of caerulein or saline. Blood was collected in heparinized tubes for serum amylase and lipase determinations. The pancreata were removed, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, and a portion of the tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. A part of the tissue was fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde and paraffin-embedded for histopathological examination.

Preparation of nuclear extracts and NF-κB DNA binding activity measurement

Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from pancreatic tissue pre-treated saline or mUCN2 for 30 min followed by 1 IP injection of caerulein. Rats were euthanized 30 min later and pancreata were collected. Pancreatic nuclear extracts were prepared using the Active Motif Nuclear Extract Kit (Carlsbad, CA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. NF-κB DNA binding activities in the nuclear protein extracts were measured with ELISA method using Active Motif NF-κB p65 Transcription factor assay kit (Carlsbad, CA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

NF-κB and IκB western blotting

Western blot analysis on cytosolic fraction was performed for NF-κB and IκB-α levels as described previously [36]. Briefly, equal amounts of protein lysates were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.2 for 2 hours at room temperature followed by overnight incubated with specific primary antibodies NF-κB or IκB-α (1:1000) in Tris-buffered saline containing 3% nonfat dried milk at 4°C. After washes, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:5000) for 1h at room temperature. Blots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce). The bots were subsequently stripped and reprobed with GAPDH (1:1000), which was used as a loading control.

Enzymatic assays

Serum amylase and lipase levels were determined by using a Hitachi 707 analyzer (Antech Diagnostics, Irvine, CA). Active trypsin in pancreatic tissue was measured using Boc-Gln-Ala-Arg-AMC as a substrate by a fluorogenic assay as described previously [37, 38].

Histological measurements

Pancreatic tissue was fixed immediately in 10% buffered formaldehyde. Tissue was then embedded in paraffin and 5μm sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Sections were examined by light microscopy for assessment of parenchymal structure, inflammation, and acinar cell necrosis. Images were acquired using a light microscope (40X objective), and images were captured using all exposures manually set at equal times with a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope equipped with a digital camera using the SPOT imaging software (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI).

Quantification of necrosis was performed on H&E stained pancreatic sections. Images from multiple, non-overlapping sections were captured under a high-power field (x400-magnification, 6 to 10 random fields per section). Cells with swollen cytoplasm, loss of plasma membrane integrity, and leakage of organelles into interstitium were considered necrotic. A total of at least 2000 acinar cells were counted on tissue sections from each animal per condition (n = 3-5/group). Inflammatory cell infiltration was also quantified from H&E stained pancreatic sections from 3 rats per group and expressed as the number of inflammatory cells or vacuoles per 100 acinar cells.

ELISA for UCN2

Rat pancreatic acinar cells were prepared by injecting the pancreas with 1mL of 200 units/mL collagenase and digesting for 25 min at 37°C with agitation. Small clusters of cells were released by agitation and cells were washed 3x by centrifugation in extracellular Ca2+ buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.13 mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2, 10mM D-glucose, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), and 0.5% BSA. Cluster of acinar cells were treated as follows: a) untreated, b) 0.1nM caerulein (CR), c) 1.0nM CR, d) 100nM UCN2 for 30 minutes at 37°C, pre-treated for 30 min with 100nM UCN2 followed by 30 min treatment with e) 0.1nM CR, or f) 1.0nM CR. Cells were washed in 1x PBS. Protein lysates from primary acinar cells and pancreatic tissues (~150mg) were prepared by homogenizing cells/tissues in 1X PBS containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The lysate was spun at 10,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C and supernatant (cytoplasmic proteins) was collected and stored at -80KC until use. Total protein was assessed using the DC protein assay (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA). Two concentrations of total protein (30 and 60μg) were used in ELISA assay.

UCN2 ELISA was performed as per manufacturer’s specifications (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA). Briefly, 30 and 60μg of total protein in 100μL of standard dilution buffer were added into wells of the anti-UCN2 microplate, covered, and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. The liquid was discarded by flicking and incubated with 100μL of biotinylated UCN2 detector antibody for 60 minutes at 37°C. The plate was washed 3x with 300μL of 1x wash buffer for 1 minute each. Subsequently, 100μL of 1x Avidin-HRP conjugate was added to the wells and incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C followed by 5x washes. TMB substrate (90μL) was added to each well and the plate was incubated in the dark for approximately 12 minutes to develop the reaction. Stop solution (50μL) was added to each well to terminate the reaction. Standard range used was from 0-50ng/mL of UCN2. Absorbance was read at 450nm and wavelength correction was set to 570nm.

Phalloidin staining and confocal microscopy

Rat pancreatic acinar cells were prepared as described above. Cluster of acinar cells were treated as follows: a) untreated, b) 1.0nM caerulein (CR), c) 100nM UCN2 for 30 minutes at 37°C, pre-treated for 30 min with 100nM UCN2 followed by 30 min treatment with d) 1.0nM CR. Cells were washed with 1x PBS, embedded in OCT. Sections (20μm) were air dried, washed 3x with 1x PBS, blocked with 1x PBS containing 5% normal horse serum for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were stained with Alex Fluor 555 phalloidin (330nM) as per manufacturer’s specifications. Sections were observed with a Zeiss laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM Meta 510; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) using an x63 oil objective and images were captured at equal settings.

Intracellular Ca2+ [Ca2+]i measurement of primary acinar cells

Pancreas was obtained from adult C57/BL6 mouse and primary acinar cells were prepared by injecting the pancreas with 1mL of 200 units/mL collagenase and digesting for 25 min at 37°C with agitation. Small clusters of cells were released by agitation and cells were washed 3x by centrifugation in extracellular buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.13 mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2, 10mM D-glucose, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), and 0.5% BSA. Cells were loaded with Fura-2AM for 30 min at 37°C in buffer containing 1mM CaCl2. Cells were washed 3x and ~2,000 acini were seeded on poly D lysine-coated 96-well plates. Cells were sequentially stimulated with UCN2 (10nM or 100nM), caerulein (0.1nM or 1nM) in FlexStation 2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices) using dual wavelengths. Cells were finally stimulated with 1 μM ionomycin 90 seconds after last agonist stimulation, as indicated in the example Ca2+ traces to confirm cell viability (n = 6-8/condition). When Fura-2AM-loaded cells are excited at 340nm, emission value increases with increasing Ca2+ concentrations. In contrast, when loaded cells are excited at 380nm, Fura-2 signal decreases with increasing Ca2+ concentrations. The ratio of 340nm:380nm emissions is reflective of Ca2+ concentrations [39]. Agonist-induced peak Ca2+ responses were normalized to peak ionomycin-induced responses [40] to obtain changes in Ca2+ concentrations. Agonist stimulations included UCN2 at 10-100nM and caerulein at 0.1–1.0nM.

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to analyze data using Prism v8.02 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). A p value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM).

Results

UCN2 decreased serum amylase and lipase activity in caerulein-induced pancreatitis

Serum amylase and lipase activities were increased, as expected, following induction of AP with caerulein (Fig 1A and 1B). Pre-treatment of rats with the CRF2 receptor agonist, UCN2, significantly reduced caerulein-induced serum amylase and lipase activity by 43% and 48%, respectively. Unlike UCN2, pre-treatment with the CRF1 receptor agonist, stressin1, did not change caerulein-induced amylase and lipase activities (Fig 1A and 1B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Serum amylase and lipase activity.

UCN2 reduced serum (A) amylase activity by 43% and (B) lipase activity by 48% compared with caerulein treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. CR: caerulein. Amylase: ***: p<0.0001 vs. saline; #: p = 0.0038 saline vs. UCN2 + CR; *: p = 0.0145 Stressin1 +CR vs. UCN2 + CR. For Lipase: ***: p = 0.0001 vs. saline; #: p = 0.0107 saline vs. UCN2 + CR; *: p = 0.019 Stressin1 +CR vs. UCN2 + CR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g001

UCN2 decreased acinar cell necrosis

Histological analysis revealed that UCN2-treated pancreatic tissue was well preserved and considerably less necrotic than caerulein-treated tissue (Fig 2A). UCN2 treatment decreased the numbers of necrotic acinar cells by nearly 7-fold compared with caerulein and stressin1 treatments (Fig 2B). Stressin1 treatment had no effect on caerulein-induced cell necrosis (Fig 2B).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Histopathology and effect of UCN2 on cell necrosis.

(A) Representative micrographs showing H&E staining of pancreatic tissue sections. Necrotic cells are shown within yellow circles and arrows point to inflammatory cell infiltrates. Scale bar: 20μm. (B) Necrosis measurement: Necrosis was assessed on H&E stained pancreatic tissue sections using the following criteria- swollen cytoplasm, loss of plasma membrane integrity, and organelle leakage into interstitium. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3) for each condition. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. CR: caerulein. **: p = 0.0059 Saline vs. CR; #: p = 0.0030 Saline vs. Stressin1 +CR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g002

UCN2 decreased infiltrated inflammatory cell numbers

Infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells is seen during induction of acute pancreatitis. As expected, caerulein treatment markedly increased numbers of infiltrated immune cells in the pancreas, whereas UCN2 treatment decreased immune cell infiltration by nearly 7-fold (Fig 3). Stressin1 did not alter the numbers of immune cells (Fig 3). These results indicate that activation of the CRF2 receptors, but not the CRF1 receptors, attenuates pancreatic responses.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. UCN2 reduced neutrophil infiltration.

Number of inflammatory cell infiltration (neutrophils) was counted on H&E stained pancreatic tissue sections and expressed as percentage of total acinar cells. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3) for each condition. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. CR: caerulein. *: p = 0.0112 Saline vs. CR; **: p = 0.0012 Saline vs. Stressin1 +CR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g003

UCN2 levels decreased after acute pancreatitis induction

Since UCN2 administration had anti-inflammatory actions, we next ascertained if caerulein altered UCN2 levels in the pancreatic lysates as well primary acinar cells using ELISA. Compared with saline-treated rats, caerulein treatment decreased UCN2 in the pancreas. Pre-treatment with UCN2 resulted in further depression of endogenous UCN2 levels in the pancreas even in the face of caerulein treatment (Fig 4). In contrast, treatment of primary acinar cells with caerulein or UCN2, did not change UCN2 levels (Fig 4), suggesting that paracrine input is needed for this change to occur.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Loss of UCN2 expression in caerulein-induced pancreatitis.

UCN2 levels decreased in pancreatic lysates from UCN2 + caerulein-treated rats compared with saline-treated rats (p = 0.042), 1-way ANOVA, whereas UCN2 levels did not change in primary acinar cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g004

UCN2 inhibited activation of NF-κB

Translocation of NF-κB subunits from the cytoplasmic compartment to the nucleus results in transcriptional activation of a number of pro-inflammatory genes in pancreatic acini [34]. Next, we ascertained if UCN2 mediated its anti-inflammatory effect in AP via the NF-κB signaling pathway. As expected, caerulein treatment resulted in increased NF-κB activity in the nuclear fraction, whereas UCN2 treatment decreased NF-κB by nearly 42% (Fig 5A).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Effect of UCN2 on NF-κB and trypsin activity and IκB degradation.

Rats were pre-treated with saline or UCN2 for 30 min followed by treatment with caerulein for 1 hour. (A) NF-κB DNA binding activities were measured in the pancreatic nuclear extracts using ELISA. UCN2 treatment decreased NF-κB by nearly 42% in the nuclear extracts. (B) Western blot analysis showed decreased IκB-α and NF-κB levels in pancreatic tissue cytosolic extract after caerulein treatment compared with saline controls, suggesting either increased degradation IκB-α or increased translocation of NF-κB from the cytosol to the nucleus. UCN2 treatment prevented caerulein-induced changes in IκB-α degradation and NF-κB nuclear translocation. GAPDH, a housekeeping protein was used as a loading control (n = 3/condition). (C) Trypsin activity was increased after caerulein treatment and UCN2 treatment had a modest (15%) effect on trypsin activity. Values are means ± SEM (n = 5). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons. CR: caerulein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g005

UCN2 modulated trypsin activity

Trypsin activity and levels are increased in pancreatitis. As expected, caerulein treatment resulted in a ~6.6-fold increase in trypsin activity in pancreatic lysates, whereas pre-treatment with UCN2 resulted in ~5.6-fold increase in trypsin activity (Fig 5C). UCN2 treatment caused a modest (15%), but significant decrease in trypsin activity, thereby suggesting that UCN2-mediated mechanisms are largely independent of trypsinogen activation, at least in the acute phase.

UCN2 modulated intracellular Ca2+ [Ca2+]i levels in primary acinar cells

One mechanism by which caerulein mediates its detrimental effects on secretion are by increasing [Ca2+]i to levels that if remained unchecked can lead to organelle damage and cell death via mechanisms that involve mitochondrial depolarization. In primary acinar cells, UCN2 treatment evoked [Ca2+]i responses at concentrations of 10nM and 100nM (Fig 6A–6C). Interestingly, 100nM UCN2 prevented increases in [Ca2+]i at 0.1nM caerulein and reduced responses by 50% at 1.0nM caerulein, a dose that results in prolonged and sustained increases in [Ca2+]i and pancreatitis responses (Fig 6B and 6C). These results indicate that the actions of UCN2 and caerulein differ with respect to [Ca2+]i responses, although the reasons for these differences are not revealed here.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. UCN2 evokes Ca2+ transients in primary acinar cells.

Primary acinar cells were loaded with Fura2AM and stimulated with secretagogues as shown. (A) Peak [Ca2+]i increased in response to stimulations with 0.1nM caerulein (CR), 10nM, and 100nM UCN2. Ca2+ peaks were normalized to ionomycin responses. Stimulation with UCN2 showed dose-dependent increases in Ca2+ responses. Lower panel shows a cluster of Fura2AM-loaded acini. (B) Primary acinar cells were first stimulated with 10nM or 100nM of UCN2 followed by stimulation with 0.1nM or 1.0nM CR as shown. 100nM of UCN2 completely abrogated CR to induce Ca2+ peak responses at 0.1nM and reduced Ca2+ peak responses by 50% at 1.0nM, whereas 10nM UCN2 was not effective at modulating CR-induced Ca2+ responses. (C) Representative traces of Ca2+ peaks generated after stimulation with CR, UCN2, and ionomycin. N = 6-8/condition. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g006

UCN2 treatment prevented caerulein-induced redistribution of F-actin filaments

Supraphysiologic doses of caerulein are known to cause redistribution of F-actin from the apical to the basolateral pole [41]. We next stimulated primary rat acinar cells with caerulein or UCN2. In unstimulated acinar cells, F-actin was mostly apical in location (Fig 7A), whereas stimulation with supraphysiologic doses of caerulein (1.0nM) resulted in marked redistribution of F-actin from the apical to the basolateral membranes (Fig 7B, arrows). Our results here show that stimulation with 100nM UCN2 caused partial redistribution of F-actin from the apical to basolateral area of the cell (Fig 7C, arrows) and prevented the massive redistribution caused by caerulein (Fig 7D).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 7. UCN2 prevents F-actin redistribution and over secretion in the face of caerulein.

Pancreatic primary acinar cells were stained with Alexa Fluro 555 phalloidin to visualize F-actin bundles. (A) in unstimulated acini, F-actin was primarily seen at the apical poles. (B) stimulation with 1.0nM caerulein or (C) 100nM UCN2 for 30 minutes resulted in robust redistribution of F-actin from the apical to the basolateral pole, along with presence of secretory granules near the basolateral surface (arrows). (D) Pre-treatment with 100nM UCN2 followed by 1.0nM caerulein for 30 min restored apical F-actin expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065.g007

Discussion

Cellular stress responses are key for maintaining normal cellular function and homeostasis. Components of the CRF family of neuropeptide hormones that include UCNs have been shown to modulate immune function, cellular signaling [11–16] as well as secretion [21]. Here, we show that UCN2 ameliorated caerulein-induced pancreatitis measured by reductions in levels of serum amylase and lipase; and tissue measurements of cell necrosis, immune cell infiltration, as well as by inhibition of NF-κB activation. UCN2 treatment prevented caerulein-induced degradation IκB-α as well as nuclear translocation of NF-κB. Finally, UCN2 was found to be a secretagogue that evoked [Ca2+]i responses and well as redistributed F-actin in acinar cells.

UCN2 is potent vasodilator and one possible mechanism by which it could influence pancreatic function is by increasing blood flow to the organ, which is known to be compromised in pancreatitis [42]. UCN1, a closely related peptide and which interacts with both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors has also been shown to reduce serum amylase and inflammation in caerulein-induced pancreatitis model in mice [21]. Interestingly, stressin1, a CRF1 receptor agonist did not have effects on caerulein-induced pancreatitis suggesting that the protective effects of both UCN1 and UCN2 are likely mediated via CRF2 receptor. In contrast to UCN1 levels, which have been shown to increase in caerulein-induced pancreatitis [21], in this study, UCN2 levels decreased. Taken together, these data suggest that an interplay and balance between different UCNs is needed to fine tune inflammatory responses in pancreatitis.

Cytokines and chemokines play an important role in mediating inflammation. Translocation of the NF-κB from the cytoplasm to the nucleus results in activation of multiple pro-inflammatory genes and increases in circulating levels of cytokines in pancreatitis models [34]. Prevention of NF-κB translocation to the nucleus has a direct effect on TNF-α [43] and other cytokines levels [34]. We found that treatment with UCN2 decreased nuclear NF-κB activity, whereas stressin1 did not. Furthermore, while as expected, caerulein treatment resulted in degradation of cytosolic IκB-α as well decreased expression of NF-κB, UCN2 treatment prevented caerulein-induced degradation of IκB-α, as well as nuclear translocation of NF-κB. These data further suggests that UCN2 actions in the pancreas might be mediated by CRF2 receptor. In agreement with this notion, CRF2 receptor knockout mice have more exacerbated histological damage than wild-type controls [21].

Intra-pancreatic activation of trypsinogen is involved in pancreas injury and pancreatitis. Increased pancreatic trypsin levels are seen in animal models of pancreatitis [44]. While caerulein treatment increased trypsin activity in the pancreas in our studies, UCN2 treatment had a modest effect on trypsin activity, suggesting that UCN2-mediated mechanisms are only partly involved in trypsinogen pathways.

Secretion from the pancreatic acinar cells is tightly regulated by intracellular concentrations of Ca2+ as well as redistribution of F-actin. However, sustained increases in [Ca2+]i that are a predominant feature of caerulein-induced pancreatitis are detrimental, leading to organelle damage, inhibited secretion, and can ultimately result in cell death [45]. We found that UCN2 also evokes [Ca2+]i responses in primary acinar cells as well as redistributes F-actin from the apical to the basolateral surface. Interestingly, UCN2 treatment blocked caerulein-stimulated Ca2+ responses in cells treated with more physiologic concentrations of caerulein. At high doses of caerulein that cause pancreatitis like symptoms, UCN2 reduced caerulein-evoked [Ca2+]i by 50% and also prevented the massive redistribution of F-actin. While UCN2 is known to increase both cAMP and Ca2+ levels in other cell types [40], the mechanisms of these effects of UCN2 on [Ca2+]i and F-actin redistribution, both alone and with caerulein in acinar cells remain to be elucidated.

In conclusion, we show that UCN2 attenuated experimental pancreatitis; its protective effects including anti-inflammatory and anti-necrotic effects are potentially due the effect of UNC2 on activation of NF-κB pathway [46]. UCN2 also mediates its protective effects via F-actin redistribution and modulation of intracellular [Ca2+]i levels.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Drs. Sreenivasan Paruthiyil, Manisha Bhogale, and Ms. Hui Wang in the Bhargava laboratory for excellent technical help.

Citation: Yuan J, Hasdemir B, Tan T, Chheda C, Rivier J, Pandol SJ, et al. (2019) Protective effects of urocortin 2 against caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. PLoS ONE 14(5): e0217065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217065

References

1. Vaughan J, Donaldson C, Bittencourt J, Perrin MH, Lewis K, Sutton S, et al. Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin I and to corticotropin-releasing factor. Nature. 1995;378(6554):287–92. pmid:7477349.

2. Vale W, Spiess J, Rivier C, Rivier J. Characterization of a 41-residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates secretion of corticotropin and beta-endorphin. Science. 1981;213(4514):1394–7. pmid:6267699.

3. Petrusz P, Merchenthaler I, Maderdrut JL, Vigh S, Schally AV. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-like immunoreactivity in the vertebrate endocrine pancreas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80(6):1721–5. pmid:6340106; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC393675.

4. Maetz J, Bourguet J, Lahlouh B. [Urophysis and Osmoregulation in the Carassius Auratus]. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1964;4:401–14. pmid:14202679.

5. Pittman QJ, Hollenberg MD. Urotensin I-CRF-Urocortins: a mermaid's tail. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009;164(1):7–14. pmid:19409389; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3569504.

6. Cureton EL, Ereso AQ, Victorino GP, Curran B, Poole DP, Liao M, et al. Local secretion of urocortin 1 promotes microvascular permeability during lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. Endocrinology. 2009;150(12):5428–37. pmid:19819946; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2795720.

7. Smani T, Calderon E, Rodriguez-Moyano M, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Diaz I, Ordonez A. Urocortin-2 induces vasorelaxation of coronary arteries isolated from patients with heart failure. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;38(1):71–6. pmid:21105894.

8. Wiley KE, Davenport AP. CRF2 receptors are highly expressed in the human cardiovascular system and their cognate ligands urocortins 2 and 3 are potent vasodilators. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;143(4):508–14. pmid:15381637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1575420.

9. Tao J, Li S. Urocortin: a cardiac protective peptide? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;332(4):923–6. pmid:15949465.

10. Martinez V, Wang L, Million M, Rivier J, Tache Y. Urocortins and the regulation of gastrointestinal motor function and visceral pain. Peptides. 2004;25(10):1733–44. pmid:15476940.

11. Chang J, Adams MR, Clifton MS, Liao M, Brooks JH, Hasdemir B, et al. Urocortin 1 modulates immunosignaling in a rat model of colitis via corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2. AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2011;300(5):G884–94. pmid:21330446

12. Chatzaki E. Urocortin in Human Gastric Mucosa: Relationship to Inflammatory Activity. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003;88(1):478–83. pmid:12519893

13. Kokkotou E, Torres D, Moss AC, O'Brien M, Grigoriadis DE, Karalis K, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2-deficient mice have reduced intestinal inflammatory responses. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2006;177(5):3355–61.

14. Kubo Y, Kumano A, Kamei K, Amagase K, Abe N, Takeuchi K. Urocortin Prevents Indomethacin-Induced Small Intestinal Lesions in Rats Through Activation of CRF2 Receptors. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2009;55(6):1570–80. pmid:19707872

15. la Fleur SE, Wick EC, Idumalla PS, Grady EF, Bhargava A. Role of peripheral corticotropin-releasing factor and urocortin II in intestinal inflammation and motility in terminal ileum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(21):7647–52. pmid:15883387

16. Scarabelli TM, Pasini E, Stephanou A, Comini L, Curello S, Raddino R, et al. Urocortin promotes hemodynamic and bioenergetic recovery and improves cell survival in the isolated rat heart exposed to ischemia/reperfusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40(1):155–61. pmid:12103270

17. Perrin MH, Vale WW. Corticotropin releasing factor receptors and their ligand family. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;885:312–28. pmid:10816663.

18. Pal K, Swaminathan K, Xu HE, Pioszak AA. Structural basis for hormone recognition by the Human CRFR2{alpha} G protein-coupled receptor. The Journal of biological chemistry. 285(51):40351–61. pmid:20966082.

19. Chang J, Hoy JJ, Idumalla PS, Clifton MS, Pecoraro NC, Bhargava A. Urocortin 2 expression in the rat gastrointestinal tract under basal conditions and in chemical colitis. Peptides. 2007;28(7):1453–60. pmid:17586086; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3718314.

20. Deussing JM, Chen A. The Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Family: Physiology of the Stress Response. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(4):2225–86. pmid:30109816.

21. Kubat E, Mahajan S, Liao M, Ackerman L, Ohara PT, Grady EF, et al. Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2 mediates sex-specific cellular stress responses. Mol Med. 2013;19:212–22. Epub 2013/07/10. pmid:23835907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3745594.

22. Hasdemir B, Mhaske P, Paruthiyil S, Garnett EA, Heyman MB, Matloubian M, et al. Sex- and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2- dependent actions of urocortin 1 during inflammation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;310(11):R1244–57. pmid:27053649; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4935495.

23. van der Meulen T, Donaldson CJ, Caceres E, Hunter AE, Cowing-Zitron C, Pound LD, et al. Urocortin3 mediates somatostatin-dependent negative feedback control of insulin secretion. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):769–76. pmid:26076035; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4496282.

24. Jensen RT, Wank SA, Rowley WH, Sato S, Gardner JD. Interaction of CCK with pancreatic acinar cells. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1989;10(10):418–23. pmid:2694538.

25. Sato S, Stark HA, Martinez J, Beaven MA, Jensen RT, Gardner JD. Receptor occupation, calcium mobilization, and amylase release in pancreatic acini: effect of CCK-JMV-180. Am J Physiol. 1989;257(2 Pt 1):G202–9. pmid:2475030.

26. Lerch MM, Adler G. Experimental animal models of acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol. 1994;15(3):159–70. pmid:7930776.

27. Lerch MM, Gorelick FS. Models of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1180–93. pmid:23622127.

28. Saluja AK, Saluja M, Printz H, Zavertnik A, Sengupta A, Steer ML. Experimental pancreatitis is mediated by low-affinity cholecystokinin receptors that inhibit digestive enzyme secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(22):8968–71. pmid:2479032; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC298412.

29. Lugea A, Waldron RT, Mareninova OA, Shalbueva N, Deng N, Su HY, et al. Human Pancreatic Acinar Cells: Proteomic Characterization, Physiologic Responses, and Organellar Disorders in ex Vivo Pancreatitis. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(12):2726–43. pmid:28935577; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5718097.

30. Gorelick FS, Lerch MM. Do Animal Models of Acute Pancreatitis Reproduce Human Disease? Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;4(2):251–62. pmid:28752114; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5518169.

31. Kubisch CH, Logsdon CD. Secretagogues differentially activate endoplasmic reticulum stress responses in pancreatic acinar cells. AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2007;292(6):G1804–G12. pmid:17431218

32. Saluja AK, Bhagat L, Lee HS, Bhatia M, Frossard JL, Steer ML. Secretagogue-induced digestive enzyme activation and cell injury in rat pancreatic acini. The American journal of physiology. 1999;276(4 Pt 1):G835–42. pmid:10198325

33. Jin S, Orabi AI, Le T, Javed TA, Sah S, Eisses JF, et al. Exposure to Radiocontrast Agents Induces Pancreatic Inflammation by Activation of Nuclear Factor-kappaB, Calcium Signaling, and Calcineurin. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):753–64 e11. pmid:25980752; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4550538.

34. Gukovsky I, Gukovskaya AS, Blinman TA, Zaninovic V, Pandol SJ. Early NF-kappaB activation is associated with hormone-induced pancreatitis. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(6 Pt 1):G1402–14. pmid:9843778.

35. Guzman EA, Zhang W, Lin TR, Mulholland MW. Stimulation of rat pancreatic exocrine secretion by urocortin and corticotropin releasing factor. Peptides. 2003;24(5):727–34. pmid:12895659.

36. Satoh A, Gukovskaya AS, Nieto JM, Cheng JH, Gukovsky I, Reeve JR Jr., et al. PKC-delta and -epsilon regulate NF-kappaB activation induced by cholecystokinin and TNF-alpha in pancreatic acinar cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287(3):G582–91. pmid:15117677.

37. Liu Y, Yuan J, Tan T, Jia W, Lugea A, Mareninova O, et al. Genetic inhibition of protein kinase Cepsilon attenuates necrosis in experimental pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;307(5):G550–63. pmid:25035113; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4154116.

38. Lugea A, Gong J, Nguyen J, Nieto J, French SW, Pandol SJ. Cholinergic mediation of alcohol-induced experimental pancreatitis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(10):1768–81. pmid:20626730; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2950903.

39. Marshall IC, Boyfield I, McNulty S. Ratiometric Ca(2)(+) measurements using the FlexStation((R))Scanning Fluorometer. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;937:95–101. pmid:23007580.

40. Hasdemir B, Mahajan S, Oses-Prieto J, Chand S, Woolley M, Burlingame A, et al. Actin cytoskeleton-dependent regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor heteromers. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(18):2386–99. pmid:28701349; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5576902.

41. O'Konski MS, Pandol SJ. Effects of caerulein on the apical cytoskeleton of the pancreatic acinar cell. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(5):1649–57. pmid:1700797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC296915.

42. Bassi D, Kollias N, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Foitzik T, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Impairment of pancreatic microcirculation correlates with the severity of acute experimental pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179(3):257–63. pmid:8069418.

43. Bhargava A, Clifton MS, Mhaske P, Liao M, Pothoulakis C, Leeman SE, et al. Local injection of dsRNA targeting calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) ameliorates Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced ileitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(2):731–6. pmid:23267070; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3545755.

44. Graf R, Schiesser M, Bimmler D. Increased secretion of the pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (PSTI-I, monitor peptide) during development of chronic pancreatitis in the WBN/Kob rat. Pancreatology. 2002;2(2):108–15. pmid:12123090.

45. Voronina S, Collier D, Chvanov M, Middlehurst B, Beckett AJ, Prior IA, et al. The role of Ca2+ influx in endocytic vacuole formation in pancreatic acinar cells. Biochem J. 2015;465(3):405–12. pmid:25370603; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4303308.

46. Gukovskaya AS, Vaquero E, Zaninovic V, Gorelick FS, Lusis AJ, Brennan ML, et al. Neutrophils and NADPH oxidase mediate intrapancreatic trypsin activation in murine experimental acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(4):974–84. pmid:11910350.