It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms provide ways to use noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers for practical applications. Expanding the portfolio of such techniques, we propose a quantum circuit learning algorithm that can be used to assist the characterization of quantum devices and to train shallow circuits for generative tasks. The procedure leverages quantum hardware capabilities to its fullest extent by using native gates and their qubit connectivity. We demonstrate that our approach can learn an optimal preparation of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, also known as “cat states”. We further demonstrate that our approach can efficiently prepare approximate representations of coherent thermal states, wave functions that encode Boltzmann probabilities in their amplitudes. Finally, complementing proposals to characterize the power or usefulness of near-term quantum devices, such as IBM’s quantum volume, we provide a new hardware-independent metric called the qBAS score. It is based on the performance yield in a specific sampling task on one of the canonical machine learning data sets known as Bars and Stripes. We show how entanglement is a key ingredient in encoding the patterns of this data set; an ideal benchmark for testing hardware starting at four qubits and up. We provide experimental results and evaluation of this metric to probe the trade off between several architectural circuit designs and circuit depths on an ion-trap quantum computer.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b)
2 Qubitera, LLC., Mountain View, USA (GRID:grid.83440.3b)
3 Qubitera, LLC., Mountain View, USA (GRID:grid.83440.3b); Rigetti Computing, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.486186.5); Central Connecticut State University, Department of Mathematics, New Britain, USA (GRID:grid.247980.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 3689)
4 Qubitera, LLC., Mountain View, USA (GRID:grid.247980.0); Rigetti Computing, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.486186.5)
5 IonQ, Inc., College Park, USA (GRID:grid.486186.5)
6 University College London, Department of Computer Science, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Qubitera, LLC., Mountain View, USA (GRID:grid.83440.3b); Rigetti Computing, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.486186.5); Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab., NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, USA (GRID:grid.419075.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1955 7990); Zapata Computing Inc., 439 University Avenue, Office 535, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.419075.e)