Introduction
Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end‐stage renal disease (Collins et al, ). Although a growing body of evidence shows that injury of podocytes, also known as glomerular visceral epithelial cells, critically contributes to the progression of diabetic nephropathy (Wiggins, ; May et al, ), the molecular determinants underlying podocyte dysfunction are still poorly understood. Besides genetic mutations, aberrant epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation or histone modification may play a pivotal role in causing podocyte injury (Feliers, ; Majumder & Advani, ). Previous studies have shown that treatment with 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine, a DNA demethylating agent, substantially increased levels of podocyte‐specific markers such as nephrin and Neph3 in human immortalized podocytes or human embryotic kidney cell lines (Ristola et al, ). On the other hand, positive or negative actions of various histone deacetylases (HDACs) such as SIRT1, SIRT6, HDAC2, HDAC4, and HDAC9 as well as histone acetyltransferases (HATs) such as GCN5 have been linked to podocyte dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy (Noh et al, ; Bock et al, ; Wang et al, ; Yacoub et al, ; Liu et al, , ). Additionally, histone methylation and demethylation can also influence the expression of a wide variety of protective and pathogenic genes in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Generally, methylation at histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4), lysine 36 (H3K36), and lysine 79 (H3K79) is associated with gene expression, whereas methylation at histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and lysine 27 (H3K27) as well as methylation at histone H4 lysine 20 (H4K20) is associated with gene repression. Previously, Lefevre et al () have shown that loss of an essential component PTIP of the H3K4 methyltransferase complex in podocytes caused a slowly progressing proteinuria. More recently, Majumder et al () reported that loss of the histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) mark in podocytes by inactivation or deletion of EZH2, a H3K27 methylating enzyme, also resulted in podocyte dedifferentiation and glomerular injury. Conversely, pharmacological inhibition of two demethylating enzymes KDM6A (also called UTX) and KDM6B (also called JMJD3), which specifically demethylate H3K27 dimethylation (H3K27me2) and H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), attenuated glomerular disease (Majumder et al, ). Despite the importance of various histone‐modifying enzymes and DNA methylation patterns in modulating podocyte function, the detailed connection between the global epigenetic reprogramming and the resultant signal transduction or gene expression under diabetic conditions remains obscure.
Kruppel‐like factors (KLFs) are evolutionarily conserved and structurally related zinc finger‐containing transcription factors, which also share sequence homology with specificity proteins such as SP1 and SP3 (McConnell & Yang, ; Bialkowska et al, ). Like SP subfamily members, KLFs mediate transcriptional activation and/or repression by recognizing similar GC‐rich consensus sequences in target DNA, along with the recruitment of specific co‐activators, co‐repressors, or other chromatin remodeling proteins (McConnell & Yang, ; Bialkowska et al, ). Accumulating evidence has implicated that KLFs play a vital role in multiple biological processes and diseases. For instance, several reports have shown that loss of specific KLF members including KLF2, KLF4, KLF6, and KLF15 in glomerular endothelial cells or podocytes resulted in exacerbation of kidney injury under various stress conditions (Mallipattu et al, , , ; Hayashi et al, , ; Zhong et al, , ). These results indicate that all these reported KLF members act to protect kidney from damage. To date, there is no evidence showing whether other KLF family members in these cell types have opposite actions and contribute to kidney dysfunction.
In this study, we report a new deleterious pathway driven by a positive feedback loop involving KDM6A and KLF10, a SP/KLF member originally identified as a TGF‐β‐inducible early gene product (Subramaniam et al, ), in podocytes under diabetic conditions, and suggest that inhibition of the regulatory pathway may help prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy.
Results
Linking epigenetic modifications to podocyte dysfunction
In order to explore the functional roles of epigenetic regulation such as DNA methylation or histone modification in podocyte dysfunction, we initially used nephrin as a marker to study its regulated expression in immortalized mouse podocytes. Treatment of cultured podocytes with high glucose (HG), but not high mannitol (Mann), decreased nephrin expression (Fig A), which was correlated with increased DNA methylation at the nephrin gene promoter as determined by methylation‐specific PCR (Fig B and Appendix Fig S1). On the other hand, treatment with pargyline hydrochloride, a pan‐KDM inhibitor, prevented the effects of HG on nephrin expression and its promoter DNA methylation (Fig C and D), suggesting that certain KDM enzymes directly or indirectly modulate nephrin expression. After examining mRNA levels of various KDMs in podocytes, our results showed that HG treatment significantly up‐regulated KDM6A, but not KDM3A, KDM4A, KDM5A, KDM5B, and KDM6B (Fig E). KDM6A, also named UTX, is an X‐linked protein that functions to demethylate H3K27me3 and H3K27me2, two repressive histone markers (Wang et al, ; Rotili & Mai, ). Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated that increased KDM6A expression, along with reduced levels of H3K27me3 and H3K27me2, was detected specifically in HG‐treated podocytes, but not in mannitol‐treated podocytes (Fig F and G). Knockdown and overexpression of KDM6A in podocytes further supported the notion that increased KDM6A expression critically contributed to podocyte dysfunction, showing decreased levels of nephrin, WT‐1 (another podocyte‐specific protein), and H3K37me3, as well as increased levels of DNA methylation at the nephrin promoter (Fig A–D). Consistently, treatment with a KDM6A inhibitor, GSK‐J4, halted HG‐induced reduction of nephrin, WT‐1 and H3K27me3 expression (Fig E) and HG‐induced DNA methylation at the nephrin promoter (Fig F). Collectively, our results highlighted that increased KDM6A expression endangers podocyte function.
Elucidating the role of KDM6A in diabetes‐induced kidney injury
We next investigated the in vivo expression and significance of KDM6A in diabetic kidneys using a streptozotocin (STZ)‐induced mouse model. We indeed found that higher levels of KDM6A, accompanied by lower levels of nephrin, WT1 and H3K27me3, were significantly expressed in kidney tissues of the 4‐, 8‐, and 12‐week diabetic mice relative to normal mice (Fig A and B). In these STZ‐treated mice, several important signs of diabetic nephropathy including elevated levels of urinary protein excretion, relative kidney weights, and HbA1c were observed (Fig C and D). Importantly, based on the immunofluorescence analysis of kidney sections from normal mice and the 4‐, 8‐ and 12‐week diabetic mice (Appendix Fig S2A), we evidently found that both increased KDM6A expression and reduced nephrin expression were closely associated with the presence of proteinuria in the 4‐, 8‐, and 12‐week diabetic mice (Appendix Fig S2B). To further support the importance of KDM6A in promoting diabetic kidney injury, GSK‐J4 was applied to treat diabetic mice. Treatment with GSK‐J4 significantly ameliorated diabetic urinary total protein release, kidney weight index, and urinary albumin leakage (Fig D and Appendix Fig S3A), as well as attenuated diabetes‐induced apoptosis of glomerular cells (TUNEL assay; Appendix Fig S3B). These results suggested that KDM6A plays a pivotal role in promoting diabetic kidney disease. We further found that GSK‐J4 treatment restored levels of nephrin, WT1, and H3K27me3 expression in STZ‐induced diabetic kidney tissues (Fig E). Intriguingly, although GSK‐J4 was considered to inhibit KDM6A demethylase activity (Kruidenier et al, ), we unexpectedly observed that GSK‐J4 treatment also diminished KDM6A levels in diabetic kidney tissues as detected by immunoblotting (Fig E) or by immunofluorescence analysis (Fig F). These findings were supported further by examining the primary podocytes isolated from the above‐treated mice (Fig G). The primary podocytes isolated from diabetic mice displayed abundant KDM6A expression and abnormal cell morphologies with the flattened, well‐spread, and rounded cell shape (Herman‐Edelstein et al, ), whereas podocytes isolated from GSK‐J4‐treated diabetic mice showed normal podocyte morphology with lower levels of KDM6A expression (Fig G). Since inactivation of KDM6A enzymatic activity by GSK‐J4 in diabetic mice led to the reduction in KDM6A levels, we speculated that KDM6A might regulate its own expression through a positive feedback loop under diabetic conditions.
Phenotypic characterization of podocyte‐specific knockout of KDM6A in mice
To further study the in vivo contribution of KDM6A to podocyte dysfunction, we generated podocyte‐specific KDM6A‐knockout (KDM6A‐KO) mice by crossing transgenic podocin‐Cre mice with KDM6flox mice. In addition to KDM6A genotype analysis (Appendix Fig S4), the mRNA and protein expression of KDM6A in kidney glomeruli or podocytes isolated from KDM6A‐KO mice were verified by quantitative RT–PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively (Fig A and B). All KDM6A‐KO mice were viable and fertile under normal conditions. Following treatment with STZ, we found that there were no significant differences in body weights or blood glucose levels between wild‐type and KDM6A‐KO mice during the 8‐week experimental period (Fig C). Consistently, there was also no difference in levels of HbA1c, a common marker for long‐term glycemic control, between diabetic wild‐type mice and diabetic KDM6A‐KO mice (Fig D). However, proteinuria and kidney weights were significantly lower in diabetic KDM6A‐KO mice than in diabetic wild‐type mice (Figs D and EV1A–C), indicating that knockout of KDM6A in podocytes protected against diabetes‐induced kidney injury. Additionally, as compared to diabetic wild‐type mice, we found that diabetic KDM6A‐KO mice exhibited lower apoptotic cell numbers in glomeruli (TUNEL assay; Fig EV1D), lower ranges of glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness (electron microscopy; Fig EV1E), and less glomerular fibrosis (periodic acid–Schiff stain; Fig EV1F). Immunofluorescence analysis of kidney tissues also revealed that both nephrin and H3K27me3 were maintained at higher levels in diabetic KDM6A‐KO mice relative to diabetic wild‐type mice (Fig E and F). Furthermore, podocytes isolated from KDM6A‐KO mice with diabetes retained normal morphological characteristics (Fig G) and exhibited normal levels of nephrin and WT‐1 expression (Fig H). To further compare differences between wild‐type and KDM6A‐KO podocytes, the isolated primary podocytes were cultured in medium containing either normal or high glucose. We found that HG treatment decreased the expression levels of nephrin, WT‐1 and podocin only in wild‐type podocytes, but not in KDM6A‐KO podocytes (Fig I). Since the transcription factor Snail was previously implicated in the repression of nephrin in podocytes (Matsui et al, ), the association between KDM6A and Snail in regulating nephrin expression was also examined (Fig. I). However, we did not find a correlation between Snail expression and KDM6A‐mediated nephrin down‐regulation in the experiments. Based on these results, we conclude that targeting KDM6A in podocytes could attenuate diabetes‐induced kidney injury.
Involvement of KLF10 in KDM6A‐mediated podocyte dysfunction
To elucidate the mechanism by which KDM6A triggered podocyte dysfunction, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq) analysis of total RNAs extracted from primary podocytes that were infected with a control lentiviral vector or a lentiviral vector encoding KDM6A. From three independent experiments, up to 800 genes with more than twofold differential expression (P < 0.05) were found in KDM6A‐overexpressing podocytes. Due to the complexity of these KDM6A‐regulated genes, we focused our attention on transcriptional factors potentially involved in the control of nephrin gene expression (Beltcheva et al, , ; Guo et al, ; Cohen et al, ; Matsui et al, ; Rascle et al, ; Ristola et al, , ; Huang et al, ). From 86 selected genes (50 activators/repressors, 20 co‐repressors, and 16 co‐activators), only 6 genes (including KLF10, KLF6, ETS1, KLF2, C/EBPα, and HDAC9) were identified with significant differences in responding to KDM6A overexpression (Fig A). Among these 6 transcription factors, KDM6A up‐regulated KLF10, KLF6, and ETS1, but down‐regulated KLF2, C/EBPα, and HDAC9 (Fig A). Notably, KLF10 is the most up‐regulated gene in the 86 selected genes and its association with kidney disease is not yet known. KLF10 was originally identified as a TGF‐β‐inducible early gene 1 (TIEG) in human osteoblasts and often functions as a transcriptional repressor involved in multiple cellular processes (Subramaniam et al, , ; McConnell & Yang, ; Yang et al, ). We therefore decided to further investigate the role of KLF10 in podocyte injury. Increased KLF10 expression was confirmed in primary cultured podocytes with KDM6A overexpression or with HG treatment (Fig B and C). Importantly, knockdown of KLF10 in primary podocytes significantly inhibited HG‐mediated reduction of nephrin (Fig D), indicating that KLF10 acts as a negative regulator of nephrin expression. Surprisingly, we noticed that KLF10 knockdown also resulted in the reduction of KDM6A expression in HG‐treated podocytes (Fig D).
In our mouse models, increased KLF10 expression along with reduced nephrin expression was observed by immunofluorescence analysis in diabetic kidney tissues (Fig E and F). Particularly, pharmacological inhibition or podocyte‐specific knockout of KDM6A substantially prevented KLF10 up‐regulation in diabetic kidney tissues (Fig E and F), supporting that KLF10 is a downstream effector of KDM6A. Similar results were also obtained when KLF10 expression was determined by immunoblotting using primary podocytes isolated from the above‐treated mice (Fig G and H). To investigate whether KLF10 directly modulated nephrin gene expression, we performed electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), supershift assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on nephrin gene promoter (Figs I and EV2). In mouse nephrin gene promoter, there are two evolutionarily conserved regions located from −188 to −270 (83‐bp; WT‐1 binding) and from −1,870 to −2,106 (237‐bp; Sp1 binding), which are essential for podocyte‐specific expression (Guo et al, ; Beltcheva et al, ). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiments showed that KLF10 directly bound to the promoter element from −1,893 to −1,931 (Fig EV2), a region previously identified as an SP‐1 binding site in the nephrin promoter (Beltcheva et al, ). ChIP assays also demonstrated enhanced binding of KLF10 to the nephrin promoter region from −2,052 to −1,753 or from −1,802 to −1,553, along with Dnmt1 (but not Dnmt3), in primary podocytes cultured in HG (Fig I). When KLF10 was overexpressed in primary cultured podocytes, we observed that all tested podocyte‐specific markers, including nephrin, WT1, podocin, and synaptopodin, were repressed (Fig J); however, KDM6A expression could be conversely activated (Fig J). These results strongly suggested that KLF10 could have multiple actions in promoting podocyte dysfunction.
Protection from diabetes‐induced podocyte injury in KLF10‐knockout mice
To further study the function of KLF10 in kidney disease, we used KLF10‐KO mice as described previously (Yang et al, ). Expression of KLF10 in kidney tissues of KLF10‐KO mice was confirmed in our laboratory (Fig A and B). Following treatment with STZ, we found that KLF10 depletion significantly protected mice against diabetes‐induced proteinuria (urinary excretion of total protein and albumin), glomerular cell apoptosis, GBM thickening, and even renal fibrosis (Figs C and D, and EV3). This was further supported by the findings that nephrin expression in kidney tissues did not significantly change between the STZ‐treated KLF10‐KO mice and the untreated wild‐type or untreated KLF10‐KO mice (Fig E). Intriguingly, when the expression levels of KDM6A were examined, we found that diabetic induction could not increase KDM6A expression in kidney tissues or primary podocytes isolated from KLF10‐KO mice as determined by immunofluorescence or by immunoblotting (Fig F–I). These results supported that KLF10 might conversely regulate KDM6A expression in vivo under diabetic conditions. Since KLF10 is a key TGF‐β‐inducible early growth response gene, we treated podocytes with TGF‐β1 to further study the relationship between KLF10 and KDM6A. After treatment with TGF‐β1, both KLF10 and KDM6A could be activated simultaneously, along with reduced expression of nephrin and WT‐1 (Fig J). However, when KLF10 was knocked down in TGF‐β1‐treated podocytes, we noticed that KDM6A expression was also concomitantly reduced (Fig J). Taken together, our findings suggested KDM6A and KLF10 positively regulate each other's expression in podocytes under stress conditions (Fig K).
To further determine the interlink between KDM6A and KLF10 in mediating podocyte dysfunction, immortalized mouse podocytes overexpressing KDM6A in combination with KLF10 knockdown (Fig EV4A) or podocytes overexpressing KLF10 in combination with KDM6A knockdown (Fig EV4B) were subjected to Western blot analysis for the expression levels of nephrin and WT‐1. In these experiments, we found that down‐regulation of nephrin and WT‐1 was closely correlated with increased KLF10, but not increased KDM6A (Fig EV4A and B), indicating that KLF10 plays a dominant role in regulating podocyte‐specific marker proteins. Additionally, due to the fact that TGF‐β1 is a multifunctional cytokine critically involved in podocyte dysfunction, the potential action of TGF‐β1 in the inter‐regulation between KDM6A and KLF10 was investigated (Fig EV5). We here showed that inhibition of TGF‐β1 with a neutralizing antibody (10 μg/ml) was able to block HG‐mediated up‐regulation of KDM6A and KLF10, and down‐regulation of nephrin and WT‐1 in podocytes (Fig EV5A). However, addition of the same amount of anti‐TGF‐β1 neutralizing antibody in KDM6A‐ or KLF10‐overexpressing podocytes could not influence the expression of their downstream targets including nephrin, WT‐1 and KLF10 or KDM6A (Fig EV5B and C). These results indicated that although TGF‐β1 is an important stimulator for the KDM6A–KLF10 positive feedback loop, it is not essential for mediating the positive inter‐regulation between KDM6A and KLF10 (Fig EV5D).
Increased levels of KDM6 and KLF10 in kidney tissues or urinary exosomes of human patients with diabetic nephropathy
When human nephrectomy tissue samples from patients with or without diabetic nephropathy (n = 6 for each group) were examined by immunofluorescence or by immunoblotting, we consistently found that increased levels of KDM6A and KLF10, accompanied by reduced levels of nephrin and WT‐1, were significantly detected in kidney tissues of diabetic nephropathy patients as compared to control subjects (Fig A and B). Moreover, to further confirm our study findings, we attempted to examine levels of KDM6A, KLF10, and nephrin mRNAs in urinary exosomes of control subjects and patients with diabetic nephropathy (n = 12 for each group). The baseline characteristics of study participants are shown in Appendix Table S12. Quantitative analysis of mRNA contents in human urinary exosomes also showed that higher levels of exosomal KDM6A and KLF10 mRNAs, accompanied by lower levels of nephrin mRNA, were significantly observed in diabetic nephropathy subjects than in control subjects (Fig C).
Discussion
Despite extensive efforts, there are not enough therapeutic interventions in preventing the progression of diabetic nephropathy, suggesting that additional detrimental pathways for diabetic nephropathy need to be further explored. In this report, we present a reinforcing feedback loop that involves KDM6A and KLF10 in podocytes, critically promoting podocyte dysfunction under diabetic conditions. Inactivation of KDM6A and KLF10 in mice can significantly protect against diabetes‐induced proteinuria and kidney injury.
According to the findings from the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) and Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications (EDIC) studies (Colagiuri et al, ; Writing Team for the Diabetes et al, ; Nathan et al, ), diabetic nephropathy can often persist and continue to enter end‐stage renal disease in diabetic patients even with intensive glucose control. The occurrence of a “metabolic memory” phenomenon in kidney cells may be attributed in part to epigenetic regulation. In our studies, we found that elevated KDM6A levels and reduced H3K27me3 levels, together with a significant decrease in nephrin, were consistently detected in podocytes in vitro and in vivo under hyperglycemic conditions. Our findings are generally consistent with the previous study by Majumder et al (), which showed the involvement of KDM6A in podocyte dedifferentiation. Besides, we here provide at least four additional pieces of information to further support the importance of KDM6A in promoting podocyte dysfunction. First, podocyte‐specific knockout of KDM6A in mice substantially protects against diabetes‐induced proteinuria and kidney injury. Second, knockout of KDM6A in podocytes prevents HG‐induced podocyte dysfunction in vitro. Third, increased KDM6A in podocytes sufficiently suppresses numerous podocyte differentiation markers and promotes a positive feedback loop to maintain its high‐level expression under diabetic conditions. Fourth, elevated levels of KDM6A protein or mRNA could be also observed in kidney tissues or in urinary exosomes of human diabetic nephropathy patients as compared to controls.
In addition to the H3K37me2/3 demethylating function, KDM6A has been proposed to have demethylase‐independent functions in the regulation of gene expression through interacting with other transcriptional regulators (Van der Meulen et al, ; Ezponda et al, ). KDM6A can be a component of MLL2 complex, a histone H3K4 methyltransferase complex (Van der Meulen et al, ). The dynamic interplay of H3K27me2/3 demethylation and H3K4 methylation, in couple with chromatin remodeling by the BRG1‐containing SWI/SNF complex and with H3K27 acetylation by HATs (e.g., CBP), may profoundly promote chromatin relaxation and activate specific gene activation. Despite the possible interactions between KDM6A and various histone‐modifying enzymes, we currently do not know whether the demethylase‐independent action of KDM6A plays a role in the regulation of KLF10 or other downstream targets that are potentially involved in podocyte dysfunction. Notably, Majumder et al () have also presented that loss of the repressive H3K27me3 mark in podocytes either by down‐regulation of EZH2 or by overexpression of KDM6A triggered activation of the Notch ligand Jag1 and the subsequent Notch signaling pathway. However, in our RNA‐Seq analysis, we did not detect significant changes in mRNA levels of Jag1 and other Notch receptors (fold change with a cutoff of 2, P < 0.05) in podocytes overexpressing KDM6A. These results suggest that some subtle changes may be not evidently discernible in the RNA‐Seq experiments and more research and validation studies are required for determining these subtle changes in podocytes.
To find out which of the expression changes in RNA‐Seq experiments are the most important causes of podocyte dysfunction, we focused our attention on transcriptional factors involved in the regulation of nephrin expression and found that KLF10 is a candidate target. There are currently a total of 27 SP/KLF family members identified in mouse or human, which include nine members of the SP subfamily (SP1–SP9) and 18 members of the KLF subfamily (KLF1–KLF18; McConnell & Yang, ; Bialkowska et al, ; Memon & Lee, ). Due to the structural similarities in the SP/KLF DNA‐binding domains at their C‐terminal regions and the diverse functional (transactivation/repression) domains at their N‐terminal regions, the SP/KLF members may have overlapping sets of target genes but display diverse influences on target gene expression. By comparing the expression profiling of all 17 KLFs (KLF18 not included) in three RNA‐Seq datasets, we found that KLF members including KLF1, KLF8, KLF12, KLF14, KLF15, and KLF17 were expressed at very low (or undetectable) levels in podocytes with or without KDM6A overexpression. Among the other KLFs, KLF10 is the most significantly up‐regulated gene in response to KDM6A overexpression. KLF10 was originally identified as a TGF‐β‐inducible early gene product in human osteoblast cells (Subramaniam et al, ). In addition to TGF‐β, KLF10 could be induced by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), estrogen, nerve growth factor, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) depending on cell types and environmental conditions (Subramaniam et al, ; Memon & Lee, ). Although several KLF members including KLF2, KLF4, KLF6, and KLF15 in glomerular endothelial cells or podocytes have been linked to kidney diseases, all these reported KLF members serve as renal protectors (Mallipattu et al, , , ; Hayashi et al, , ; Zhong et al, , ). To date, KLF10 is the only SP/KLF member that endangers podocyte function.
Multiple actions of KLF10 in podocyte dysfunction or injury can be proposed. First, KLF10 can directly bind nephrin gene promoter along with the recruitment of Dnmt1 to repress nephrin expression. Particularly, our results revealed that one of KLF10‐binding sites in the nephrin gene promoter is known as a previously identified SP1‐binding site located in the evolutionarily conserved promoter region. Notably, studies by Hayashi et al (, ) have previously shown that mutually exclusive binding of KLF4 (a transcriptional activator) and Dnmt1 to the nephrin gene promoter resulted in activation and repression of nephrin expression, respectively. Based on these previous studies and our present study, we here propose that SP1 and KLF4 act as transcriptional activators of the nephrin gene promoter, whereas KLF10 and Dnmt1 function as transcriptional repressors of the nephrin gene promoter. Second, in addition to the repression of nephrin expression, overexpression of KLF10 can also suppress other podocyte‐specific genes such as WT1, podocin, and synaptopodin in podocytes. Currently, it remains unclear whether the repression of these genes by KLF10 is mediated through direct binding of KLF10 to these gene promoters. Third, many studies have shown that KLF10 overexpression mimics anti‐proliferative effect of TGF‐β and induces cell apoptosis in various cell types (Ribeiro et al, ; Johnsen et al, ; Jin et al, ). Therefore, it could be possible that induction of podocyte dysfunction by KLF10 may be partly due to its anti‐proliferative and pro‐apoptotic activities. Fourth, KLF10 can conversely activate KDM6A, thereby promoting global epigenetic reprogramming and leading to aberrant gene expression. Intriguingly, although previous studies have reported that some abnormalities such as in the microarchitecture and mechanical properties of tendons could be observed in KLF10‐deficient mice (Bensamoun et al, ,b; Haddad et al, ; Gumez et al, ), we here found that KLF10‐KO mice actually had a normal lifespan and displayed grossly normal phenotype relative to wild‐type mice under basal conditions. These findings suggest that KLF10 can be an excellent therapeutic target in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy because its down‐regulation may not cause serious long‐term side effects.
In conclusion, our study presents a new deleterious positive feedback regulation that involves KDM6A and KLF10 in podocytes under diabetic conditions, which may facilitate the induction of irreversible kidney injury. Moreover, in contrast to the previously reported KLFs that act to protect kidney from damage, we here show that KLF10 has a unique role in promoting kidney dysfunction. These findings may open avenues for therapeutic manipulation in attenuating diabetes‐induced kidney injury.
Materials and Methods
Cell cultures, reagents, and transfections
Conditionally immortalized mouse podocyte cell line (Mundel et al, ), which harbors a thermosensitive variant of SV40‐T antigen, was growth in RPMI‐1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and interferon‐gamma (50 U/ml) at 33°C as described previously (Lin et al, ). To stimulate cell differentiation, the culture temperature was shifted from 33 to 37°C for 8 days. Primary podocytes isolated from mice were cultured in RPMI‐1640 supplemented with 10% FBS. To mimic a hyperglycemic condition, immortalized mouse podocytes or primary mouse podocytes (5 × 105 cells/well, 6‐well plate) were cultured in high glucose (30 mM), and mannitol served as an osmotic control for high glucose. Additionally, 500 or 1,000 nM of pargyline hydrochloride (P8013; Sigma), 40 μM of GSK‐J4 (4594; Tocris Bioscience, UK), and 5 ng/ml of TGF‐β1 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) were used for all indicated experiments. Transfection experiments were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instruction (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Methylation‐specific PCR
Genomic DNA was isolated from cultured podocytes using DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen Hilden, Germany). One microgram of genomic DNA was bisulfite converted using EpiTect Fast Bisulfite Conversion kit (Qiagen Hilden, Germany). To assess the methylation status of nephrin gene promoter, the unmethylated‐specific (U) primers including 5′‐GGTTGGAAGATTTTATGTTTTTGA and 5′‐CAAACAACTACCCTAAACATCCATA and the methylated‐specific (M) primers including 5′‐GTTGGAAGATTTTATGTTTTCGA and 5′‐GAACAACTACCCTAAACATCCGTA were used in PCRs. The PCR reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 80 ng of bisulfite‐treated DNA and 0.5 μM of each primer in 1X EpiTect Master mix. PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min; then 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; finally 72°C for 10 min.
Knockdown and overexpression of KDM6A or KLF10 in cultured podocytes
To knock down KDM6A expression in cultured podocytes, cells were transfected with 50 nM of double‐stranded KDM6A siRNAs (s75838; Ambion) with sense sequence 5′‐GGACUUGCAGCACGAAUUATT. Scrambled siRNAs were used as a negative control in the corresponding transfection experiments. To overexpress KDM6A in podocytes, the KDM6A expression plasmid (EX‐Mm05980‐Lv183; GeneCopodia, Rockville, MD) was used in transfection experiments. KLF10 siRNA (s75138; Ambion) with sense sequence 5′‐CGUCCAGAGUAAGAAGUCA was used for knockdown of KLF10 in podocytes, whereas the expression plasmid encoding KLF10 (CD513B‐KLF10; System Biosciences) was used for KLF10 overexpression in podocytes.
Protein extraction and Western blot analysis
Protein extracts from cultured cells or kidney tissues were prepared and manipulated according to our previously described protocols (Lin et al, ). Kidney tissues (100–150 mg) were ground in liquid nitrogen with pestle and mortar, homogenized by ultrasonication, and extracted using tissue protein extraction reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method (Bio‐Rad) with bovine serum albumin as standard. Equal amounts of protein extracts were separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). After electrophoresis, the proteins in the gel were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio‐Rad) and subjected to immunoblotting with primary antibodies. Antibodies against nephrin (PA5‐20330; Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:2,000 dilution), KDM6A (sc‐514859; Santa Cruz; 1:100 dilution), WT‐1 (sc7385; Santa Cruz; 1:750 dilution), H3K27me1 (#7693; Cell Signaling; 1:1,000 dilution), H3K27me2 (#9728; Cell Signaling; 1:1,000 dilution), H3K27me3 (#9733; Cell Signaling; 1:1,000 dilution), Pan‐methyl‐H3K9 (#4473; Cell Signaling; 1:1,000 dilution), actin (#4970s; Cell Signaling; 1:5,000 dilution), podocin (P0372; Sigma; 1:1,000 dilution), Snail (ab180714; Abcam; 1:1,000 dilution), KLF10 (ab73537; Abcam; 1:1,000 dilution), and synaptopodin (sc51584100; Santa Cruz; 1:1,000 dilution) were obtained commercially. Subsequently, these membranes were probed with a goat anti‐rabbit IgG‐HRP antibody (sc‐2004; Santa Cruz; 1:1,000 dilution) or goat anti‐mouse IgG‐HRP antibody (sc‐2005; Santa Cruz; 1:1,000 dilution), and then immersed with chemiluminescent detection reagents (Pierce) followed by visualized on Hyperfilm ECL film.
RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription (RT)‐PCR
Extraction of total RNAs from cultured cells or tissues using QIAzol reagent (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) or Tri reagent (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One microgram of total RNA was reverse‐transcribed with ReverAid™ M‐MuLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas) to allow synthesis of first‐strand cDNA. PCR mixtures (25 μl) containing cDNA template equivalent to 20 ng total RNA, 2.5 μM of specific primer pairs, and 2X iQ™ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) were prepared and subject to PCR amplification using the iCycler iQ® Real‐time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad). The specific primer pairs used for amplification of KDM6A, nephrin, WT‐1, KLF10, and actin cDNAs were designed using MIT Primer3 software (
Diabetic animal models and GSK‐J4 treatment
Three‐month‐old male C57BL/6 mice (BioLasco Biotechnology Co., Taiwan) were intraperitoneally given 190 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ) to induce diabetes. Each diabetic mouse was given 1–2 unit/kg insulin to equalize blood glucose levels as described previously (Lin et al, ). Mice with postfasting blood glucose (200–300 mg/dl) were considered as diabetes. For in vivo administration of GSK‐J4 (4594; Tocris Bioscience, UK), mice were treated daily with 0.4 mg/kg by subcutaneous injection at 1 week after diabetes induction. Normal or diabetic mice were sacrificed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (n = 8 for each) after diabetes. All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (No. 2015061902) and were performed according to the Animal Protection Law by the Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan (R.O.C) and the guideline of Nation Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). Animal experiments were performed at the Laboratory Animal Center, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi. The Laboratory Animal Center is accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) and has a full‐time veterinarian. Animals were housed in a room with constant temperature (20–25°C) and humidity (40–60%) under a 12‐h light/dark cycle. Mice cages were limited to 2 mice per cage, and animals were given free access to food and water.
Podocyte‐specific KDM6A knockout mice and KLF10 knockout mice
To generate knockout of KDM6A specific in podocytes of mice, transgenic podocin‐Cre mice [129S6.Cg‐Tg(NPHS2‐cre)259Lbh/BroJ; The Jackson Laboratory] were crossed with KDM6flox mice (B6; 129S‐Kdm6 atm1.1Kaig; The Jackson Laboratory) to generate podocin‐Cre/KDM6Aflox mice, designated as KDM6A‐KO mice in the study. The genotype of the generated KDM6A‐KO mice was verified by PCR analysis, and the expression of KDM6A in kidney glomeruli or in podocytes was confirmed by using quantitative RT–PCR or Western blot analysis. All KDM6A‐KO mice were viable and fertile under normal conditions. KLF10‐KO mice (Yang et al, ) were kindly provided by Dr. Vincent H.S. Chang (Taipei Medical University, Taiwan), and the genotype and expression of KLF10 in knockout mice were confirmed in our laboratory. All homozygous KLF10‐KO mice used in the experiments had a mixed genetic background between B6129 and C57BL/6 over 7 generations. For animal studies, wild‐type or knockout mice were randomly allocated to experimental groups.
Isolation of glomeruli and podocytes
Mouse glomeruli were isolated using the magnetic bead method described by Takemoto et al (). Briefly, mice were perfused with Dynabeads (M‐450)‐containing saline through the heart, which resulted in accumulation of Dynabeads in glomerular vessels. Kidneys were then minced into small pieces, digested by collagenase, and filtered through a 100‐mesh sterile stainless sieve. Glomeruli trapped by Dynabeads were isolated and gathered by a magnetic particle concentrator. In certain experiments, primary podocytes were further isolated according to the previously reported protocol (Golos et al, ). Briefly, isolated glomeruli were incubated in flask containing RPMI 1640 for 7 days. Outgrowing epithelial cells, which correspond to podocytes, were trypsinized, filtered through a 33‐μm sieve, and then cultured in RPMI1640 with 10% FBS at 37°C. Substantial expression of podocyte‐specific markers such as Wilms’ tumor‐1 protein (WT‐1) and nephrin was confirmed in the isolated primary podocytes.
Urine and blood biochemistry
Urine excretion of each animal was collected using a metabolic cage system. Levels of total protein in urine were measured using the respective kits as described previously (Lin et al, ). Serum hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose level in peripheral blood were measured according to the manufacturer's instructions (Primus Diagnostics, Kansas, MO).
Immunofluorescence
Immunofluorescence staining of the 5‐micron‐thick kidney sections or cultured podocytes grown on coverslips was performed as described previously (Lin et al, ). The cultured podocytes on coverslips were fixed in ice‐cold trichloroacetic acid for 15 min, or PBS with 4% paraformaldehyde and 4% sucrose for 10 min. Cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X‐100 for 10 min, blocked in 10% BSA in PBS for 1 h, and incubated with specific primary antibodies, and then with appropriate fluorophore‐conjugated secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies against nephrin (AF3159; R&D Systems; 1:250 dilution), KDM6A (ABE409F; Millipore; 1:500 dilution), WT‐1 (sc7385; Santa Cruz; 1:250 dilution), F‐actin (A12379; Invitrogen; 1:1,000 dilution), H3K27me3 (#9733; Cell Signaling; 1:500 dilution), KLF10 (ab73537; Abcam; 1:250 dilution), and human KLF10 (MA5‐20125; Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:250 dilution) were purchased commercially. Secondary antibodies, including donkey anti‐goat IgG H&L (DyLight® 488) (ab96931; Abcam), donkey anti‐mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488) (A21202; Invitrogen), goat anti‐rabbit IgG H&L (DyLight® 488) (ab96883; Abcam), goat anti‐rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 594) (ab150080; Abcam), and goat anti‐mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 594) (ab150116; Abcam), were used at 1:250 dilution. Cells were incubated briefly in 4′‐ 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI, Molecular Probes) for nuclei visualization. To quantify the fluorescence intensities of labeled proteins in glomeruli, glomerular areas in kidney sections were routinely discriminated by the unique globular morphology of glomeruli viewed in bright field together with the DAPI‐positive staining observed under the same fluorescent microscope settings. Glomerular areas in kidney sections were subsequently marked, and the mean fluorescence intensity per cell within the areas was quantified using the CellSens software package (Olympus).
RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq) analyses
Total RNAs were prepared from primary podocytes that were infected with control lentiviruses (LPP‐NEG‐Lv183‐050; GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD) or KDM6A‐encoding lentiviruses (LPP‐Mm05980‐Lv183‐050; GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD) for 48 h. The isolated RNAs were then used for whole‐genome RNA next‐generation sequencing (RNA‐Seq) and analysis performed by Welgene Biotech Co., Ltd (Taipei, Taiwan). Briefly, RNAs were first extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The purified RNAs were quantified at OD260 nm using a ND‐1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technology, USA) and qualified using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technology, USA) with RNA 6000 LabChip kit (Agilent Technology, USA). All procedures for library preparation and sequencing were performed according to the Illumina protocol. Library construction was carried out using the TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit for 75‐bp single‐end sequencing on Solexa platform. The sequence was directly determined by sequencing‐by‐synthesis technology via the TruSeq SBS kit (Illumina Inc., USA). Raw sequences were obtained from the Illumina Pipeline software bcl2fastq v2.0, which was expected to generate 30 million reads per sample. Qualified reads after filtering low‐quality data were analyzed using TopHat/Cufflink. Quantification for gene expression was calculated as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). For differential expression analysis, CummeRbund (Illumina Inc., USA) was used to perform statistical analysis of the gene expression profiles. The reference genome and gene annotations were retrieved from the Ensembl database.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assay was performed using the EZ‐Magna ChIP A/G kit (17‐10086; Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, sonicated chromatin complexes were immunoprecipitated using antibodies to KLF10 (ab73537; Abcam; 10 μg per reaction), acetyl‐histone H4 (06‐866; Millipore; 10 μg per reaction), Dnmt1 (ab13537; Abcam; 10 μg per reaction), and Dnmt3 (ab2850; Abcam; 10 μg per reaction). DNA fragments in the immunoprecipitates were extracted and subjected to quantitative PCR analysis. The PCR primers used in the study were as follows: 5′‐CTGGCAGGCAGGGAGGGAGG and 5′‐TGCAGCCTGCAAGGCTTCTC for the nephrin promoter region (−2,052/−1,753); 5′‐AGGGGGATAGTTCAGACTTC and 5′‐GAGGCCTCCTAGGACTCTCT for the nephrin promoter region (−1,802/−1,553).
Human kidney tissue samples
Patients with unilateral renal masses suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (six subjects with diabetic nephropathy and the other six subjects without diabetes) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy and gave their informed consent to participate in the study. The unaffected normal surrounding renal tissues from these patients were obtained from Tissue Bank, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi. All tissue samples were stored at −80°C until use. This study was approved by our local ethic committee (IRB2015061902). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, and the experiments performed with the samples conformed to the principles set out in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki and the Department of Health and Human Services Belmont Report.
Human urinary exosomal RNA isolation and analysis
Urine exosome RNA was isolated from 5 ml of human cell‐free urine using SeraMir Exosome RNA Purification Kit for Urine (RA806TC‐1; System Biosciences). Briefly, 1 ml of ExoQuick‐TC solution was added to urine samples and mixed gently. After incubation for at 4° for 6 h, the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 2 min, and the supernatant was removed by aspiration. Exosomes in the pellet were lysed, and then, RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instruction. The individual primer sequences used in quantitative RT–PCR included the following: 5′‐ATGGAA ACGTACCTTACCTG and 5′‐ATTAGGACCTGCCGAATGTG for KDM6A; 5′‐TCACATCTGTAGCCACCCAGGATG and 5′‐CTTTCCAGCTACAGCTGAAAGGCT for KLF10; 5′‐TCACTACCCCAGGTCTCCAC and 5′‐CCCTGCCTCTGTCTTCTCTG for nephrin; 5′‐GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT and 5′‐CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG for 18S rRNA. Relative mRNA levels in urinary exosomes were normalized to 18S rRNA.
Statistical analyses
All values were expressed as mean ± SEM. In vitro experimental data were collected from at least three independent experiments. Wilcoxon two‐sample test was used to evaluate differences between the sample of interest and its respective control. Parametric ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the differences among various treated groups. Data collection and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Data availability
RNA‐seq data from this study have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database and assigned the identifier accession number
Acknowledgements
We greatly appreciate Vincent H.S Chang (Taipei Medical University) for providing KLF10 knockout mice. We acknowledge Sun‐Sen Yang (National Defense Medical Center) for discussing the generation of knockout mice and for technical assistance. We thank Laboratory Animal Center, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, and National Laboratory Animal Center for animal breeding and sample preparation. We acknowledge Tissue Bank, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi for providing human tissue specimens and urinary samples from subjects with diabetes or non‐diabetes. The work was supported by MOST grants 104‐2314‐B‐182A‐068‐MY3 and 107‐2314‐B‐182A‐029‐MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan and by medical research grants CMRPG6E0381~3 and CMRPG6H0361 from Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.
Author contributions
C‐LL, Y‐CH, and P‐JC designed and performed experiments, and wrote the paper; Y‐TH and Y‐HS contributed to data analysis; C‐LL, Y‐TH, and Y‐HS participated in formulating aspects of study design relating to knockout mice; W‐CC and C‐JW contributed to the interpretation of data and manuscript revision.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The paper explained
Problem
Podocyte dysfunction is causally related to the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Despite extensive efforts, there are not enough therapeutic interventions in preventing the progression of diabetic nephropathy, suggesting that additional detrimental pathways for diabetic nephropathy need to be further elucidated. Although a large body of experimental evidence has revealed that epigenetic reprogramming could be a major contributor to podocyte dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy, the detailed linkage between the global epigenetic reprogramming and the resultant signal transduction in podocytes under diabetic conditions remains obscure.
Results
The major findings from the present study include the following: (i) KDM6A, a histone lysine demethylase, is up‐regulated in high glucose‐treated podocytes and in podocytes of diabetic mice, causing podocyte dysfunction in vitro and in vivo; (ii) podocyte‐specific knockout of KDM6A in mice significantly suppresses diabetes‐induced proteinuria and kidney injury; (iii) KDM6A aggravates diabetic podocyte dysfunction by creating a positive feedback loop through up‐regulation of a transcriptional factor KLF10; (iv) KLF10 acts as a key transcription repressor to inhibit multiple podocyte‐specific markers in podocytes; (v) KLF10 can conversely activate KDM6A expression; (vi) KLF10 inhibits nephrin expression by directly binding to the gene promoter along with the recruitment of methyltransferase Dnmt1; (vii) global knockout of KLF10 in mice protects against diabetic kidney injury; (viii) as compared to the control subjects, human diabetic nephropathy patients exhibit higher levels of KDM6A and KLF10 proteins or mRNAs in kidney tissues or in urinary exosomes.
Impact
Our findings highlight the importance of a reinforcing feedback mechanism involving KDM6A and KLF10 in promoting podocyte dysfunction under diabetic conditions and strongly suggest that targeting the KDM6A–KLF10 feedback loop may be beneficial to protect against diabetes‐induced proteinuria and kidney injury.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end‐stage renal disease. Although dysfunction of podocytes, also termed glomerular visceral epithelial cells, is critically associated with diabetic nephropathy, the mechanism underlying podocyte dysfunction still remains obscure. Here, we identify that
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Departments of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Kidney and Diabetic Complications Research Team (KDCRT), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
2 Departments of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Kidney and Diabetic Complications Research Team (KDCRT), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
3 Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Department of Medical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
4 Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
5 Departments of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Kidney and Diabetic Complications Research Team (KDCRT), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan