It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) and the weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) represent two robust and widely used methods for MEG/EEG functional connectivity estimation. Interestingly, both methods have been shown to detect relative alterations of brain functional connectivity in conditions associated with changes in the level of consciousness, such as following severe brain injury or under anaesthesia. Despite these promising findings, it was unclear whether wPLI and wSMI may account for distinct or similar types of functional interactions. Using simulated high-density (hd-)EEG data, we demonstrate that, while wPLI has high sensitivity for couplings presenting a mixture of linear and nonlinear interdependencies, only wSMI can detect purely nonlinear interaction dynamics. Moreover, we evaluated the potential impact of these differences on real experimental data by computing wPLI and wSMI connectivity in hd-EEG recordings of 12 healthy adults during wakefulness and deep (N3-)sleep, characterised by different levels of consciousness. In line with the simulation-based findings, this analysis revealed that both methods have different sensitivity for changes in brain connectivity across the two vigilance states. Our results indicate that the conjoint use of wPLI and wSMI may represent a powerful tool to study the functional bases of consciousness in physiological and pathological conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Betta, Monica 1 ; Cecchetti, Luca 1
; Canales-Johnson, Andrés 2 ; Ricciardi, Emiliano 1 ; Siclari, Francesca 3
; Pietrini, Pietro 1 ; Chennu, Srivas 4 ; Bernardi, Giulio 5 1 MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
2 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; The Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences Research Center (CINPSI Neurocog), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
3 Center for Investigation and Research on Sleep, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
4 School of Computing, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
5 MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy; Center for Investigation and Research on Sleep, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy




