It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
With improving biofabrication technology, 3D bioprinted constructs increasingly resemble real tissues. However, the fundamental principles describing how cell-generated forces within these constructs drive deformations, mechanical instabilities, and structural failures have not been established, even for basic biofabricated building blocks. Here we investigate mechanical behaviours of 3D printed microbeams made from living cells and extracellular matrix, bioprinting these simple structural elements into a 3D culture medium made from packed microgels, creating a mechanically controlled environment that allows the beams to evolve under cell-generated forces. By varying the properties of the beams and the surrounding microgel medium, we explore the mechanical behaviours exhibited by these structures. We observe buckling, axial contraction, failure, and total static stability, and we develop mechanical models of cell-ECM microbeam mechanics. We envision these models and their generalizations to other fundamental 3D shapes to facilitate the predictable design of biofabricated structures using simple building blocks in the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA
2 University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA
3 Princeton University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton, NJ, USA
4 University of Florida, George and Josephine Butler Polymer Research Laboratory, Center for Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Gainesville, FL, USA
5 Division of Neuro-Oncology, Preston A. Wells, Jr. Center for Brain Tumor Therapy, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
6 University of Florida, Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Preston A. Wells Jr. Center for Brain Tumor Therapy, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Gainesville, FL, USA
7 Auburn University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn, AL, USA
8 University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA; University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA
9 University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA; University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA; University of Florida, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, FL, USA