It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In current molecular medicine, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for transcript variant detection and multivariable analyses are valid methods for evaluating gene expression, cancer mechanisms, and prognoses of patients. We conducted RNA-sequencing on samples from patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) using NGS and performed multivariable analysis on gene expression data and correlations focused on Th-1/Th-2 helper T cell balance and immune checkpoint to identify diagnosis/prognosis markers and cancer immune pathways in PCNSL. We selected 84 transcript variants to limit the analysis range for Th-1/Th-2 balance and stimulatory and inhibitory checkpoints in 31 PCNSLs. Of these, 21 highly-expressed transcript variants were composed of the formulas for prognoses based on Th-1/Th-2 status and checkpoint activities. Using formulas, Th-1low, Th-2high, and stimulatory checkpointhigh resulted in poor prognoses. Further, Th-1highTh-2low was associated with good prognoses. On the other hand, CD40-001high and CD70-001high as stimulatory genes, and LAG3-001high, PDCD1 (PD-1)-001/002/003high, and PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2)-201low as inhibitory genes were associated with poor prognoses. Interestingly, Th-1highTh-2low and Th-1lowTh-2high were correlated with stimulatory checkpointlow as CD70-001low and inhibitory checkpointlow as HAVCR2 (TIM-3)-001low and PDCD1LG2-001/201low, respectively. Focused on the inhibitory checkpoint, specific variants of CD274 (PD-L1)-001 and PDCD1-002 served severe hazard ratios. In particular, PDCD1-002high by a cut off score was associated with poor prognoses, in addition to PDCD1-001/003high, PDCD1LG2-201low, and LAG3-001high. These results mainly suggest that expression of transcript variants of PDCD1 and PDCD1LG2 on the Th-1/Th-2 balance enable prognostic prediction in PCNSL. This study provides insights for development of molecular target therapies and identification of diagnosis/prognosis markers in PCNSL.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Laboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
2 Center for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
3 Department of Genomic Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
4 Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
5 Department of Neurosurgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan
6 Department of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan
7 Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
8 Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
9 Department of Pathology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan