Transfer Printing and its Applications in Flexible Electronic Devices

Abstract

Flexible electronic systems have received increasing attention in the past few decades because of their wide-ranging applications that include the flexible display, eyelike digital camera, skin electronics, and intelligent surgical gloves, among many other health monitoring devices. As one of the most widely used technologies to integrate rigid functional devices with elastomeric substrates for the manufacturing of flexible electronic devices, transfer printing technology has been extensively studied. Though primarily relying on reversible interfacial adhesion, a variety of advanced transfer printing methods have been proposed and demonstrated. In this review, we first summarize the characteristics of a few representative methods of transfer printing. Next, we will introduce successful demonstrations of each method in flexible electronic devices. Moreover, the potential challenges and future development opportunities for transfer printing will then be briefly discussed.

1. Introduction

The increasing popularity of intelligent terminals has driven the rapid development of bio-integrated and implantable electronic devices. These classes of emerging high-performance electronics are lightweight, flexible, and highly sensitive, which opens application opportunities in skin-like electronics, wearable health monitoring devices, and human-machine interfaces. A few representative examples used in biomedical diagnostics include flexible digital x-ray detectors, medical balloon catheters, bio-integrated neural electrode arrays, and soft surgical gloves. Because of the intrinsically flexible and stretchable properties, low-cost fabrication processes, and compatibility with the solution process, the use of organic materials for flexible and stretchable electronics is straightforward [1,2,3,4,5]. However, compromised electrical properties limit their use in certain applications where high performance is desirable [5,6,7]. As an alternative to intrinsically stretchable organic materials, inorganic semiconducting and conducting materials designed in a stretchable layout exhibit outstanding electrical properties, such as high conductivity and charge carrier mobility, yielding devices with performances comparable to those fabricated with conventional wafer-based technologies [6,7,8].

As the high-performance of a device hinges on its fabrication process, it is highly desirable to fabricate stretchable inorganic devices on the conventional substrate with the photolithographic or other similar processes [9,10,11]. To provide a robust handling substrate, and also an interface to the soft tissues, the fabricated inorganic devices would need to be integrated onto the flexible and stretchable substrates [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The process to transfer the devices fabricated from the growth (donor) substrate to the receiving substrate can be achieved via a stamp by a technique termed as transfer printing [19,20,21,22,23,24].

As one of the most widely used methods for the fabrication of flexible and stretchable inorganic photonic/electronic devices, transfer printing [22,25,26,27,28,29] provides a versatile route to deterministically assemble micro- and nano-materials into spatially organized, functional arrangements with two- and three-dimensional layouts [30,31,32]. The transfer printing method is also suitable for large-scale assembly [7,19,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The typical transfer printing process consists of two steps: Pickup and printing (Figure 1). In the pickup step, functional device components (e.g., micro-/nano-membranes, ribbons, nanowires, nanotube, etc.) pre-fabricated on the donor substrate are first picked up onto a stamp. In the printing step, the inked stamp is then brought into contact with the receiver, followed by the removal of the stamp to print the device components onto the receiving substrate (receiver). The stamp used in both the pickup and printing steps is clearly the key to the successful implementation of the transfer printing process with a high fidelity and easy control [25,40,41].

The transfer printing process involves the competing fracture at the stamp/device interface and the device/substrate (donor or receiver) interface. The fracture at the stamp/device interface occurs in the printing step, whereas the fracture at the device/donor interface occurs in the pickup step [24,25,42]. The successful pickup requires the adhesion strength at the stamp/device interface to be larger than that at the device/donor interface, resulting in delamination at the device/donor interface to transfer the functional devices onto the elastomeric stamp (Figure 2a). Conversely, the adhesion strength at the device/receiver interface is stronger than that at the stamp/device interface in the printing step. Consequently, peeling off the stamp prints the functional devices onto the receiver (Figure 2b).

As the successful transfer printing process hinges on the modulation of the interfacial adhesion at different material/structural interfaces [40], efforts have been dedicated to the exploration of feasible methods for the modulation of interfacial adhesion strength. Among the various techniques being developed, the straightforward ones include kinetic adhesion control [24,25,43,44], modification of the surface chemistry [45,46], and solvent-assisted adhesion control [47,48]. Though effective, these methods typically involve the use of the solvent or etchant to remove sacrificial layers, which would cause irreversible damage to the various functional components in the device system and compromise the device performance. As a result, the techniques that are based on mechanical principles for reversible adhesion modulation have started to gain momentum.

Transfer printing technology is associated with several salient advantages: (1) The device components fabricated with the conventional wafer-based technologies enable high performance of the electronic systems; (2) the deterministic assembly is efficient, with high precision; (3) the transfer printing process is repeatable even at large-scale integration, such as the roll-to-roll application for both 2D and 3D layouts [49]; (4) certain transfer printing techniques can be operated at room temperature with low cost; and (5) it is applicable to a wide range of structures and materials, ranging from the assembly of micro-/nano-structures in various shapes and sizes to materials that include organic molecular materials [50,51]; inorganic semiconducting materials, such as GaAs/GaN/etc. [52]; functional polymers [53]; metals; piezoelectric materials; and many others.

Given the existing reviews on the technique of transfer printing that mainly focus on the mechanics, materials, and applications [30,54,55,56], this review will summarize the recent developments of transfer printing techniques in Section 2 and their applications in the fabrication process for various flexible and stretchable electronic devices in Section 3. The challenges and future directions of transfer printing will then be discussed in Section 4.

2. Transfer Printing Methods

To explore the full potential of different transfer printing techniques, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of different techniques, as well as the advantages and limitations of each transfer printing method.

2.1. Kinetically Controlled Transfer Printing

Based on the kinetically dependent nature of the viscoelastic stamp [24,25,44], the adhesion strength between the stamp and the functional devices can be modulated by the retraction speed of the stamp. Without using the adhesive layer, van der Waals forces are sufficient in this mode of operation. While the substrate and functional device components (modeled as thin films) are elastic, the critical energy release rate at the film/substrate interface,_{Gcritfilm/substrate}, remains unchanged during the transfer printing process. However, with the use of the viscoelastic stamp, the critical energy release rate at the stamp/film interface,_{Gcritstamp/film} , is rate-sensitive and depends on the peeling velocity. A viscoelastic model, validated by the numerical and experimental results, describes this rate-dependent behavior and the result shows that the pull-off force increases with the peeling velocity [57]. The critical energy release rate,_{Gcritstamp/film} , that monotonically increases with the peeling velocity, v, (Figure 3) can be expressed as:

_{Gcritstamp/film}(v)=_G0[1+^(v_v0)n]

where_G0is the critical energy release rate when the peeling velocity approaches zero,_v0is the reference peeling velocity at which the critical energy release rate equals to2_G0, and the exponent, n, is a scaling parameter that can be obtained by the experiment.

By adjusting the peeling velocity applied on the viscoelastic stamp, the adhesion at the device/stamp interface can be easily modulated to yield controlled delamination: A sufficiently high velocity for pickup (Figure 2a) and then a slow retraction for printing (Figure 2b). Though this kinetically controlled transfer printing technique provides a pragmatic, easy-to-operate tactic to assemble functional devices onto various flexible substrates, the range of modulation is limited due to the restriction of the peeling speed. Moreover, this method is not applicable when the receiver is also viscoelastic, limiting its application to certain classes of materials as the receiver.

2.2. Thermal Release Transfer Printing

As one of the most widely used methods, transfer printing based on the use of a thin and flexible thermal release tape (TRT) is simple to operate and a fracture mechanics model is used in the analysis [58]. The technique relies on the large and irreversible reduction in the adhesion strength when the TRT is heated over the transition temperature (i.e., 100 °C) (Figure 4). The quantitative dependence of the energy release rate at the functional membrane/TRT interface is characterized by Equation (2), which is a function of the temperature and peeling velocity. With the additional control in the temperature, the ratio of strong to weak adhesion becomes larger when compared to the technique that only uses the kinetic control:

_{GTRT/membrane}(v,T)={[−^{eγ(T−_Tr)+ln(_G0−_Gr)}+_G0][1+^(v_v0)n]T≤_TrG0[1+^(v_v0)n]T>_Tr

whereTis the temperature,eis the Euler’s constant,_Gris the critical energy release rate when the adhesives on TRT are deactivated,_Tris the transition temperature,γis a material parameter, and the other parameters are the same as in Equation (1).

The modulation of the critical energy release rate at the TRT/membrane interface is mainly controlled by the peeling velocity and temperature as described in Equation (2). The critical energy release rate,_{GTRT/membrane} , remains almost unchanged for temperatures below 70 °C (Figure 4b), which is much larger than the critical energy release rate at the membrane/donor interface,_{Gmembrane/donorsubstrate}. Because the crack propagation occurs at the device/substrate interface, the membrane devices could be easily picked up. When the TRT/membrane system is heated above 80 °C, the critical energy release rate,_{GTRT/membrane}, significantly decreases to be smaller than the critical energy release rate at the membrane/receiver interface,_{Gmembrane/receiversubstrate}. Upon peeling off the TRT, the crack propagates at the TRT/membrane interface, which facilitates the printing of the membrane devices onto the receiver substrate. As the critical energy release rate,_{GTRT/membrane} , can be modulated with the peeling velocity and temperature over a large range (Figure 4d,e), the thermal release transfer printing represents a powerful method in the device integration.

2.3. Water-Assisted Transfer Printing

With the use of a thin Ni layer between the device and the donor (e.g., Si wafer coated with SiO₂), the water-assisted transfer printing method (WTP) is developed to integrate electronic devices, such as those based on nanowires (NW) on different substrates (Figure 5) [59,60,61]. Peeling-off in a water bath at room temperature transfers the device and the Ni layer onto the thermal release tape. Following the Ni etching and a printing step delivers the device to different non-conventional substrates without defects.

The successful operation of WTP clearly depends on the water-assisted interfacial fracture at the Ni/SiO₂ interface. Deposition of the Ni layer on the Si wafer coated with SiO₂ forms nickel silicate or nickel oxide, which results in Ni hydroxide when it is immersed in the water. As both the SiO₂ and Ni hydroxide are hydrophilic, water can quickly penetrate at the interface to result in interface separation. Because the lift-off is operated at room temperature, the possible damage from high temperatures can be avoided. The detailed working principle of the interfacial debonding process is studied through theory, experiment, and finite element analysis [62].

In a different approach, a water-mediated transfer printing method is developed to print Al thin films on a substrate as shown in Figure 6a [63] and Figure 6b [64]. Although there are some slight differences between the two transfer printing processes, their working principle is the same. That is, the self-assembled monolayers (SAM) layer weakens the adhesion strength between the Al thin film and the stamp/glass inkpad in the pickup step and enables the facile and complete release of the Al thin film. The water layer on the substrate, as the most critical part, serves as an adhesion layer, promoting the adhesive bonding between the Al thin film and the target substrate. For example, as shown in Figure 6b, spontaneously formed on the donor glass substrate, a thin organic self-assembled monolayer (SAM), such as octadecylsiloxane, facilitates the release of Al onto the PDMS stamp in the pickup step. In the printing step, the water layer pre-formed on the receiver surface promotes the interface adhesion at the Al/receiver interface.

2.4. Surface Relief Structure-Assisted Transfer Printing

The interfacial adhesion strength dominated by van der Waals interaction is directly related to the contact area at the interface. Leveraging the idea of structural collapse [65,66], a surface relief structure-assisted transfer printing method was developed to mimic the reversible dry adhesion at the gecko’s foot [67]. Instead of using stamps with a flat surface, the soft stamp is designed with pyramidal microtips on its surface (Figure 7). In the pickup step, the applied pressure collapses the pyramidal microtips to increase the contact area, thereby enhancing the adhesion at the stamp/device interface for pickup. After placing the inked stamp onto the receiver, the removal of the pressure leads to the recovery of the pyramidal microtips for a significantly reduced contact area, minimizing the adhesion strength at the stamp/device interface for printing (Figure 7e). It should be noted that it is also possible to combine the principle of kinetically dependent adhesion by a rapid peeling in the pickup (Figure 7c) and/or a slow retraction in the printing (Figure 7f) to further increase the range of modulation in the interfacial adhesion strength.

As it is desirable to have a reversible adhesion, it is critical to design the geometry of the microtips, such as its height. Two- and three-dimensional mechanics models are established [68] to determine the range of heights. The expressions of the minimum and maximum heights of the microtips are deduced in the two- and three-dimensional models to investigate the influence of the height of the microtips on the reversible adhesion strength. Verified by the experiments, the analytical study provides useful guidelines in the design of surface structures.

Similar to the idea of changing the contact area at the stamp/device interface, a variety of viscoelastic stamps with different surface relief structures have been designed, including patterned pillars [69], grating-like reliefs [70,71], angled micro-flaps [72], and many others (Figure 8).

2.5. Shear-Assisted Transfer Printing

With the same inspiration from the gecko’s foot, the directionally dependent dry adhesion has also been applied to transfer printing, resulting in the shear-assisted technique [73,74]. The analytical model [75], validated by the experiment, indicates that a shear displacement on the stamp greatly reduces the critical energy release rate at the device/stamp interface, which helps the separation at the interface. The pull-off force needed for delamination at the device/stamp interface decreases almost linearly with the increasing shear strain. In view of this, the shear displacement is applied in the printing step (Figure 9).

2.6. Transfer Printing Based on Shape Memory Polymer

Capable of switching between temporary and permanent shapes, shape memory polymer (SMP) provides an alternative material to the conventional PDMS stamps in transfer printing. SMP can memorize the temporary shape formed by various pre-loads and easily recover its permanent shape after being triggered by an external stimulus (e.g., heat, electricity, light, moisture, etc.) [76,77,78,79]. In a representative use, the SMP stamp with a permanent shape of the relief structure, such as the example discussed in Figure 7, can be programmed to have a temporary shape of the collapsed state (Figure 10) [80,81]. The temporary shape with a large contact area and high interfacial adhesion strength is used in the pickup step. Upon heating, the SMP stamp recovers to its permanent shape with a significantly reduced contact area and low interfacial adhesion strength, which is then used for printing. Such temperature controlled transfer printing with the use of the SMP stamp is studied by an analytical model and the results provide optimized surface relief structures [82]. Though effective and easy to operate, the use of the SMP stamp may involve high temperatures, resulting in damage to delicate functional micro-devices and substrates. Moreover, it is not easy to apply in industrial-scale manufacturing.

2.7. Laser-Assisted Transfer Printing

Building on the idea of the thermal mismatch from the thermo-mechanical response of multilayered structures with different materials, a laser pulse is introduced in the printing step to initiate the separation of the device components from the stamp, where the device component does not need to be in contact with the receiver (Figure 11) [83,84]. The success of the non-contact laser-assisted transfer printing method closely depends on the laser pulse used in the printing step.

By avoiding direct contact between the functional device components and the target substrate, laser-assisted transfer printing expands the range of the receiving substrate (with different geometrical and material properties) in the integration process. To analyze the mechanism of delamination induced by the laser pulse, analytical mechanics models, validated by experiments and the finite element analysis, are also established to relate the energy release rate with the temperature distribution resulting from the laser pulse [33,85,86,87] and the influence of the device size on the temperature distribution is specifically analyzed [88]. Though it offers the versatility to print functional device components onto various flat, curved, or even partially defected substrate surfaces, laser-assisted transfer printing would require a relatively precise control of the intensity and irradiation time of the laser pulse, which is typically associated with expensive equipment.

2.8. Intaglio Transfer Printing Method

Choi et al. [89] developed an intaglio transfer printing method for creating quantum dot (QD) arrays, which is slightly different from conventional methods. This method enabled the nanocrystal layers to be transfer-printed on various substrates without consideration of the size and shape. The whole transfer printing process is shown in Figure 12, in which the QD layer is firstly pre-fabricated on a Si source substrate. The flat PDMS stamp is in good contact with the QD layer to pick it up quickly. Then, the inked stamp is moved to contact on the intaglio trenches carved on the Si substrate (it is the special feature of this method) and is pressed with low pressure. In the third step, peeling off the stamp slowly makes the intaglio QD patterns form on the PDMS stamp rather than on the Si substrate, and the rest of the QD layer is released on the Si substrate. Finally, the inked stamp is transferred to print the QD layer onto the target substrate. Ultimate QD arrays can be completed through repetitive aligned transfer printing. It is worth mentioning that the current method can be generalized to transfer various QD layers regardless of the QD materials. Furthermore, the intaglio trenches are reusable because the residual QD layers on the trench can be eliminated easily through either mechanical rubbing or cleaning in a piranha solution.

2.9. Magnetic-Assisted Transfer Printing

As an alternative approach to trigger the transfer printing by an external field, magnetic-assisted transfer printing was developed with the use of a magnetic-responsive film [90,91] or magnetic particles [92] to deform the elastic film. The former exploits a structurally designed stamp with an incompressible liquid chamber stacked on top of a gas chamber. The liquid chamber uses a magnetic-responsive thin film and a PDMS thin film at the top and bottom surface, respectively. In the pickup (printing) step, the top magnetic-responsive thin film is actuated by the external magnetic field to deform upward (downward), which transfers the motion to the bottom PDMS film and then induces a decreased (increased) pressure in the gas chamber (Figure 13). The pressure change in the gas chamber modulates the interfacial adhesion. The pressure change in the gas chamber as a function of the displacement profile of the top magnetic-responsive film is established in the analytical model, providing a comprehensive design guideline for the magnetic-assisted transfer printing.

With the above description of the various transfer printing methods, it can be safely concluded that each transfer method is associated with different characteristics for integration of the functional thin film devices on a compliant substrate. To help highlight the differences among the different transfer printing methods, we summarized the working principles, advantages, and limitations for each transfer printing method in Table 1.

3. Development and Applications of Transfer Printing in Flexible Electronics

Capable of assembling high-performance electronic devices onto a non-conventional (e.g., flexible or stretchable) substrate, the transfer printing technique has enabled wide-ranging applications from functional components to integrated device systems (Figure 14). The demonstrated functional components include transistors [22,23,35,41,52,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102], energy-harvesting devices [103,104], light-emitting diodes (LED) [27,105,106,107,108], flexible capacitors [6,109], thin-film solar cells [110,111,112], memories [1,113,114], and various functional sensors [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123]. A few representative system demonstrations are printed flexible integrated circuits [124,125,126,127,128,129], transient electronics [130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137], flexible displays [138,139], and many others.

3.1. Flexible Sensors

Various functional flexible sensors have been explored in bio-integrated electronics for the continuous monitoring of body temperature, pulse detection, emotion recognition, and exercise monitoring [142]. The application of transfer printing also goes beyond 2D sensors to heterogeneous 3D electronics [35], with applications in microfluidic devices, biological and chemical sensor systems, photonic and optoelectronic systems, and many others.

Transfer printing allows the assembly of nano-wires/micro-wires of GaAs, InP [21], and single-walled carbon nanotubes [22] into ordered arrays on plastic substrates. Combined with the technique of layer-by-layer assembly, contact transfer printing could use nanowires as building blocks to yield 3D multifunctional flexible electronics [143]. Due to the high surface-to-volume ratio, transferring hundreds of pre-aligned silicon nanowires onto plastic substrates results in ultrasensitive flexible chemical sensors [115]. A simple and fast nano-transfer printing (nTP) method that operates in ambient conditions [144,145] has shown potential to fabricate complementary inverter circuits, high-performance plastic transistors, and contact electrodes, which have electrical properties that are comparable to those fabricated with the conventional method [146]. Exploring the nTP method easily transfers the single-walled carbon nanonets (SWCNNs)-based flexible strain sensors that are fabricated on the Si substrate onto polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) and polyimide (PI) substrates with a superior strain sensitivity and linearity (Figure 15) [122].

With the use of an adhesive rubber stamp, the ultrathin piezoelectric strain sensor mounted onto an elastomeric substrate could measure the strain based on the voltage output with a resolution close to 10⁻⁶ (Figure 16) [118]. The magnetic sensor on the soft membrane can also be fabricated by a single-step direct transfer printing method [121].

3.2. Flexible Transistors

As an indispensable component in active devices, the transistor has been widely used in flexible sensors, displays, medical, and other electronic systems [147]. Transfer printing of single-crystal Si thin film transistors and GaAs microwires onto thin plastic sheets leads to flexible and bendable transistors [52,148] and metal semiconductor field-effect transistors (MESFETs) [147] that are robust to bending deformations. Similarly, transferring high electron mobility transistors to the plastic substrate yields the transistors in a bendable format that is robust to cyclic bending deformations [99]. The initial exploration of the single-crystal Si for stretchable transistors [12,24,149] was started with the creation of wavy Si thin ribbons on elastomeric substrates with the use of the pre-strain strategy. Exploring the technique of water-mediated transfer printing [63,64] also yields a ZnO-based thin film transistor with a high field-effect mobility (Figure 17).

The water-assisted transfer printing method [59] can also be used to transfer the pre-fabricated carbon nanotube (CNT)-based field effect transistors onto the surface of the 3D-printed water-soluble poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) substrate (Figure 18) [130]. The almost identical drain current versus gate voltage curves before and after transfer printing demonstrate the high fidelity of the method for fabricating high-performance CNT transistors.

Building on the contact transfer printing [143], the use of an octane and mineral oil mixture serves as a lubricant to help minimize the friction to result in highly ordered and aligned nanowires arrays for diodes and field-effect transistors [150]. Combined with a glass or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate, highly aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes transferred at low temperatures yields a fully transparent thin film transistor [151]. Similarly, transparent field-effect transistors with high optical transmittance can be fabricated by transferring graphene thin films onto elastomeric substrates [152,153].

3.3. Solar Cells

Solar modules consisting of arrays of solar microcells that are fabricated on Si wafers can be integrated into diverse spatial layouts on flexible substrates using transfer printing on a large scale [140]. Comparison of the open-circuit voltages of the devices between those prior and after transfer printing (Figure 19) [154] demonstrates a high degree of power conversion efficiency [6,140].

Building on the WTP method, a peel-and-stick process was developed to build thin-film solar cells (TFSCs) (Figure 20) on a nonconventional substrate, such as the surface of a cell phone, business card, and building window, without compromising its efficiency (Figure 21) [112,155].

3.4. Flexible Displays

Though the display is a core component of the human-computer interface, the conventional displays remain bulky and rigid. As an emerging technology, flexible displays are light and soft. Currently being explored as one of the key technologies in manufacturing flexible displays, transfer printing enables the transfer of various functional parts, such as the emissive or transport layers, from the growth substrate (donor) onto the device stack [138]. One representative example is the use of transfer printing for the integration of small crystalline-silicon circuits (chiplets) in the active-matrix organic light-emitting-diode (OLED) displays [139,156]. Prepared by the conventional photolithography, hundreds and thousands of chiplets could be transfer printed on the glass substrate via an elastomeric stamp to help build the integrated circuits. The OLED display is then formed over, and connected to, the chiplets. The resulting flexible OLED displays demonstrate an outstanding performance, highlighting the effectiveness of the transfer printing method for the fabrication of flexible displays.

With the help of the intaglio transfer printing method discussed in Section 2.8, wearable red-green-blue and white quantum light-emitting diodes (QLEDs) with a high resolution were demonstrated [89]. The high electroluminescence efficiency in these QLEDs was maintained even after being laminated on crumpled Al foil or on human skin (Figure 22). After multiple printing processes, the red–green–blue diode array was aligned to yield a high-resolution display (ranging from 441 p.p.i. to 2460 p.p.i.). The successful demonstrations clearly confirm the applicability of the intaglio transfer printing method to fabricate ultra-high resolution full-color deformable QLED arrays.

3.5. Flexible Energy-Harvesting/conversion devices

Because of the intrinsically brittle nature of piezoelectric inorganic materials, piezoelectric energy harvesting and conversion devices fabricated on the conventional substrate are rigid. To exploit the bending property of the thin film device, the highly crystalline piezoelectric ribbons with nanometer scale thicknesses and micrometer-scale widths were transferred from the host substrate onto the pre-strained rubber substrates. Release of the pre-strain yields a stretchable energy harvesting device with a wavy/buckled structure that can be repeatedly stretched and released for multiple cycles without damage (e.g., crack) [103]. Additionally, the piezoelectric ribbons grown on a crystal substrate that were transferred onto the elastomeric substrate over a large area yields energy conversion devices with a high piezoelectric coefficient [104]. The transfer printing method was also explored to manufacture high-performance Pb(Zr,Ti)O₃ (PZT) capacitors on plastic substrates for energy storage [109]. After forming the PZT films on the conventional wafer with the sol-gel method, an elastomeric stamp was used to transfer the thin films from the wafer onto the target plastic substrate. The front and backward bending tests (without damage) demonstrated that the flexible PZT thin film capacitor maintained its good electrical properties even under mechanical strain.

3.6. Flexible Electrodes

Using the thermal release transfer printing method, a stretchable neural electrode array with nine channels on a PDMS substrate was fabricated (Figure 23a) [58]. Attaching the device onto the dura mater of a rat in vivo allows the collection of electrocorticography (ECoG) signals (Figure 23b) and the detection of the steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) response induced by a flash (Figure 23c). Compared to a stainless-steel screw electrode consisting of four channels, the stretchable neural electrode array collected ECoG and SSVEP signals with higher signal-to-noise ratios, because of the conformal contact between the stretchable array and the curvilinear surface of the brain.

3.7. Other Devices

Transfer printing is also explored to fabricate high-performance, stretchable integrated circuits toward personal health monitors and other biomedical devices [125]. Creating a cylindrical nanostructure array on a responsive hydrogel, such as poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA), provides a new transfer printing strategy [40]. When the hydrogel adhesive film is exposed to water, a significant volume expansion in the PEGDMA structure leads to a large increase in the diameter and height of the hydrogel arrays (Figure 24b). Because of the macroscopic bending in the hydrogel film induced by hydration, the strong surface adhesion strength (≈191 kPa) in the dry state of the hydrogel adhesive sharply decreases (≈0.3 kPa) upon water exposure. Because of the strong adhesion, bringing the hydrogel adhesive into contact with the donor substrate allows the retrieval of the nanomembranes (Figure 24c). After contacting the attached nanomembranes with the receiving substrate, the water dropped on one side penetrates into the space between the hydrogel adhesive and the receiving substrate, which induces the hydrogel to swell (Figure 24d). The swelling-induced bending deformation greatly reduces the adhesion strength at the adhesive/receiver interface, thereby releasing the nanomembranes onto the receiving substrate. The applicability of the smart PEGDMA adhesive for transfer printing was demonstrated by transferring various semiconducting and metallic (e.g., Si, Au, Ag, etc.) micro-/nano-membranes onto different receiving substrates (Figure 25).

4. Conclusions and Outlook

Transfer printing technology facilitates the heterogeneous assembly of different materials (e.g., micro/nano-materials) into various functional devices arranged in two-dimensional and three-dimensional layouts. This review describes the recent progress of transfer printing methods involved in the fabrication process of flexible and stretchable electronic devices. Several representative transfer printing methods and their working principles were briefly discussed. With this versatile technology, various materials (e.g., graphene thin films, nano-wires/micro-wires, single-crystal Si ribbons, etc.) and prefabricated device components can be effectively transferred from donor substrates onto receiving substrates with excellent electrical performance. Because each transfer printing method is associated with unique characteristics, careful selection of the transfer printing method for a specific application needs to be conducted, especially in the burgeoning field of flexible and stretchable electronics. Additionally, the optimization of the existing transfer printing methods and development of new methods would motivate continued and expanded efforts in the future.

Among the wide-ranging opportunities for transfer printing technology, one focus may lie in the design and optimization of active, programmable elastomeric stamps for efficient assembly of structures/devices with complicated patterns. Low cost, high speed, high resolution, and reliable transfer printing methods represent other promising areas for future research. The critical geometrical and material parameters that modulate the interfacial adhesion in each method also need to be extensively studied to provide physical insights. The strong interest of small and large companies also requires close examination of the feasibility and applicability of various transfer printing methods in fabricating electronic devices on an industrial scale. A promising route is to explore the roll-to-roll transfer printing process. Major innovations in machine design, process recipes, material handling, and system integration are urgently needed for the achievement of an efficient roll-to-roll transfer printing process. On the other hand, it is highly desirable to explore transfer printing techniques for the integration of functional devices onto curvilinear substrates with various material compositions or even biological materials, which will certainly open up new opportunities in bio-integrated electronics and human-machine interfaces.

Author Contributions

H.Z., W.Q., Q.Y., X.Y., and H.W. wrote the manuscript and assembled the figures. Q.Y. and H.C. led the preparation of the manuscript and contributed to editorial modifications of the overall text.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants #: 11872308).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

1. Choi, J.M.; Kim, M.S.; Seol, M.L.; Choi, Y.K. Transfer of functional memory devices to any substrate, physica status solidi (RRL)—Rapid. Res. Lett. 2013, 7, 326–331.

2. Someya, T.; Kato, Y.; Sekitani, T.; Iba, S.; Noguchi, Y.; Murase, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Sakurai, T. Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12321.

3. Crone, B.; Dodabalapur, A.; Lin, Y.Y.; Filas, R.W.; Bao, Z.; Laduca, A.; Sarpeshkar, R.; Katz, H.E.; Li, W. Large-scale complementary integrated circuits based on organic transistors. Nature 2000, 403, 521.

4. Forrest, S.R. The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 2004, 428, 911.

5. Navaraj, W.T.; Gupta, S.; Lorenzelli, L.; Dahiya, R. Wafer Scale Transfer of Ultrathin Silicon Chips on Flexible Substrates for High Performance Bendable Systems. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1700277.

6. Caironi, M.; Noh, Y.Y. Large Area and Flexible Electronics; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., KGaA: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015.

7. Liu, X.; Long, Y.-Z.; Liao, L.; Duan, X.; Fan, Z. Large-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Nanowires for High-Performance Flexible Electronics. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1888–1900.

8. Leenen, M.A.M.; Arning, V.; Thiem, H.; Steiger, J.; Anselmann, R. Printable electronics: Flexibility for the future. Phys. Status Solidi A 2009, 206, 588–597.

9. Wang, X.; Gu, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, T. Silk-molded flexible, ultrasensitive, and highly stable electronic skin for monitoring human physiological signals. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1336–1342.

10. Fan, F.R.; Lin, L.; Zhu, G.; Wu, W.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.L. Transparent triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors based on micropatterned plastic films. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3109.

11. Pang, C.; Lee, G.Y.; Kim, T.I.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, H.N.; Ahn, S.H.; Suh, K.Y. A flexible and highly sensitive strain-gauge sensor using reversible interlocking of nanofibres. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 795–801.

12. Khang, D.Y.; Jiang, H.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. A stretchable form of single-crystal silicon for high-performance electronics on rubber substrates. Science 2006, 311, 208–212.

13. Sun, Y.; Kumar, V.; Adesida, I.; Rogers, J.A. Buckled and Wavy Ribbons of GaAs for High-Performance Electronics on Elastomeric Substrates. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2857–2862.

14. Sun, Y.; Choi, W.M.; Jiang, H.; Huang, Y.Y.; Rogers, J.A. Controlled buckling of semiconductor nanoribbons for stretchable electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 201.

15. Jiang, H.; Khang, D.Y.; Song, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Finite deformation mechanics in buckled thin films on compliant supports. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15607–15612. [Green Version]

16. Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Rogers, J.A.; Huang, Y. Mechanics of precisely controlled thin film buckling on elastomeric substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 133119.

17. Song, J.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Z.J.; Khang, D.Y.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A.; Lu, C.; Koh, C.G. Buckling of a stiff thin film on a compliant substrate in large deformation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2008, 45, 3107–3121. [Green Version]

18. Chen, C.; Tao, W.; Liu, Z.J.; Zhang, Y.W.; Song, J. Controlled buckling of thin film on elastomeric substrate in large deformation. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 2011, 1, 021001. [Green Version]

19. Zaumseil, J.; Meitl, M.A.; Hsu, J.W.P.; Acharya, B.R.; Baldwin, K.W.; Loo, Y.-L.; Rogers, J.A. Three-Dimensional and Multilayer Nanostructures Formed by Nanotransfer Printing. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1223–1227. [Green Version]

20. Menard, E.; Bilhaut, L.; Zaumseil, J.; Rogers, J.A. Improved Surface Chemistries, Thin Film Deposition Techniques, and Stamp Designs for Nanotransfer Printing. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6871–6878.

21. Sun, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Fabricating Semiconductor Nano/Microwires and Transfer Printing Ordered Arrays of Them onto Plastic Substrates. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1953–1959.

22. Meitl, M.A.; Zhou, Y.; Gaur, A.; Jeon, S.; Usrey, M.L.; Strano, M.S.; Rogers, J.A. Solution Casting and Transfer Printing Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1643–1647.

23. Hur, S.-H.; Park, O.O.; Rogers, J.A. Extreme bendability of single-walled carbon nanotube networks transferred from high-temperature growth substrates to plastic and their use in thin-film transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 243502.

24. Meitl, M.A.; Zhu, Z.T.; Kumar, V.; Lee, K.J.; Feng, X.; Huang, Y.Y.; Adesida, I.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 33–38.

25. Feng, X.; Meitl, M.A.; Bowen, A.M.; Huang, Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Competing Fracture in Kinetically Controlled Transfer Printing. Langmuir 2007, 23, 12555–12560.

26. Yu, J.; Bulović, V. Micropatterning metal electrode of organic light emitting devices using rapid polydimethylsiloxane lift-off. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 043102.

27. Park, S.I.; Xiong, Y.; Kim, R.H.; Elvikis, P.; Meitl, M.; Kim, D.H.; Wu, J.; Yoon, J.; Yu, C.J.; Liu, Z. Printed Assemblies of Inorganic Light-Emitting Diodes for Deformable and Semitransparent Displays. Science 2009, 325, 977–981. [Green Version]

28. Schmid, H.; Wolf, H.; Allenspach, R.; Riel, H.; Karg, S.; Michel, B.; Delamarche, E. Preparation of Metallic Films on Elastomeric Stamps and Their Application for Contact Processing and Contact Printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2003, 13, 145–153.

29. Bai, W.; Yang, H.; Ma, Y.; Chen, H.; Shin, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Q.; Kandela, I.; Liu, Z.; Kang, S.-K. Flexible Transient Optical Waveguides and Surface-Wave Biosensors Constructed from Monocrystalline Silicon. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801584.

30. Andrew, C.; Bowen, A.M.; Huang, Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Transfer Printing Techniques for Materials Assembly and Micro/Nanodevice Fabrication. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5284–5318.

31. Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Cai, S.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, B.; Feng, X. Stretchable and flexible photonics/electronics devices and transfer printing. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 2016, 46, 044607.

32. Andrew, C.; Wang, S.; Paulius, E.; Ferreira, P.M.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Active, Programmable Elastomeric Surfaces with Tunable Adhesion for Deterministic Assembly by Transfer Printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4476–4484.

33. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Lü, C.; Song, J.; Saeidpouraza, R.; Fang, B.; Zhong, Y.; Ferreira, P.M.; Rogers, J.A.; Huang, Y. Thermo-mechanical modeling of laser-driven non-contact transfer printing: Two-dimensional analysis. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 7122–7127.

34. Zhou, Y.; Hu, L.; Grüner, G. A method of printing carbon nanotube thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 123109.

35. Ahn, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, K.J.; Jeon, S.; Kang, S.J.; Sun, Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Heterogeneous Three-Dimensional Electronics by Use of Printed Semiconductor Nanomaterials. Science 2006, 314, 1754–1757.

36. Zhu, J.; Xue, M.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, M.; Duan, L.; Qiu, Y.; Cao, T. Facile Fabrication of Metallic Nanostructures by Tunable Cracking and Transfer Printing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12478–12482.

37. Thanh, Q.N.; Jeong, H.; Kim, J.; Kevek, J.W.; Ahn, Y.H.; Lee, S.; Minot, E.D.; Park, J.-Y. Transfer-Printing of As-Fabricated Carbon Nanotube Devices onto Various Substrates. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 4499–4504.

38. Winters, S.; Hallam, T.; Nolan, H.; Duesberg, G.S. Production of 3D-shaped graphene via transfer printing. Phys. Status Solidi B 2012, 249, 2515–2518.

39. Hohyun, K.; Andrew, C.; Hailong, N.; Agustin, M.; Jeffrey, D.E.; Paul, V.B. Silicon micro-masonry using elastomeric stamps for three-dimensional microfabrication. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2012, 22, 055018.

40. Yi, H.; Seong, M.; Sun, K.; Hwang, I.; Lee, K.; Cha, C.; Kim, T.-i.; Jeong, H.E. Wet-Responsive, Reconfigurable, and Biocompatible Hydrogel Adhesive Films for Transfer Printing of Nanomembranes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706498.

41. Tong, S.; Sun, J.; Yang, J. Printed Thin-Film Transistors: Research from China. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25902–25924.

42. Feng, X.; Lu, B.; Wu, J.; Lin, Y.; Song, J.; Song, G.; Huang, Y. Review on stretchable and flexible inorganic electronics. Acta Physica Sin. 2014, 63, 1–18.

43. Kim, T.-H.; Carlson, A.; Ahn, J.-H.; Won, S.M.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Kinetically controlled, adhesiveless transfer printing using microstructured stamps. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 113502.

44. Feng, X.; Cheng, H.; Bowen, A.M.; Carlson, A.W.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. A Finite-Deformation Mechanics Theory for Kinetically Controlled Transfer Printing. J. Appl. Mech. 2013, 80, 061023.

45. Kim, N.; Kang, H.; Lee, J.-H.; Kee, S.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K. Highly Conductive All-Plastic Electrodes Fabricated Using a Novel Chemically Controlled Transfer-Printing Method. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2317–2323.

46. Sim, K.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Kammoun, M.; Peng, Y.; Xu, M.; Gao, Y.; Song, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ardebili, H.; et al. High Fidelity Tape Transfer Printing Based On Chemically Induced Adhesive Strength Modulation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16133. [Green Version]

47. Jeong, J.W.; Yang, S.R.; Hur, Y.H.; Kim, S.W.; Baek, K.M.; Yim, S.; Jang, H.-I.; Park, J.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, C.-O.; et al. High-resolution nanotransfer printing applicable to diverse surfaces via interface-targeted adhesion switching. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5387. [Green Version]

48. Song, L.; Ci, L.; Gao, W.; Ajayan, P.M. Transfer Printing of Graphene Using Gold Film. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1353–1356.

49. Reuss, R.H.; Chalamala, B.R.; Moussessian, A.; Kane, M.G.; Kumar, A.; Zhang, D.C.; Rogers, J.A.; Hatalis, M.; Temple, D.; Moddel, G.; et al. Macroelectronics: Perspectives on Technology and Applications. Proc. IEEE 2005, 93, 1239–1256.

50. Blanchet, G.B.; Loo, Y.-L.; Rogers, J.A.; Gao, F.; Fincher, C.R. Large area, high resolution, dry printing of conducting polymers for organic electronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 463–465.

51. Briseno, A.L.; Roberts, M.; Ling, M.-M.; Moon, H.; Nemanick, E.J.; Bao, Z. Patterning organic semiconductors using “dry” poly(dimethylsiloxane) elastomeric stamps for thin film transistors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3880–3881.

52. Menard, E.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. Bendable single crystal silicon thin film transistors formed by printing on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 093507.

53. Yeom, J.; Shannon, M.A. Detachment Lithography of Photosensitive Polymers: A Route to Fabricating Three-Dimensional Structures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 289–295.

54. Ravikumar, V.; Yi, N.; Vepachedu, V.; Cheng, H. Transfer Printing for Cyber-Manufacturing Systems, in Industrial Internet of Things: Cybermanufacturing Systems; Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song, H., Rawat, D.B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 671–690.

55. Gao, Y.; Cheng, H. Assembly of Heterogeneous Materials for Biology and Electronics: From Bio-Inspiration to Bio-Integration. J. Electron. Packag. 2017, 139, 020801. [Green Version]

56. Linghu, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, C.; Song, J. Transfer printing techniques for flexible and stretchable inorganic electronics. NPJ Flex. Electron. 2018, 2, 26.

57. Cheng, H.; Li, M.; Wu, J.; Carlson, A.; Kim, S.; Huang, Y.; Kang, Z.; Hwang, K.C.; Rogers, J.A. A Viscoelastic Model for the Rate Effect in Transfer Printing. J. Appl. Mech. 2013, 80, 041019.

58. Yan, Z.; Pan, T.; Xue, M.; Chen, C.; Cui, Y.; Yao, G.; Huang, L.; Liao, F.; Jing, W.; Zhang, H.; et al. Thermal Release Transfer Printing for Stretchable Conformal Bioelectronics. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700251. [Green Version]

59. Lee, C.H.; Kim, D.R.; Zheng, X. Fabrication of Nanowire Electronics on Nonconventional Substrates by Water-Assisted Transfer Printing Method. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3435–3439.

60. Lee, C.H.; Kim, D.R.; Zheng, X. Transfer Printing Methods for Flexible Thin Film Solar Cells: Basic Concepts and Working Principles. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8746–8756.

61. Zhao, J.; Guo, Y.; Cai, L.; Li, H.; Wang, K.X.; Cho, I.S.; Lee, C.H.; Fan, S.; Zheng, X. High-Performance Ultrathin BiVO4 Photoanode on Textured Polydimethylsiloxane Substrates for Solar Water Splitting. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 68–75.

62. Wie, D.S.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, B.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Irazoqui, P.P.; Zheng, X.; Xu, B.; Lee, C.H. Wafer-recyclable, environment-friendly transfer printing for large-scale thin-film nanoelectronics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E7236–E7244.

63. Lee, B.H.; Cho, Y.H.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.-D.; Kim, S.H.; Sung, M.M. High-Resolution Patterning of Aluminum Thin Films with a Water-Mediated Transfer Process. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1714–1718.

64. Oh, K.; Lee, B.H.; Hwang, J.K.; Lee, H.; Im, S.; Sung, M.M. Water-Mediated Al Metal Transfer Printing with Contact Inking for Fabrication of Thin-Film Transistors. Small 2009, 5, 558–561.

65. Huang, Y.Y.; Zhou, W.; Hsia, K.J.; Menard, E.; Park, J.-U.; Rogers, J.A.; Alleyne, A.G. Stamp Collapse in Soft Lithography. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8058–8068.

66. Hsia, K.J.; Huang, Y.; Menard, E.; Park, J.-U.; Zhou, W.; Rogers, J.; Fulton, J.M. Collapse of stamps for soft lithography due to interfacial adhesion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 154106. [Green Version]

67. Kim, S.; Wu, J.; Carlson, A.; Jin, S.H.; Kovalsky, A.; Glass, P.; Liu, Z.; Ahmed, N.; Elgan, S.L.; Chen, W.; et al. Microstructured elastomeric surfaces with reversible adhesion and examples of their use in deterministic assembly by transfer printing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17095–17100. [Green Version]

68. Wu, J.; Kim, S.; Chen, W.; Carlson, A.; Hwang, K.-C.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Mechanics of reversible adhesion. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 8657–8662.

69. Chen, H.; Feng, X.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Experiments and viscoelastic analysis of peel test with patterned strips for applications to transfer printing. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2013, 61, 1737–1752.

70. Chen, H.; Feng, X.; Chen, Y. Directionally controlled transfer printing using micropatterned stamps. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 151607.

71. Jeong, J.; Kim, J.; Song, K.; Autumn, K.; Lee, J. Geckoprinting: Assembly of microelectronic devices on unconventional surfaces by transfer printing with isolated gecko setal arrays. J. R. Soc. Interface 2014, 11, 20140627.

72. Yoo, B.; Cho, S.; Seo, S.; Lee, J. Elastomeric Angled Microflaps with Reversible Adhesion for Transfer-Printing Semiconductor Membranes onto Dry Surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19247–19253.

73. Carlson, A.; Kim-Lee, H.-J.; Wu, J.; Elvikis, P.; Cheng, H.; Kovalsky, A.; Elgan, S.; Yu, Q.; Ferreira, P.M.; Huang, Y.; et al. Shear-enhanced adhesiveless transfer printing for use in deterministic materials assembly. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 264104.

74. Yang, Y.S.; Andrew, C.; Huanyu, C.; Qingmin, Y.; Numair, A.; Jian, W.; Seok, K.; Metin, S.; Ferreira, P.M.; Yonggang, H.; et al. Elastomer Surfaces with Directionally Dependent Adhesion Strength and Their Use in Transfer Printing with Continuous Roll-to-Roll Applications. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2117–2122.

75. Cheng, H.; Wu, J.; Yu, Q.; Kim-Lee, H.-J.; Carlson, A.; Turner, K.T.; Hwang, K.-C.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. An analytical model for shear-enhanced adhesiveless transfer printing. Mech. Res. Commun. 2012, 43, 46–49.

76. Liu, C.; Qin, H.; Mather, P.T. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1543–1558.

77. Koerner, H.; Price, G.; Pearce, N.A.; Alexander, M.; Vaia, R.A. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites—Stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 115–120.

78. Yu, K.; Ge, Q.; Qi, H.J. Reduced time as a unified parameter determining fixity and free recovery of shape memory polymers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3066. [Green Version]

79. Huang, W.M.; Yang, B.; An, L.; Li, C.; Chan, Y.S. Water-driven programmable polyurethane shape memory polymer: Demonstration and mechanism. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 114105.

80. Eisenhaure, J.D.; Rhee, S.I.; Al-Okaily, A.M.; Carlson, A.; Ferreira, P.M.; Kim, S. The Use of Shape Memory Polymers for Microassembly by Transfer Printing. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2014, 23, 1012–1014.

81. Eisenhaure, J.D.; Xie, T.; Varghese, S.; Kim, S. Microstructured Shape Memory Polymer Surfaces with Reversible Dry Adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7714–7717.

82. Xue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, X.; Kim, S.; Rogers, J.A.; Huang, Y. A theoretical model of reversible adhesion in shape memory surface relief structures and its application in transfer printing. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2015, 77, 27–42.

83. Saeidpourazar, R.; Li, R.; Li, Y.; Sangid, M.D.; Lu, C.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A.; Ferreira, P.M. Laser-Driven Micro Transfer Placement of Prefabricated Microstructures. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2012, 21, 1049–1058.

84. Saeidpourazar, R.; Sangid, M.D.; Rogers, J.A.; Ferreira, P.M. A prototype printer for laser driven micro-transfer printing. J. Manuf. Process. 2012, 14, 416–424.

85. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Lü, C.; Song, J.; Saeidpourazar, R.; Fang, B.; Zhong, Y.; Ferreira, P.M.; Rogers, J.A.; Huang, Y. Axisymmetric thermo-mechanical analysis of laser-driven non-contact transfer printing. Int. J. Fract. 2012, 176, 189–194. [Green Version]

86. Ala’a, M.; Rogers, J.A.; Ferreira, P.M. Characterization of Delamination in Laser Micro Transfer Printing. J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2013, 2, 011002.

87. Ala’a, M.; Ferreira, P.M. Multi-physics modeling for laser micro-transfer printing delamination. J. Manuf. Process. 2015, 20, 414–424. [Green Version]

88. Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, R.; Song, J. An Accurate Thermomechanical Model for Laser-Driven Microtransfer Printing. J. Appl. Mech. 2017, 84, 064501.

89. Choi, M.K.; Yang, J.; Kang, K.; Kim, D.C.; Choi, C.; Park, C.; Kim, S.J.; Chae, S.I.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, J.H.; et al. Wearable red-green-blue quantum dot light-emitting diode array using high-resolution intaglio transfer printing. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7149.

90. Yu, Q.; chen, F.; Zhou, H.; Yu, X. Mechanical model of electromagnetic-assisted transfer printing stamp containinga four prism cavity. Sci. Sin. Inf. 2018, 48, 713–723. (In Chinese)

91. Yu, Q.; Chen, F.; Zhou, H.; Yu, X.; Cheng, H.; Wu, H. Design and Analysis of Magnetic-Assisted Transfer Printing. J. Appl. Mech. 2018, 85, 101009.

92. Linghu, C.; Wang, C.; Cen, N.; Wu, J.; Lai, Z.; Song, J. Rapidly tunable and highly reversible bio-inspired dry adhesion for transfer printing in air and a vacuum. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 30–37.

93. Hines, D.R.; Mezhenny, S.; Breban, M.; Williams, E.D.; Ballarotto, V.W.; Esen, G.; Southard, A.; Fuhrer, M.S. Nanotransfer printing of organic and carbon nanotube thin-film transistors on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 163101. [Green Version]

94. Sun, Y.; Menard, E.; Rogers, J.A.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, S.; Chen, G.; Adesida, I.; Dettmer, R.; Cortez, R.; Tewksbury, A. Gigahertz operation in flexible transistors on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 183509.

95. Ko, H.C.; Baca, A.J.; Rogers, J.A. Bulk Quantities of Single-Crystal Silicon Micro-/Nanoribbons Generated from Bulk Wafers. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2318–2324. [Green Version]

96. Sharma, B.K.; Bongkyun, J.; Eun, L.J.; Sang-Hoon, B.; Woong, K.T.; Hak-Joo, L.; Jae-Hyun, K.; Jong-Hyun, A. Load-Controlled Roll Transfer of Oxide Transistors for Stretchable Electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2024–2032.

97. Yu, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, Z.; Ma, D.; Han, Y. Metal printing with modified polymer bonding lithography. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 263517.

98. Lee., K.; Motala, M.J.; Meitl, M.A.; Childs, W.R.; Menard, E.; Shim, A.K.; Rogers, J.A.; Nuzzo, R.G. Large-Area, Selective Transfer of Microstructured Silicon: A Printing—Based Approach to High-Performance Thin-Film Transistors Supported on Flexible Substrates. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2332–2336.

99. Lee, K.J.; Meitl, M.A.; Ahn, J.H.; Rogers, J.A.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Kumar, V.; Adesida, I. Bendable GaN high electron mobility transistors on plastic substrates. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 1239–1268.

100. Mack, S.; Meitl, M.A.; Baca, A.J.; Zhu, Z.-T.; Rogers, J.A. Mechanically flexible thin-film transistors that use ultrathin ribbons of silicon derived from bulk wafers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 213101.

101. Liang, X.; Fu, Z.; Chou, S.Y. Graphene Transistors Fabricated via Transfer-Printing In Device Active-Areas on Large Wafer. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3840–3844.

102. Kim, H.-S.; Won, S.M.; Ha, Y.-G.; Ahn, J.-H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T.J.; Rogers, J.A. Self-assembled nanodielectrics and silicon nanomembranes for low voltage, flexible transistors, and logic gates on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 183504.

103. Qi, Y.; Jafferis, N.T.; Lyons, K.; Lee, C.M.; Ahmad, H.; McAlpine, M.C. Piezoelectric Ribbons Printed onto Rubber for Flexible Energy Conversion. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 524–528. [Green Version]

104. Qi, Y.; Kim, J.; Nguyen, T.D.; Lisko, B.; Purohit, P.K.; McAlpine, M.C. Enhanced Piezoelectricity and Stretchability in Energy Harvesting Devices Fabricated from Buckled PZT Ribbons. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1331–1336.

105. Kim, R.-H.; Bae, M.-H.; Kim, D.G.; Cheng, H.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, D.-H.; Li, M.; Wu, J.; Du, F.; Kim, H.-S.; et al. Stretchable, Transparent Graphene Interconnects for Arrays of Microscale Inorganic Light Emitting Diodes on Rubber Substrates. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3881–3886.

106. McAlpine, M.C.; Friedman, R.S.; Lieber, C.M. High-Performance Nanowire Electronics and Photonics and Nanoscale Patterning on Flexible Plastic Substrates. Proc. IEEE 2005, 93, 1357–1363. [Green Version]

107. Kim, T.-I.; Jung, Y.H.; Song, J.; Kim, D.; Li, Y.; Kim, H.-s.; Song, I.-S.; Wierer, J.J.; Pao, H.A.; Huang, Y.; et al. High-Efficiency, Microscale GaN Light-Emitting Diodes and Their Thermal Properties on Unusual Substrates. Small 2012, 8, 1643–1649.

108. Kim, T.-I.; Lee, S.H.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Shin, G.; Lee, S.D.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A.; Yu, J.S. Temperature- and size-dependent characteristics in ultrathin inorganic light-emitting diodes assembled by transfer printing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 051901.

109. Rho, J.; Kim, S.J.; Heo, W.; Lee, N.E.; Lee, H.S.; Ahn, J.H. PbZrxTi1−xO3 Ferroelectric Thin-Film Capacitors for Flexible Nonvolatile Memory Applications. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2010, 31, 1017–1019.

110. Koo, M.; Park, K.-I.; Lee, S.H.; Suh, M.; Jeon, D.Y.; Choi, J.W.; Kang, K.; Lee, K.J. Bendable Inorganic Thin-Film Battery for Fully Flexible Electronic Systems. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4810–4816.

111. Kang, M.-G.; Park, H.J.; Ahn, S.H.; Guo, L.J. Transparent Cu nanowire mesh electrode on flexible substrates fabricated by transfer printing and its application in organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 1179–1184.

112. Lee, C.H.; Kim, D.R.; Cho, I.S.; William, N.; Wang, Q.; Zheng, X. Peel-and-Stick: Fabricating Thin Film Solar Cell on Universal Substrates. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 1000.

113. Lin, Y.; Xu, H.Y.; Wang, Z.Q.; Cong, T.; Liu, W.Z.; Ma, H.L.; Liu, Y.C. Transferable and flexible resistive switching memory devices based on PMMA films with embedded Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 193503.

114. Son, D.; Lee, J.; Qiao, S.; Ghaffari, R.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.E.; Song, C.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, D.J.; Jun, S.W.; et al. Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 397.

115. McAlpine, M.C.; Ahmad, H.; Wang, D.; Heath, J.R. Highly ordered nanowire arrays on plastic substrates for ultrasensitive flexible chemical sensors. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 379–384. [Green Version]

116. Webb, R.C.; Bonifas, A.P.; Behnaz, A.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, K.J.; Cheng, H.; Shi, M.; Bian, Z.; Liu, Z.; Kim, Y.-S.; et al. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 938.

117. Huang, X.; Cheng, H.; Chen, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Ouyang, S.c.; Kong, G.W.; Yu, C.; et al. Epidermal Impedance Sensing Sheets for Precision Hydration Assessment and Spatial Mapping. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 2848–2857. [Green Version]

118. Takahiro, Y.; Hironao, O.; Toshihiro, I.; Takeshi, K. Manufacturing process for piezoelectric strain sensor sheet involving transfer printing methods. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 10ND08.

119. Jidong, S.; Xinming, L.; Huanyu, C.; Zhuangjian, L.; Lingyu, Z.; Tingting, Y.; Zhaohe, D.; Zengguang, C.; Enzheng, S.; Long, Y.; et al. Graphene Reinforced Carbon Nanotube Networks for Wearable Strain Sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 2078–2084.

120. O’Neill, J.; Lu, J.; Dockter, R.; Kowalewski, T. Stretchable, Flexible, Scalable Smart Skin Sensors for Robotic Position and Force Estimation. Sensors 2018, 18, 953.

121. Melzer, M.; Karnaushenko, D.; Lin, G.; Baunack, S.; Makarov, D.; Schmidt, O.G. Direct transfer of magnetic sensor devices to elastomeric supports for stretchable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1333–1338.

122. Hsu, C.C.; Chao, R.M.; Liu, C.W.; Steven, Y.L. Evaluation of the gauge factor for single-walled carbon nanonets on the flexible plastic substrates by nano-transfer-printing. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2011, 21, 075012.

123. Lee, W.S.; Choi, J.-h.; Park, I.; Lee, J. Room-Temperature Compressive Transfer Printing of Nanowires for Nanoelectronic Devices. Langmuir 2012, 28, 17851–17858.

124. Chen, J.H.; Ishigami, M.; Jang, C.; Hines, D.R.; Fuhrer, M.S.; Williams, E.D. Printed Graphene Circuits. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3623–3627. [Green Version]

125. Kim, D.H.; Ahn, J.H.; Choi, W.M.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, T.H.; Song, J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Liu, Z.; Lu, C.; Rogers, J.A. Strechable and foldable silicon integrated circuits. Science 2008, 320, 507–511.

126. Cho, K.H.; Gunchul, S.; Shuodao, W.; Stoykovich, M.P.; Won, L.J.; Dong-Hun, K.; Sook, H.J.; Yonggang, H.; Keh-Chih, H.; Rogers, J.A. Curvilinear Electronics Formed Using Silicon Membrane Circuits and Elastomeric Transfer Elements. Small 2009, 5, 2703–2709.

127. Dae-Hyeong, K.; Yun-Soung, K.; Jian, W.; Zhuangjian, L.; Jizhou, S.; Hoon-Sik, K.; Huang, Y.Y.; Keh-Chih, H.; Rogers, J.A. Ultrathin Silicon Circuits With Strain-Isolation Layers and Mesh Layouts for High-Performance Electronics on Fabric, Vinyl, Leather, and Paper. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3703–3707.

128. Dae-Hyeong, K.; Zhuangjian, L.; Yun-Soung, K.; Jian, W.; Jizhou, S.; Hoon-Sik, K.; Yonggang, H.; Keh-chih, H.; Yongwei, Z.; Rogers, J.A. Optimized Structural Designs for Stretchable Silicon Integrated Circuits. Small 2009, 5, 2841–2847.

129. Kim, D.-H.; Song, J.; Choi, W.M.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, R.-H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.Y.; Hwang, K.-C.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Rogers, J.A. Materials and noncoplanar mesh designs for integrated circuits with linear elastic responses to extreme mechanical deformations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008.

130. Yoon, J.; Han, J.; Choi, B.; Lee, Y.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.; Lim, M.; Kang, M.-H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, D.M.; et al. Three-Dimensional Printed Poly(vinyl alcohol) Substrate with Controlled On-Demand Degradation for Transient Electronics. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 6006–6012.

131. Chang, J.-K.; Chang, H.-P.; Guo, Q.; Koo, J.; Wu, C.-I.; Rogers, J.A. Biodegradable Electronic Systems in 3D, Heterogeneously Integrated Formats. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704955.

132. Chang, J.-K.; Fang, H.; Bower, C.A.; Song, E.; Yu, X.; Rogers, J.A. Materials and processing approaches for foundry-compatible transient electronics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E5522–E5529. [Green Version]

133. Yu, K.J.; Kuzum, D.; Hwang, S.-W.; Kim, B.H.; Juul, H.; Kim, N.H.; Won, S.M.; Chiang, K.; Trumpis, M.; Richardson, A.G.; et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronics for transient spatiotemporal mapping of electrical activity from the cerebral cortex. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 782.

134. Kim, D.-H.; Viventi, J.; Amsden, J.J.; Xiao, J.; Vigeland, L.; Kim, Y.-S.; Blanco, J.A.; Panilaitis, B.; Frechette, E.S.; Contreras, D.; et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 511.

135. Hwang, S.-W.; Tao, H.; Kim, D.-H.; Cheng, H.; Song, J.-K.; Rill, E.; Brenckle, M.A.; Panilaitis, B.; Won, S.M.; Kim, Y.-S.; et al. A physically transient form of silicon electronics. Science 2012, 337, 1640–1644.

136. Hwang, S.-W.; Kim, D.-H.; Tao, H.; Kim, T.-i.; Kim, S.; Yu, K.J.; Panilaitis, B.; Jeong, J.-W.; Song, J.-K.; Omenetto, F.G.; et al. Materials and Fabrication Processes for Transient and Bioresorbable High-Performance Electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 4087–4093.

137. Hwang, S.-W.; Song, J.-K.; Huang, X.; Cheng, H.; Kang, S.-K.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Yu, S.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. High-Performance Biodegradable/Transient Electronics on Biodegradable Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3905–3911.

138. Koo, J.H.; Kim, D.C.; Shim, H.J.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, D.-H. Flexible and Stretchable Smart Display: Materials, Fabrication, Device Design, and System Integration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801834.

139. Cok, R.S.; Hamer, J.W.; Bower, C.A.; Menard, E.; Bonafede, S. AMOLED displays with transfer-printed integrated circuits. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2011, 19, 335–341.

140. Yoon, J.; Baca, A.J.; Park, S.-I.; Elvikis, P.; Geddes Iii, J.B.; Li, L.; Kim, R.H.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S.; Kim, T.-H.; et al. Ultrathin silicon solar microcells for semitransparent, mechanically flexible and microconcentrator module designs. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 907.

141. Lin, Q.; Huang, H.; Jing, Y.; Fu, H.; Chang, P.; Li, D.; Yao, Y.; Fan, Z. Flexible photovoltaic technologies. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 1233–1247.

142. Yu, C.; Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Jiang, H. A stretchable temperature sensor based on elastically buckled thin film devices on elastomeric substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 141912.

143. Javey, A.; Nam; Friedman, R.S.; Yan, H.; Lieber, C.M. Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Nanowires for Three-Dimensional, Multifunctional Electronics. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 773–777. [Green Version]

144. Loo, Y.-L.; Willett, R.L.; Baldwin, K.W.; Rogers, J.A. Additive, nanoscale patterning of metal films with a stamp and a surface chemistry mediated transfer process: Applications in plastic electronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 562–564.

145. Loo, Y.-L.; Willett, R.L.; Baldwin, K.W.; Rogers, J.A. Interfacial Chemistries for Nanoscale Transfer Printing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7654–7655.

146. Loo, Y.-L.; Lang, D.V.; Rogers, J.A.; Hsu, J.W.P. Electrical Contacts to Molecular Layers by Nanotransfer Printing. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 913–917. [Green Version]

147. Sun, Y.; Kim, S.; Adesida, I.; Rogers, J.A. Bendable GaAs metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors formed with printed GaAs wire arrays on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 083501.

148. Menard, E.; Lee, K.J.; Khang, D.-Y.; Nuzzo, R.G.; Rogers, J.A. A printable form of silicon for high performance thin film transistors on plastic substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 5398–5400.

149. Baca, A.J.; Meitl, M.A.; Ko, H.C.; Mack, S.; Kim, H.S.; Dong, J.; Ferreira, P.M.; Rogers, J.A. Printable Single-Crystal Silicon Micro/Nanoscale Ribbons, Platelets and Bars Generated from Bulk Wafers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3051–3062.

150. Fan, Z.; Ho, J.C.; Jacobson, Z.A.; Yerushalmi, R.; Alley, R.L.; Razavi, H.; Javey, A. Wafer-Scale Assembly of Highly Ordered Semiconductor Nanowire Arrays by Contact Printing. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 20–25. [Green Version]

151. Ishikawa, F.N.; Chang, H.-k.; Ryu, K.; Chen, P.-c.; Badmaev, A.; Gomez De Arco, L.; Shen, G.; Zhou, C. Transparent Electronics Based on Transfer Printed Aligned Carbon Nanotubes on Rigid and Flexible Substrates. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 73–79.

152. Lee, S.-K.; Kim, B.J.; Jang, H.; Yoon, S.C.; Lee, C.; Hong, B.H.; Rogers, J.A.; Cho, J.H.; Ahn, J.-H. Stretchable Graphene Transistors with Printed Dielectrics and Gate Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4642–4646.

153. Li, X.; Cai, W.; An, J.; Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Yang, D.; Piner, R.; Velamakanni, A.; Jung, I.; Tutuc, E.; et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 2009, 324, 1312–1314.

154. Tanabe, K.; Watanabe, K.; Arakawa, Y. Flexible thin-film InAs/GaAs quantum dot solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 192102. [Green Version]

155. Lee, C.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Zou, C.; Cho, I.S.; Weisse, J.M.; Nemeth, W.; Wang, Q.; van Duin, A.C.T.; Kim, T.-S.; Zheng, X. Peel-and-Stick: Mechanism Study for Efficient Fabrication of Flexible/Transparent Thin-film Electronics. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2917.

156. Bower, C.A.; Menard, E.; Bonafede, S.; Hamer, J.W.; Cok, R.S. Transfer-Printed Microscale Integrated Circuits for High Performance Display Backplanes. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 1, 1916–1922.