It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Different kinematic models have been proposed for the triple junction between the North American, Cocos and Caribbean plates. The two most commonly accepted hypotheses on its driving mechanism are (a) the North American drag of the forearc and (b) the Cocos Ridge subduction push. We present an updated GPS velocity field which is analyzed together with earthquake focal mechanisms and regional relief. The two hypotheses have been used to make kinematic predictions that are tested against the available data. An obliquity analysis is also presented to discuss the potential role of slip partitioning as driving mechanism. The North American drag model presents a better fit to the observations, although the Cocos Ridge push model explains the data in Costa Rica and Southern Nicaragua. Both mechanisms must be active, being the driving of the Central American forearc towards the NW analogous to a push-pull train. The forearc sliver moves towards the west-northwest at a rate of 12–14 mm/yr, being pinned to the North American plate in Chiapas and western Guatemala, where the strike-slip motion on the volcanic arc must be very small.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Geodynamics, Stratigraphy and Paleontology, Faculty of Geology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
2 Dpto de Ingeniería Topográfica y Cartografía, ETSI Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
3 Department of Geodynamics, Stratigraphy and Paleontology, Faculty of Geology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; IGEO Geosciences Institute, Madrid, Spain
4 Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Science Faculty, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
5 Geohazards InSAR Laboratory and Modelling Group, Geoscience Research Department, Geological Survey of Spain (IGME), Madrid, Spain