It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
The role of resistant starch (RS) in glucose, insulin, insulin resistance or sensitivity, and lipid parameters have been reported in several studies and remained controversial. A pooled analysis which assessed these parameters has not been performed. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to sum up existing evidence about the issue.
Methods
We searched in MEDLINE and PUBMED for studies that were published before November 2018. Meta-analysis of diabetics and nondiabetics trials were performed by use of a random-effects model.
Results
A total of 13 case–control studies that included 428 subjects with body mass index ≥25 were identified. RS supplementation reduced fasting insulin in overall and stratified (diabetics and nondiabetics trials) analysis (SMD = –0.72; 95% CI: –1.13 to –0.31; SMD = –1.26; 95% CI: –1.66 to –0.86 and SMD = –0.64; 95% CI: –1.10 to –0.18, respectively), and reduced fasting glucose in overall and stratified analysis for diabetic trials (SMD = –0.26; 95% CI: –0.5 to –0.02 and SMD = –0.28; 95% CI: –0.54 to –0.01, respectively). RS supplementation increased HOMA-S% (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.59–1.78) and reduced HOMA-B (SMD =–1.2; 95% CI: –1.64 to –0.77), LDL-c concentration (SMD =–0.35; 95% CI: –0.61 to −0.09), and HbA1c (SMD = –0.43; 95% CI: –0.74 to –0.13) in overall analysis.
Conclusions
This meta-analysis has provided evidence that RS supplementation can improve fasting glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance and sensitivity, especially for diabetic with overweight or obesity. However, owing to potential sophistication, individual difference and composition of intestinal microbiota, this result should be carefully taken into account.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.412901.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1770 1022)
2 Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Healthcare-associated Infection Control Center, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.410646.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1808 0950)
3 West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Department of day surgery centre, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.412901.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1770 1022)
4 West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.412901.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1770 1022)