It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this paper the quantitative risk analysis procedure has been used to face two specific aspects of the fire safety design in road and rail tunnel: • the smoke control system effectiveness; • the spalling effect and structural reliability of the liners. The first example deals with the risk comparative assessment of two alternative systems for smoke control in a road tunnel. The societal risk indicator has been used to select the more effective system. The second one aims to consider a reliability based approach for structural design of the tunnel liners in order to identify the design fire load preventing from the spalling effect at a given probability level.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer