It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soot particles form during combustion of carbonaceous materials and impact climate and air quality. When freshly emitted, they are typically fractal-like aggregates. After atmospheric aging, they can act as cloud condensation nuclei, and water condensation or evaporation restructure them to more compact aggregates, affecting their optical, aerodynamic, and surface properties. Here we survey the morphology of ambient soot particles from various locations and different environmental and aging conditions. We used electron microscopy and show extensive soot compaction after cloud processing. We further performed laboratory experiments to simulate atmospheric cloud processing under controlled conditions. We find that soot particles sampled after evaporating the cloud droplets, are significantly more compact than freshly emitted and interstitial soot, confirming that cloud processing, not just exposure to high humidity, compacts soot. Our findings have implications for how the radiative, surface, and aerodynamic properties, and the fate of soot particles are represented in numerical models.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 Atmospheric Sciences Program and Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
2 Atmospheric Sciences Program and Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
3 Atmospheric Sciences Program and Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
4 Atmospheric Sciences Program and Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA; Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Earth & Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
5 Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Rome, Italy
6 Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Rome, Italy; Department of Chemistry and Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
7 Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR-IMAA), Rome, Italy
8 School of Engineering - University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
9 Earth & Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
10 Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
11 Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA
12 Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
13 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
14 DNV GL, Høvik, Norway
15 Instituto de Investigação em Vulcanologia e Avaliação de Riscos – IVAR, University of Azores, Azores, Portugal