Nuclear corepressor SMRT is a strong regulator of body weight independently of its ability to regulate thyroid hormone action

Abstract

Silencing Mediator of Retinoid and Thyroid Hormone Receptors (SMRT) and the nuclear receptor co-repressor1 (NCoR1) are paralogs and regulate nuclear receptor (NR) function through the recruitment of a multiprotein complex that includes histone deacetylase activity. Previous genetic strategies which deleted SMRT in a specific tissue or which altered the interaction between SMRT and NRs have suggested that it may regulate adiposity and insulin sensitivity. However, the full role of SMRT in adult mice has been difficult to establish because its complete deletion during embryogenesis is lethal. To elucidate the specific roles of SMRT in mouse target tissues especially in the context of thyroid hormone (TH) signaling, we used a tamoxifen-inducible post-natal disruption strategy. We found that global SMRT deletion causes dramatic obesity even though mice were fed a standard chow diet and exhibited normal food intake. This weight gain was associated with a decrease in energy expenditure. Interestingly, the deletion of SMRT had no effect on TH action in any tissue but did regulate retinoic acid receptor (RAR) function in the liver. We also demonstrate that the deletion of SMRT leads to profound hepatic steatosis in the setting of obesity. This is unlike NCoR1 deletion, which results in hepatic steatosis due to the upregulation of lipogenic gene expression. Taken together, our data demonstrate that SMRT plays a unique and CoR specific role in the regulation of body weight and has no role in TH action. This raises the possibility that additional role of CoRs besides NCoR1 and SMRT may exist to regulate TH action.

About the Authors:

Hiroaki Shimizu

Contributed equally to this work with: Hiroaki Shimizu, Yu Lu

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-2854

Yu Lu

Contributed equally to this work with: Hiroaki Shimizu, Yu Lu

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Kristen R. Vella

Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America

Federico Damilano

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software

Affiliation: Division of Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Inna Astapova

Roles Investigation, Methodology

Affiliation: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Izuki Amano

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliations Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America

Megan Ritter

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

Affiliations Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America

Molly R. Gallop

Roles Data curation, Investigation

Affiliation: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Anthony N. Rosenzweig

Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision

Affiliation: Division of Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Ronald N. Cohen

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

Anthony N. Hollenberg

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America

Introduction

Nuclear receptor corepressors (CoRs) play important roles in the regulation of target gene transcription. While the function of CoRs was thought to be primarily subservient to the multiple nuclear receptors they interacted with recent studies have shown that CoRs themselves play larger roles in the specific regulation of DNA transcription and act as gatekeepers of homeostasis[1–3]. Classically, in the absence of ligand or the presence of a nuclear receptor (NR) -antagonist, CoRs bind to the NR and recruit a multi-protein complex that includes histone deacetylase3 (HDAC3), Upon the formation of CoR/NR/HDAC3 complex, HDAC3 is activated and represses gene transcription. However, many recent studies demonstrate that CoRs function in the both the presence and absence of agonist ligands and that the amount of CoR present actually determines the ligand-response. Indeed, the response to TH is dictated by the relative amount of functional CoR availability such that tissues become more responsive to TH in the absence of available CoR[4–6].

The two principal NR CoRs include Silencing Mediator for Retinoid and Thyroid Hormone Receptors (SMRT or NCoR2) and nuclear receptor corepressor1 (NCoR1). These paralogs are highly homologous though derived from separate genes[2]. Because they function as key transcriptional regulators, both have been genetically targeted in a variety of a models that have broadened the current understanding that both NCoR1 and SMRT function to regulate metabolic homeostasis[1, 7–9]. However, they clearly have distinct biological functions to regulate metabolism in target tissues[10, 11]. Indeed, our recent studies have demonstrated that NCoR1 plays a specific role in mediating TH action both in the liver and systemically whereas SMRT plays little to no role in TH action. However, a full analysis of SMRT’s role in TH action has been limited to the liver and the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis[11].

Visceral obesity, including hepatic steatosis, is defined by abnormal fat accumulation that can lead to insulin resistance, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic syndrome. Importantly, hepatic deletion of both NCoR1 function and SMRT leads to substantial hepatic steatosis demonstrating that both CoRs cooperatively act to suppress hepatic lipid synthesis. SMRT has a distinct role in suppressing specific retinoic acid receptor (RAR) target genes involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism[11]. A number of studies show possible anti-obesity effects of natural or artificial retinoid derivatives through the suppression of lipid accumulation in multiple tissues, which suggests an anti-obesity role for SMRT[12–15]. However, due to the embryonic lethality of SMRT, the mechanism by which global SMRT deletion affects both lipid metabolism and retinoid signaling in vivo has yet to be fully understood.

To investigate the physiologic roles of SMRT in global TH action and metabolism, we expanded on a tamoxifen-inducible whole-body gene deletion strategy that we used previously[11]. Here, we show that global deletion of SMRT in adult mice leads to the development of visceral obesity that is independent of a high fat diet or increased food intake. This phenotype is associated with the alteration of RAR signaling in target organs such as the liver but has no effect on TH-signaling. Interestingly, global SMRT deletion causes hepatic steatosis via the activation of the obesity seen rather than through the de novo activation of lipogenic gene transcription as is seen in the hepatic specific deletion of NCoR1. These data indicate that SMRT plays little role in global TH-signaling but appears to regulate a significant to-be-defined pathway that is critical to body weight regulation.

Materials and methods

Mice

To generate the mouse strain with a post-natal global deletion of SMRT (SMRTloxP/loxP UBC ERT2-Cre; UBC-SKO mice), we used the same strategy as previously described[11, 16]. All experimental mice were on a C57BL6/129Svj mixed background. Livers from UBC-NCoR1ΔID mice were isolated as described[16].

Animal experiments

All experiments were approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were single-cage housed in the BIDMC animal facility with a 12h light/dark cycle and supplied with standard chow diet except as indicated and water ad libitum. The experiments were performed in age- and sex-matched mice at 9 weeks of age unless otherwise specified. At this age, the UBC-SKO and SMRTloxP/loxP (control) animals were treated with tamoxifen (20mg/100g BW) for 5 days as described previously [11, 16], and remained on standard chow diet (F6 rodent diet 8664; Harlan Teklad). At the end of the studies (at 21 weeks of age for the 1st cohort of male mice, and at 24 weeks of age for both the 2nd cohort of male mice and the wild type male mice for cardiac ultrasound study, at 4 weeks for the 3rd cohort of male mice, and at 6 weeks for the female cohort of mice), all mice were sacrificed. Blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture. Tissues were rapidly collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. The level of recombination and extent of SMRT deletion was assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) after the mice were euthanized. Only UBC-SKO mice with expression levels of the SMRT gene less than 75% of that were found in control animals were included in the experimental analysis.

Western blotting

Protein lysates from target tissues and the samples for Western blot analysis were prepared as described previously[8, 11, 17]. Briefly, blots of 50 μg protein lysate were probed for SMRT-specific antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-SMRTe antibody, 06–891; Millipore) or NCoR1-specific (rabbit polyclonal anti-NCoR antibody, A301145A; Bethyl), and then appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies and visualized using ECL prime (GE Healthcare).

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

For mRNA expression analysis, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and qPCR were performed as described previously[11]. All mRNAs except Chrebpα, Chrebpβ, Srebp-1c were quantified using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems) and TaqMan Universal PCR master mix, No Amp Erase (Applied Biosystems), in a total volume 10 μl. Chrebpα, Chrebpβ, Srebp-1c　mRNA expression levels were quantified using Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) and previously published primers[18]. Relative mRNA levels of all genes were calculated using the standard-curve method and normalized to the level of cyclophilin A mRNA.

Cyclophilin A gene expression was assessed in all tissues of control and UBC-SKO mice (S2 Fig).

Liver triglycerides and cholesterol

Lipids were extracted by the method described by Folch et al[8, 11, 19]. Extracted triglyceride and cholesterol contents were normalized by wet liver weight.

Plasma lipids and hormone levels

Total serum cholesterol and triglycerides were measured using standard assays purchased from Stanbio Laboratory. Total plasma T4 (TT4) levels were measured using AccuDiag™ T4 ELISA Kit Cat# 3149–18 (Diagnostic Automation /Cortez Diagnostics, Inc. Calabasas, CA) in 25μl of serum, respectively. Circulating thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was also measured in plasma via Milliplex MAP Mouse Pituitary Magnetic Bead Panel Mouse TSH only; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA.

Metabolic phenotyping

Whole-body energy metabolism was evaluated using a Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbia Instruments). For 72 h measurements, mice were acclimated to the metabolic chambers for at least 48 hours to minimize stress from the housing change. CO2 and O2 levels were collected every 36 min for each mouse over the period of five experiment days. Energy Expenditure (EE), O2 consumption (VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and food intake measurements were collected. During this period, mice were maintained at approximately 22–24°C under 12 hours light, 12 hours dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum.

Core body temperature

Body temperature was measured weekly in the 2nd cohort of mice by a digital rectal thermometer (Physi Temp Thermo Alert model TH-5; Physiotemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ).

Food intake

A week prior to tamoxifen treatment, the 2nd cohort of mice were single-cage housed and the amount of weekly food intake was measured.

Body composition

4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment, mice were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using Echo MRI (Echo Medical Systems, Houston, TX) to determine body composition.

Echocardiography studies

Echocardiography was performed on awake mice of the 1st cohort using a Vivid 7 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, IL) equipped with i13L probe (14 MHZ), after a three-day training. Parasternal short-axis images were recorded using both M-mode and 2D-mode imaging at the level of papillary muscles. Images were analyzed off-line using EchoPACS software (GE Healthcare). The average of at least three measurements was used for every data point from each mouse. Fractional shortening percentage was calculated as (LVIDd-LVIDs)/LVIDd*100. LVIDd: left ventricle internal diameter, diastole; LVIDs: left ventricle internal diameter, systole.

Glucose tolerance test (GTT)

GTTs were performed on the mice 4 weeks and 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. Mice were fasted for approximately 14 hours in clean cages and their fasting blood glucose (FBG) was measured using a glucometer (OneTouch Ultra, Lifescan, Johnson & Johnson). Mice were then given an intraperitoneal injection of dextrose (1mg/g, Baxter Healthcare Corporation) and blood glucose was monitored over a 2 hour-time period.

Insulin tolerance test (ITT)

At least 1week after the GTT, ITTs were performed on the same mice. Briefly, the mice were fasted for 5 hours in clean cages and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were measured. Insulin (0.5 units/kg, Humulin R, Eli Lilly) was then injected intraperitoneally and blood glucose was measured over a 2 hour-time period.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Prism, Ver.6 program. All gene expression and hormonal analyses were performed on groups of 6–8 mice from each genotype. The differences in mRNA expression levels, serum glucose, hormone levels (insulin, leptin, TH and TSH), lipid profiles (triglycerides and total cholesterol concentration), and body composition were tested using unpaired Student’s t-test. Effects of tamoxifen treatment on different genotypes; such as BW, food intake, body core temperature, and results of cardiac ultrasound study were analyzed using Repeated Measures Two-way ANOVA with the Bonferoni post hoc test.

Results

Global SMRT deletion leads to obesity, glucose intolerance, and lower energy expenditure

To investigate the functional role of SMRT globally in all target organs and to avoid the embryonic lethality of the SMRT knockout mouse, we used a ubiquitously expressed tamoxifen-inducible Cre (UBCERT2-Cre) to disrupt SMRT postnatally[11, 16]. As shown in the representative study design, all mice were administrated tamoxifen between 8–10 weeks of age (S1A Fig). Starting 1 week before tamoxifen treatment, we measured body weight, core body temperature and food intake weekly. 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment, all mice were sacrificed. We confirmed that exon 11 of SMRT mRNA was deleted in a wide variety of tissues and that SMRT protein levels were minimally present in the heart, muscle and liver (Fig 1A). Starting 6 week after tamoxifen administration, UBC-SKO mice started to gain body weight on a standard chow diet with progressive development of obesity through the reminder of the experiment (Fig 1B). To exclude the possibility that the obesity of UBC-SKO mice (SMRTloxP/loxP UBCERT2-Cre) was caused by Cre-induced organ toxicity we set up a separate control mouse cohort comparing UBCERT2-Cre and Cre-negative littermates on a C57/BL6 background, which is more prone to obesity[20]. As shown S1B Fig, the administration of tamoxifen to UBCERT2-Cre and Cre-negative littermates did not increase body weight on a C57/BL6 background, indicating that the obese phenotype of UBC-SKO is specific to SMRT deletion (S1B Fig).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Global SMRT deletion leads to obesity, glucose intolerance, and lower energy expenditure.

(A) We used qPCR analyses to determine the level of Smrt exon 11 expression in the liver, heart, muscle, PGWAT, and BAT at 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. Also Western blot analysis was used to determine the levels of SMRT protein using a SMRT specific antibody in the 1st cohort of mice. Three samples were run in control mice (gray) and UBC-SKO mice (black). Blots were stripped and re-probed with anti-Pol-II as control. (B) Body weights in the 1st cohort of mice starting at Day0 of tamoxifen administration through 12 weeks. (C) Food intake and body temperature were measured weekly (2nd cohort). (D) We calculated the correlation between the levels of SMRT expression in the liver and body weight (2nd cohort). (E) Serum glucose, insulin, glucose tolerance tests, serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, and leptin were measured at 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (2nd cohort). (F) The 2nd cohort mice were placed in a CLAMS apparatus and monitored for oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide consumption (VCO2), and Respiratory-expiratory ratio (RER) over 72 hours. All data were normalized to body weight. (G) The weights of liver, PGWAT, SCWAT, and quadriceps were normalized to body weight in the 2nd cohort of mice. For qPCR data in panels A, and panels E-G (except the figure of the glucose tolerance test in panel E), the data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. In the analyses for BW (panel B), Food consumption (panel C), Body temperature (panel C), and glucose tolerance (panel E), Repeated Measures Two-way ANOVA was used. Results are shown as the mean±SEM, the p-value was shown as; ****, p< 0.0001; ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05. Panel D was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, and the p-value was shown as p = 0.022; *, p< 0.05. 1st cohort included n = 6–7 mice/group, and 2nd cohort included n = 6–8 mice/group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.g001

For further analysis of the obese phenotype, we set up a 2nd cohort of male mice. Indeed, UBC-SKO mice in this cohort became obese starting 6 weeks after tamoxifen treatment as well (S1C Fig). Importantly the development of obesity was independent of changes in food intake or body temperature (Fig 1C). qPCR analysis of gene expression in the liver showed that the extent of SMRT exon11 truncation has a significant negative correlation with BW (Fig 1D). Furthermore, UBC-SKO mice were glucose intolerant and had significantly higher concentrations of serum glucose as well as insulin 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment, consistent with insulin resistance (Fig 1E). Moreover, serum cholesterol was higher in UBC-SKO mice but serum triglyceride levels were comparable to control mice (Fig 1E). Additionally, UBC-SKO mice have a decrease of VCO2 and a slightly lower RER ratio compared with controls, indicating that they seem to have lower EE (Fig 1F). Consistent with this, UBC-SKO mice showed a profound obese phenotype with fatty liver and an increase in white adipose tissue (WAT); perigonadal WAT (PGWAT) and subcutaneous WAT (SCWAT). The decrease of quadriceps weight was also seen in UBC-SKO mice (Fig 1G).

To examine the mechanism of body weight regulation, we looked at serum leptin levels in UBC-SKO mice and resulting neuropeptide gene expression in the hypothalamus. As expected, the concentration of serum leptin in UBC-SKO mice was extremely high based on their fat mass (Fig 1E). However, mRNA levels of the gene encoding the orexigenic peptide; Agrp, and the gene encoding the anorexigenic peptide; α-MSH (Pomc) and its receptor; Mc4r were not different from controls consistent with central leptin resistance (S1D Fig).

Taken together, the global deletion of SMRT leads to significant obesity independent of a high fat diet or food intake.

Global SMRT deletion does not affect thyroid hormone action

To determine the effect of SMRT deletion on TH action in target tissues, we first analyzed the HPT axis in control and UBC-SKO mice. Previously, we demonstrated that serum T4 levels in UBC-SKO mice were comparable to controls 4 weeks after tamoxifen administration[11]. Herein, we demonstrate that T4 levels remain unchanged between UBC-SKO and control mice 12 weeks after tamoxifen administration (Fig 2A). Although there is significant increase in Tshβ subunit mRNA expression in UBC-SKO mice, there was no difference in the serum TSH concentration (Fig 2A). Furthermore, pituitary TR target genes such as Cga and Trhr were not different between the two genotypes (Fig 2A). These data indicate that whole-body SMRT deletion has a minimal effect on the HPT axis.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Global SMRT deletion does not affect the HPT axis or thyroid hormone action.

(A) Serum total T4 and TSH were measured, and gene expression of Cga, Tshβ subunit, and Trhr in the pituitary were quantified by qPCR in control and UBC-SKO male mice 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (1st and 2nd cohort). (B) mRNA expression levels of T3-target genes in the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and brown adipose tissue (BAT taken from 2nd cohort mice) were quantified by qPCR. (C) Heart rate (HR) was measured weekly by cardiac echocardiography in the 1st cohort mice weekly. For panels A and B, the data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Panel C was analyzed by Repeated-Measures Two-way ANOVA. Results are shown as the mean±SEM, and the p-values as; ****, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05. 1st cohort included n = 6–7 mice/group, and 2nd cohort included n = 6–8 mice/group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.g002

Next, we performed analysis of TR target gene expression in different TH target tissues. While a few specific genes such as Thrsp and Gpd2 were higher in the livers of UBC-SKO mice, a number of TR target genes (Dio1 and Bcl3) were not significantly up-regulated in the absence of SMRT (Fig 2B). Additional analysis of different TR target organs including the heart, muscle, and brown adipose tissue (BAT) showed that there was little difference in gene expression between the two genotypes in context of TR target genes (Fig 2B). We also performed cardiac ultrasound on these groups and showed that there was no difference in the heart rate (HR) between UBC-SKO and control mice, indicating that SMRT deletion has no effect on TH sensitivity in the heart in the context of heart rate (Fig 2C). Further cardiac echo analysis showed that left ventricular internal dimension diastole (LVIDd) of UBC-SKO mice was comparable with the control group. However, there was a lower % fractional shortening (%FS) in UBC-SKO mice (S1E Fig). Interestingly, we do not believe this effect is SMRT specific as changes were seen in fractional shortening in mice independent of the amount of SMRT deleted. Taken together, these data show whole-body SMRT deletion neither plays a functional role in TR target organs nor changes the HPT axis.

SMRT deletion actively enhances hepatic lipogenesis

For further analysis of organ function in the UBC-SKO mouse, we next focused on hepatic lipogenesis. Consistent with a heavier body weight UBC-SKO mouse had hepatomegaly, and hepatic lipid content was dominated by an accumulation of triglycerides (Fig 3A). Hepatic gene expression analysis showed that UBC-SKO mice had significant up-regulation of both lipogenic genes (Fasn, Acaca, and Scd1) and gluconeogenic-related genes (G6pase, and Pepck). Interestingly, the expression of Srebp-1c, which is a well-recognized transcription factor that regulates lipogenic genes, was significantly increased in the UBC-SKO mouse liver (Fig 3B). However, there was no change in the expression of the lipogenic transcription factors Chrebpα and Chrebpβ, which are regulated by the deletion of NCoR1 [11]. Analysis of lipogenic and gluconeogenic-related genes in PGWAT and muscle showed significant decreases in Pnpla2 and Pepck in PGWAT and Pnpla2 and Glut4 in the muscle, suggesting that the function of SMRT is tissue specific (Fig 3B). Indeed, the mRNA level of NCoR1 in the UBC-SKO liver was up-regulated suggesting NCoR1 works in a compensatory manner. However, there was no change in the protein levels of NCoR1 in the tissues tested (Fig 3C). Moreover, the qPCR assessment of reference gene expression in each tissue demonstrated that minimally higher levels of Cyclophilin-A were seen in liver, heart, and muscle in UBC-SKO mice and similar levels in pituitary and PGWAT which do not affect interpretation of mRNA expression (S2 Fig). These data indicate that SMRT plays a significant role as a suppressor of liver lipogenesis in an adult mouse, and the presence of NCoR1 does not seem to compensate for the hepatic steatosis seen with SMRT deletion.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. SMRT deletion actively enhances hepatic lipogenesis.

(A) Hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels were measured in the 1st cohort mice 12th weeks after tamoxifen treatment. Images of control and UBC-SKO mice the livers are shown. (B) The mRNA expression of lipogenic and gluconeogenic-related genes in the liver, PGWAT, and muscle (1st cohort of mice) (C) mRNA expression of NCoR1 in the liver, skeletal muscle, and PGWAT were quantified by qPCR. Protein expression of NCoR1 in the liver and heart were assessed by Western blot, using a NCoR1 specific antibody (n = 3–4 animals per group). Control samples are indicated by gray lanes and UBC-SKO mice are indicated by black lanes. For panel A and all qPCR analyses in panels B, and C, the data were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. These results are shown as the mean±SEM, and the p-values as; ****, p< 0.001; ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05 (1st cohort of mice, n = 6–7 mice/group).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.g003

Insulin resistance and fatty liver in UBC-SKO mouse are secondary to the progression of obesity

To better understand the mechanism that causes obesity in the UBC-SKO mouse, we generated a 3rd cohort of (young) male mice and observed them through 4 weeks post-tamoxifen administration. As shown in Fig 4A and 4B, there was no increase in body weight or hepatomegaly in the UBC-SKO mice three weeks after tamoxifen treatment in the 3rd cohort of mice (Fig 4A and 4B). Furthermore, MRI measurement of body composition showed that both lean mass and fat mass are similar between control mice and UBC-SKO mice (Fig 4C). Also, there were no differences detected in hepatic lipid composition, glucose tolerance, insulin tolerance, and leptin levels between UBC-SKO and control mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen administration (Fig 4D–4F). These data suggest that insulin resistance in male UBC-SKO mice is secondary to the progression of obesity.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Insulin resistance and fatty liver in UBC-SKO mouse occur secondary to the progression of obesity.

(A) Body weight of control and UBC-SKO mice were measured weekly for 3 weeks after tamoxifen treatment in the 3rd male cohort. (B) Liver weights in control and UBC-SKO of male mice (3rd cohort). (C) Body composition was measured via MRI in control and UBC-SKO male mice (3rd cohort). (D) Hepatic triglyceride and cholesterol levels were measured in both control and UBC-SKO male mice (3rd cohort). (E) Glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests were performed in male mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (3rd cohort). (F) Serum leptin levels were measured in both control and UBC-SKO male mice (3rd cohort). All results are shown as the mean±SEM. For panels A and E, Two-way Repeated-Measures ANOVA was used. For panels B, C, D, and F, the data were analyzed by unpaired t-test (3rd male cohort n = 7–8 mice/group).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.g004

To confirm that SMRT deletion has similar effects in females, we generated a female cohort of UBC-SKO mice. Beginning 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment, female UBC-SKO mice have a significant increase in body weight over control mice (S3A Fig). Female UBC-SKO mice have normal liver weight, lean mass, body fat percentage, hepatic triglycerides, hepatic total cholesterol, glucose tolerance, insulin tolerance and leptin levels (S3B–S3F Fig). Taken together, these data further support the conclusion that female UBC-SKO mice are also prone to obesity. However, to prove whether the development of insulin resistance and fatty liver in female UBC-SKO mice might be caused by obesity, the further analysis of an older female cohort will be needed.

To determine the effect of SMRT deletion on lipogenic and gluconeogenic-related gene expression prior to the onset of obesity, we analyzed various tissues in the 3rd male cohort (4 weeks post-tamoxifen) and female cohort (6 weeks post-tamoxifen). There were no differences in the expression of the vast majority of lipogenic and gluconeogenic genes in the livers of UBC-SKO and control mice in either cohort (S4A and S3B Figs). Interestingly, Dio1 expression was decreased in both males and females and Scd1 expression was slightly upregulated in females. While UBC-SKO mice had an increase in Pepck expression in SCWAT, other metabolic genes in SCWAT and PGWAT showed no difference between UBC-SKO and control mice in the 3rd cohort of male (S4C and S3D Figs). We also examined EE in these mice in the early weeks after tamoxifen treatment, and confirmed that there were no differences between UBC-SKO and control mice in either cohort in the both light and dark illumination cycle (S4E Fig). Additionally, TH levels were similar between UBC-SKO and control mice in the 3rd male cohort (S4F Fig). Thus, we can conclude that insulin resistance and alterations in lipogenic and gluconeogenic gene expression seen in the 1st and 2nd cohorts of male mice examined 12 weeks after tamoxifen injection occur secondary to obesity in the UBC-SKO mice.

Global SMRT deletion predominantly activates RAR signaling in the liver

Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that SMRT is preferentially recruited to RAR/RXR heterodimers[21, 22]. Similarly, in vivo, the deletion of SMRT in hepatocytes leads to the upregulation of specific RAR target genes (ex. Cyp26a1, RARβ)[11]. On the basis of these studies, we hypothesized that SMRT may play a dominant role in the regulation of RAR signaling globally. Thus we analyzed the expression of RA responsive genes in target tissues of the 1st male cohort 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. As shown in Fig 5A, a variety of RAR target genes responsible for retinoid transport and catabolism showed significantly higher expression in the UBC-SKO mouse liver (Fig 5A). Interestingly, the expression levels of the same genes in PGWAT of UBC-SKO mice were comparable to controls (Fig 5B). These data suggest that SMRT regulation of RAR signaling is organ specific.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Global deletion of SMRT predominantly activates RAR signaling in the liver.

(A) mRNA expression levels of the RAR signaling target genes in the liver of control and UBC-SKO mice 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment were quantified by qPCR. (B) mRNA expression levels of RAR signaling target genes in PGWAT of control and UBC-SKO mouse were assessed by qPCR. (C) mRNA expression levels of RAR signaling target genes in the liver of control and global NCoR mutant (UBC-NCoR1ΔID) mice were assessed by qPCR. For panels A, B, and C, all qPCR data were analyzed by an unpaired t-test. These results are shown as the mean±SEM. ****, p< 0.0001; ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01. The 1st cohort mice (n = 6–7 mice/group) were used in panels A and B, and UBC-NCoR1ΔID mice (n = 6–8 mice/group) were used in panel C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.g005

To determine if global NCoR1 disruption could also regulate RAR target genes we examined the livers from global NCoR1 mutant (UBC-NCoR1ΔID) mice[16]. This model expresses a hypomorphic NCoR1 allele that lacks the NR interacting domains. As expected, although there was higher Dhrs3 gene expression seen, the majority of the additional RAR responsive genes studied were similar in expression to control (NCoR1loxP/loxP) mice (Fig 5C). Thus, the remaining NCoR1 in UBC-SKO mice likely cannot be recruited to RAR target genes in the liver.

Discussion

Obesity has been recognized as world-wide public health concern and is highly linked to metabolic disorders including type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia[23]. Mechanistically obesity is secondary to genetic and/or environmental changes via three processes; 1) food intake 2) energy expenditure and 3) adipogenesis[24, 25]. In each of these processes, a variety of signaling pathways have been identified as playing a role. Included in these pathways are those governed and regulated by the NR superfamily. Indeed, NRs are recognized as therapeutic targets for metabolic disorders and their agonists are clinically approved for therapeutic use[26].

Previous studies have demonstrated that NR function is enhanced by increasing the sensitivity of the receptors to their endogenous ligand through alterations in co-regulator expression[9, 27]. Thus, NR action is changed by the balance of co-regulators, and the amount of CoRs and coactivators (CoAs) present. By using strategies that change the interaction between the NR and co-regulator complex, with or without ligand, the metabolic functions of CoAs have been clarified[3, 28]. On the other hand, the global function of CoRs in vivo has not been extensively studied because of embryonic lethality[29–31].

Previous studies analyzing the role of SMRT in vivo have focused on: 1. tissue-specific approaches; 2. have utilized altered SMRT alleles that impair their interactions with NRs or 3. studied mice haploinsuffcient for the SMRT allele. Each of these models has disclosed a role for SMRT in metabolism[7, 11, 32]. In particular both the mice haploinsufficient for SMRT and mice with a targeted disruption of the first receptor interaction domain (RID) of SMRT have developed obesity, hepatic steatosis, and insulin resistance, but their phenotype only manifested in the context of a high fat diet (HFD)[7, 32, 33]. Importantly, previous models of SMRT deletion demonstrated little role for SMRT in mediating the actions of TH[11]. This is in contrast to its paralog NCoR1. Thus, to further study the specific function of SMRT, we used a tamoxifen-inducible post-natal disruption strategy as previously described[11, 16]. Prior to the data presented herein we had used the same model to determine whether SMRT was required to regulate the HPT axis in a similar fashion to NCoR1[16].

Importantly, this model allows us to ablate SMRT without affecting viability of the animals because it is done at 9–10 weeks of age.

Strikingly, we found that the UBC-SKO mouse develops significant obesity associated with both insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, and slightly decreased EE. Although there is the possibility that overproduction of leptin from expanded adipose tissue may alter food intake, this was not the case and may also indicate that the phenotype is related to a central nervous system process that likely controls EE. This will require further study but is likely critical given the extent of the obesity seen in this model on a normal chow diet. Importantly, the phenotype is seen in both male and female mice but appears to develop slowly.

In addition to the obesity seen, UBC-SKO mice also demonstrated profound hepatic steatosis. Previous work in our lab and others has demonstrated the importance of NCoR1 in suppressing lipogenesis[8, 10, 11, 17, 34]. Indeed, when NCoR1 or HDAC3 is specifically deleted in hepatocytes a lipogenic program is activated leading to steatosis without evidence of insulin resistance or glucose intolerance. In contrast, the specific deletion of SMRT from hepatocytes does not activate lipogenesis. Furthermore, global SMRT deletion does not affect lipogenic gene expression (4 weeks post-tamoxifen treatment). Rather, these genes are altered after the development of obesity, hepatomegaly, and glucose intolerance (12 weeks post-tamoxifen treatment). Indeed, while the deletion of NCoR1 activates lipogenesis through direct derepression of lipogenic targets and potentially by the activation of Chrebp the deletion of SMRT has little effect on these targets[11, 17, 18, 35]. In contrast, the global deletion of SMRT leads to the eventual activation Srebp-1c, a lipogenic transcription factor regulated in an insulin dependent manner, which is consistent with the development of insulin resistance[36, 37].

The other significant aim of these studies was to determine whether SMRT plays a role in the regulation of TH responsiveness in target tissues. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that NCoR1 preferentially regulates the TRβ isoform, which raises the possibility that SMRT interacts mainly with TRα in tissues such as the heart or skeletal muscle[6, 8, 16, 17, 38]. However, as demonstrated here, heart rate is not altered in mice that lack SMRT. Similarly, there was no evidence of activation of gene expression in other TRα signaling tissues such as skeletal muscle or brown adipose tissue. Thus, unlike NCoR1, SMRT appears to play little role in regulating the sensitivity of TH-responsive signaling pathways to TH. It remains to be determined whether an alternative CoR plays a role in these other tissues.

In contrast to its lack of action in regulating the response to TH, SMRT again showed a preference for RAR signaling. Indeed, we found higher expression of retinoid catabolic enzymes (ex. Aldha1, Rdh10, Dhrs3, and Cyp26a1) in the mouse liver of UBC-SKO mice, suggesting that retinoid catabolism seems to be enhanced by SMRT-deletion. This would be consistent with SMRT playing a role in RA-sensitivity at least in the liver. A recent report also showed that SMRT similarly activates RAR signaling in vertebral and axial development[31, 39]. It also remains possible that the increased sensitivity to RA seen in the liver could affect the obese phenotype seen. In previous studies, mice racking retinaldehyde dehydrogenase (Raldh; Aldh) were lean and had improved insulin sensitivity[40, 41]. These studies indicate the possibility that retinoid metabolites regulate adipogenesis and glucose metabolism. Measurement of tissue retinoid concentrations using LC-MS as well as the effects of RAR antagonists in SMRT-deficient mice will be needed to determine whether this hypothesis warrants further investigation.

In summary, the data presented herein demonstrate a unique and profound role for SMRT in body weight regulation. Determining the pathways involved will be critical as it remains possible that HDAC3 inhibition could lead to weight gain in the pharmacologic setting. Surprisingly, SMRT plays little role in TH action in any target cell type tested. These data raise the possibility that additional CoRs besides NCoR1 and SMRT may exist to regulate the in vivo actions of TH.

Supporting information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. The global deletion of SMRT in vivo causes obesity without any effect on cardiac function.

(A) A schematic representation of study design: tamoxifen treatments were performed in all mouse cohorts between 9–10 weeks of age. CLAMS studies were performed 3-4weeks (3rd male and female cohort), 4–5 weeks (1st and 2nd cohort), and 9–10 weeks (1st and 2nd cohort) after tamoxifen treatment. (B) Body weights were measured weekly in both wild type (WT) and WT-Cre male mice for 12 weeks following tamoxifen treatment (n = 6–8 mice/ group). (C) Body weights were measured weekly in control and UBC-SKO mice (2nd cohort). (D) Gene expression of Smrt, NCoR1-3’, Pomc, Mc4r, and Agrp in the hypothalamus were quantified by qPCR in control and UBC-SKO male mice at 12 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (2nd cohort mice). (E) Analyses of LVIDd, % fractional shortening (%FS), and heart rate (HR) using cardiac echocardiography were performed on control and UBC-SKO mice (upper panels, 1st cohort) and WT and WT-Cre (lower panels, n = 6–8 mice). For panels B, C and E, Two-way Repeated-Measures ANOVA was used, and for panel D, all qPCR data were analyzed by an unpaired t-test. Results are shown as the mean±SEM and p-values are; ****, p< 0.0001; ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05. 1st cohort included n = 6–7 mice/group, and 2nd cohort included n = 6–8 mice/group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. The mean Ct value of Cyclophilin-A mRNA expression per tissue type.

The mean of CT value was analyzed by qPCR in each tissue. Data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Results are shown as the mean±SEM, and the p-values as; ****, p< 0.0001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05 (1st cohort, n = 6–7 mice/group).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Body weights increase in female UBC-SKO mice at 4 weeks of age.

(A) Body weights were measured weekly in female control and UBC-SKO mice 6 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. (B) Liver weights, (C) body composition, and (D) hepatic triglycerides and cholesterol levels were measured in control and UBC-SKO mice. (E) Glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests were performed in female mice at 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. (F) Serum leptin levels were measured in control and UBC-SKO mice 6 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. All results are shown as the mean±SEM. For panels A and E, Two-way Repeated-Measures ANOVA was used, and the p-value is; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05. For panels B, C, D, and F, the data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. The female cohort had n = 8–9 mice/group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. SMRT deletion does not affect gene expression, energy expenditure, and TH levels in the initial weeks after tamoxifen treatment.

(A) In male mice, liver gene expression was measured in control and UBC-SKO mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (3rd cohort). (B) In female mice, liver gene expression in control and UBC-SKO female mice was assessed by qPCR 6 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (female cohort). (C) In male mice, gene expression in SCWAT was measured in control and UBC-SKO mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (3rd cohort). (D) In male mice, gene expression in PGWAT was measured in control and UBC-SKO mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (3rd cohort). (E) Carbon dioxide production (VCO2), oxygen consumption (VO2) and RER were measured in male and female control and UBC-SKO mice 4 weeks after tamoxifen treatment (n = 4 mice/group). (F) In male mice, serum T4 and T3 levels were measured in control and UBC-SKO mice (3rd cohort). For panels A-F, the data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. All data were shown as the means±SEM, and the p-values were shown as; ****, p< 0.0001; ***, p< 0.001; **, p< 0.01; *, p< 0.05. The 3rd male cohort had n = 6–8 mice/group, and the female cohort had n = 8–9 mice/group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717.s004

(PDF)

Citation: Shimizu H, Lu Y, Vella KR, Damilano F, Astapova I, Amano I, et al. (2019) Nuclear corepressor SMRT is a strong regulator of body weight independently of its ability to regulate thyroid hormone action. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0220717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220717

References

1. Hollenberg AN. Metabolic health and nuclear-receptor sensitivity. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(14):1345–7. pmid:22475600.

2. Stanya KJ, Kao HY. New insights into the functions and regulation of the transcriptional corepressors SMRT and N-CoR. Cell Div. 2009;4:7. pmid:19383165

3. Astapova I. Role of co-regulators in metabolic and transcriptional actions of thyroid hormone. J Mol Endocrinol. 2016;56(3):73–97. pmid:26673411.

4. Martinez-Iglesias OA, Alonso-Merino E, Gomez-Rey S, Velasco-Martin JP, Martin Orozco R, Luengo E, et al. Autoregulatory loop of nuclear corepressor 1 expression controls invasion, tumor growth, and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(3):E328–37. pmid:26729869

5. Kiss M, Czimmerer Z, Nagy G, Bieniasz-Krzywiec P, Ehling M, Pap A, et al. Retinoid X receptor suppresses a metastasis-promoting transcriptional program in myeloid cells via a ligand-insensitive mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(40):10725–30. pmid:28923935

6. Mendoza A, Astapova I, Shimizu H, Gallop MR, Al-Sowaimel L, MacGowan SMD, et al. NCoR1-independent mechanism plays a role in the action of the unliganded thyroid hormone receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(40):E8458–E67. pmid:28923959

7. Sutanto MM, Ferguson KK, Sakuma H, Ye H, Brady MJ, Cohen RN. The silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) regulates adipose tissue accumulation and adipocyte insulin sensitivity in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(24):18485–95. pmid:20371609

8. Astapova I, Lee LJ, Morales C, Tauber S, Bilban M, Hollenberg AN. The nuclear corepressor, NCoR, regulates thyroid hormone action in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(49):19544–9. pmid:19052228

9. Yamamoto H, Williams EG, Mouchiroud L, Canto C, Fan W, Downes M, et al. NCoR1 is a conserved physiological modulator of muscle mass and oxidative function. Cell. 2011;147(4):827–39. pmid:22078881

10. Sun Z, Feng D, Fang B, Mullican SE, You SH, Lim HW, et al. Deacetylase-independent function of HDAC3 in transcription and metabolism requires nuclear receptor corepressor. Mol Cell. 2013;52(6):769–82. pmid:24268577

11. Shimizu H, Astapova I, Ye F, Bilban M, Cohen RN, Hollenberg AN. NCoR1 and SMRT play unique roles in thyroid hormone action in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(3):555–65. pmid:25421714

12. Trasino SE, Tang XH, Jessurun J, Gudas LJ. Retinoic acid receptor beta2 agonists restore glycaemic control in diabetes and reduce steatosis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(2):142–51. pmid:26462866

13. He Y, Gong L, Fang Y, Zhan Q, Liu HX, Lu Y, et al. The role of retinoic acid in hepatic lipid homeostasis defined by genomic binding and transcriptome profiling. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:575. pmid:23981290

14. Kim SC, Kim CK, Axe D, Cook A, Lee M, Li T, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid ameliorates hepatic steatosis in mice by a novel transcriptional cascade. Hepatology. 2014;59(5):1750–60. pmid:24038081

15. Amengual J, Ribot J, Bonet ML, Palou A. Retinoic acid treatment enhances lipid oxidation and inhibits lipid biosynthesis capacities in the liver of mice. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2010;25(6):657–66. pmid:20511711.

16. Costa-e-Sousa RH, Astapova I, Ye F, Wondisford FE, Hollenberg AN. The thyroid axis is regulated by NCoR1 via its actions in the pituitary. Endocrinology. 2012;153(10):5049–57. pmid:22878400

17. Astapova I, Ramadoss P, Costa-e-Sousa RH, Ye F, Holtz KA, Li Y, et al. Hepatic nuclear corepressor 1 regulates cholesterol absorption through a TRbeta1-governed pathway. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(5):1976–86. Epub 2014/04/10. pmid:24713658

18. Herman MA, Peroni OD, Villoria J, Schon MR, Abumrad NA, Bluher M, et al. A novel ChREBP isoform in adipose tissue regulates systemic glucose metabolism. Nature. 2012;484(7394):333–8. pmid:22466288

19. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226(1):497–509. pmid:13428781.

20. Davis J, Maillet M, Miano JM, Molkentin JD. Lost in transgenesis: a user’s guide for genetically manipulating the mouse in cardiac research. Circ Res. 2012;111(6):761–77. pmid:22935533

21. Cohen RN, Putney A, Wondisford FE, Hollenberg AN. The nuclear corepressors recognize distinct nuclear receptor complexes. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14(6):900–14. pmid:10847591.

22. Cohen RN, Brzostek S, Kim B, Chorev M, Wondisford FE, Hollenberg AN. The specificity of interactions between nuclear hormone receptors and corepressors is mediated by distinct amino acid sequences within the interacting domains. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15(7):1049–61. pmid:11435607.

23. Bray GA, Bellanger T. Epidemiology, trends, and morbidities of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Endocrine. 2006;29(1):109–17. pmid:16622298.

24. Palou A, Serra F, Bonet ML, Pico C. Obesity: molecular bases of a multifactorial problem. Eur J Nutr. 2000;39(4):127–44. pmid:11079733.

25. Sanchez-Gurmaches J, Guertin DA. Adipocytes arise from multiple lineages that are heterogeneously and dynamically distributed. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4099. pmid:24942009

26. Moore JT, Collins JL, Pearce KH. The nuclear receptor superfamily and drug discovery. ChemMedChem. 2006;1(5):504–23. pmid:16892386.

27. Li P, Fan W, Xu J, Lu M, Yamamoto H, Auwerx J, et al. Adipocyte NCoR knockout decreases PPARgamma phosphorylation and enhances PPARgamma activity and insulin sensitivity. Cell. 2011;147(4):815–26. pmid:22078880

28. Vella KR, Ramadoss P, Costa ESRH, Astapova I, Ye FD, Holtz KA, et al. Thyroid hormone signaling in vivo requires a balance between coactivators and corepressors. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34(9):1564–75. pmid:24550004

29. Jepsen K, Hermanson O, Onami TM, Gleiberman AS, Lunyak V, McEvilly RJ, et al. Combinatorial roles of the nuclear receptor corepressor in transcription and development. Cell. 2000;102(6):753–63. pmid:11030619.

30. Jepsen K, Gleiberman AS, Shi C, Simon DI, Rosenfeld MG. Cooperative regulation in development by SMRT and FOXP1. Genes Dev. 2008;22(6):740–5. pmid:18347093

31. Kumar S, Cunningham TJ, Duester G. Nuclear receptor corepressors Ncor1 and Ncor2 (Smrt) are required for retinoic acid-dependent repression of Fgf8 during somitogenesis. Dev Biol. 2016;418(1):204–15. pmid:27506116

32. Nofsinger RR, Li P, Hong SH, Jonker JW, Barish GD, Ying H, et al. SMRT repression of nuclear receptors controls the adipogenic set point and metabolic homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(50):20021–6. pmid:19066220

33. Fang S, Suh JM, Atkins AR, Hong SH, Leblanc M, Nofsinger RR, et al. Corepressor SMRT promotes oxidative phosphorylation in adipose tissue and protects against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(8):3412–7. pmid:21300871

34. You SH, Lim HW, Sun Z, Broache M, Won KJ, Lazar MA. Nuclear receptor co-repressors are required for the histone-deacetylase activity of HDAC3 in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(2):182–7. Epub 2013/01/08. pmid:23292142

35. Benhamed F, Denechaud PD, Lemoine M, Robichon C, Moldes M, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. The lipogenic transcription factor ChREBP dissociates hepatic steatosis from insulin resistance in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(6):2176–94. Epub 2012/05/02. pmid:22546860

36. Shimomura I, Matsuda M, Hammer RE, Bashmakov Y, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Decreased IRS-2 and increased SREBP-1c lead to mixed insulin resistance and sensitivity in livers of lipodystrophic and ob/ob mice. Mol Cell. 2000;6(1):77–86. Epub 2000/08/19. pmid:10949029.

37. Matsuzaka T, Shimano H, Yahagi N, Amemiya-Kudo M, Okazaki H, Tamura Y, et al. Insulin-independent induction of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c expression in the livers of streptozotocin-treated mice. Diabetes. 2004;53(3):560–9. Epub 2004/02/28. pmid:14988238.

38. Astapova I, Vella KR, Ramadoss P, Holtz KA, Rodwin BA, Liao XH, et al. The nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) controls thyroid hormone sensitivity and the set point of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(2):212–24. Epub 2011/01/18. pmid:21239618

39. Hong SH, Fang S, Lu BC, Nofsinger R, Kawakami Y, Castro GL, et al. Corepressor SMRT is required to maintain Hox transcriptional memory during somitogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(41):10381–6. Epub 2018/09/27. pmid:30254164

40. Ziouzenkova O, Orasanu G, Sharlach M, Akiyama TE, Berger JP, Viereck J, et al. Retinaldehyde represses adipogenesis and diet-induced obesity. Nat Med. 2007;13(6):695–702. pmid:17529981

41. Kiefer FW, Orasanu G, Nallamshetty S, Brown JD, Wang H, Luger P, et al. Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 coordinates hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism. Endocrinology. 2012;153(7):3089–99. pmid:22555438