Introduction
Hypertension (HTN) is one of the strongest risk factors for sudden cardiac death (Murray and Lopez ). Chronic HTN affects 30–45% of the general population in Europe (Mancia et al. ) and more than 65 million adults in the United States, with nearly 5 million new diagnoses each year (Fields et al. ). HTN‐induced heart diseases are the leading causes of illness and death due to the secondary complications of high arterial blood pressure. Over time, HTN leads to left atrial dilation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and impaired ventricular relaxation (i.e., “diastolic dysfunction”), and thus, affecting ventricular systole and diastolic filling, results in an increased risk of heart failure (HF) (Lalande and Johnson ). In addition to adverse structural changes in the myocardium, chronically elevated blood pressure also negatively affects autonomic regulation of blood pressure (Julius and Valentini ), heart period dynamics (Bettermann et al. ), and electrophysiological properties of neural and myocardial tissues of the heart, causing progressive symptom expression and elicitation of spontaneous cardiac arrhythmias. It is well known that the presence and the complexities of arrhythmias significantly influence the morbidity, mortality, and quality of life of HTN patients (Ormaetxe et al. ; Almendral et al. ; Yildirir et al. ; Mancia et al. ).
Currently, the treatment of choice of physicians for patients suffering from HTN and HTN‐induced heart diseases is a regimen of antihypertensive drugs along with the adoption of appropriate dietary changes and a regular schedule of exercise (National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), ). While the aim of these treatments has been to control the rise in arterial blood pressure, it has been reported that only approximately 30–35% of patients have been shown to benefit from these treatments (Mancia et al. ). Resistant hypertension is defined as a lack of response to three or more antihypertensive drugs with over a fourfold greater risk of cardiovascular events compared with nonresistant hypertensive patients (Pierdomenico et al. ). Epstein reported that approximately 15% of his study population had resistant hypertension (Epstein ). As a result, there is a clear need for novel and effective alternative treatments for HTN and HTN‐induced heart diseases due to the large number of patients who remain resistant to antihypertensive drugs.
Device‐based approaches have been heavily considered as an effective alternative to alleviate the development of HTN and bypass some of the aforementioned issues. Several of these therapeutic device strategies act to reduce central sympathetic drive, as it is known that one cause of HTN is the inappropriate increase in sympathetic nervous activity (Sved et al. ; Guyenet ; Osborn et al. ). Device‐ and procedure‐based strategies in the treatment of hypertension target either a reduction in central sympathetic drive from peripheral chemoreceptors/mechanoreceptors (baroreceptor stimulation) or a reduction in renal sympathetic efferent signaling (renal sympathetic nerve ablation). However, these approaches overlooked the heart arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial, and ventricular ectopic beats) which commonly accompany chronic HTN.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has the capability of restoring autonomic nervous system regulatory function not only in the vascular system but also in the heart at its neural processing hierarchy (Armour ). While VNS is a clinically FDA‐approved therapy for depression and epilepsy, numerous studies have shown that it can be extended to treat cardiovascular diseases via its ability to modulate the parasympathetic nervous activity (Kunze ; Brack et al. ; Lazare ; Premchand et al. ). Our laboratory and others have shown that VNS is able to alter several electrophysiological properties of the heart, eventually suppressing arrhythmias and leading to an improved prognosis of HF rats, and significantly improve long‐term survival after chronic HF (Harman and Reeves ; Xie et al. ).
In this present study, we investigated for the first time the potential of VNS to be used as a novel device‐based therapy for HTN and HTN‐induced heart diseases. Specifically, we aimed to determine the effects of VNS on the evolution of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and arrhythmogenesis in vivo in a genetic model of HTN: the Dahl salt‐sensitive (DS) rat. In addition, at the end of the study, we investigated the effects of VNS on heart anatomy and electrophysiological properties through ex vivo high‐resolution optical mapping.
Experimental Setup
All procedures were approved by the University of Minnesota Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with Institutional and NIH guidelines.
Prophylactic antibiotic (gentamicin sulfate; 10 mg/kg, i.m.) was given prior to each surgery. During the surgeries, rats were anaesthetized with isoflurane (5% for induction, 2% or 3.5% for maintenance) in oxygen (2 L/min for induction, 1 L/min for maintenance). The rat's body temperature was maintained at 37°C on a temperature‐controlled surgery table.
Animal model protocol
DS male rats (n = 12, 5 weeks old) were used for the study. HTN was induced via 8% NaCl high salt diet (S10001, Research Diets, Inc., NJ, USA) and was maintained throughout the entire duration of the study (Fig. A). Vagus nerve stimulators (Cyberonics Model 103, Houston, TX, USA) and telemetry systems (HD‐S11, Data Sciences, Inc. (DSI), Minneapolis, MN, USA) were implanted at Week 5 of the study, and rats were randomly divided into two groups: HTN‐Sham (n = 6, with nonfunctional VNS stimulator implants of the same mass) and HTN‐VNS (n = 6, with functional VNS stimulator implants). At the end of Week 6 (Fig. A, “Day 0 VNS”), functional VNS stimulators were activated in the HTN‐VNS group, and real‐time bipolar electrograms and arterial blood pressure were recorded using DSI telemetry for both HTN‐VNS and HTN‐Sham groups for 4 weeks (Weeks 6 through 10).
Vagus nerve stimulator implantation
The VNS pulse generator and lead were implanted as described previously (Shinlapawittayatorn et al. ; Xie et al. ). Briefly, the back and the neck of the rat were shaved, and the right cervical vagus nerve and common carotid artery bundle were isolated from the surrounding tissue through a small incision on the neck. Bipolar cuff electrodes were placed around the bundle. The pulse generator (8 cc, 14 g) was implanted subcutaneously and positioned on the back of the rat. Parameters of the intermittent VNS were set as follows: pulse frequency 20 Hz; pulse width 500 μsec; output current 1.0 mA. The pulse generator was programmed using radio‐frequency telemetry to deliver continuously cyclic VNS: 7 sec ON and 66 sec OFF. Therefore, the duty cycle was 10%. Nonfunctional stimulators were implanted in HTN‐Sham group to provide the same mass (14 g).
DSI telemetry system implantation
The DSI transmitter implantation was performed as described previously (Veitenheimer and Osborn ). Briefly, the surgical regions (chest and inner leg) were shaved and the transmitter pressure catheter was implanted into the descending aorta via the left femoral artery through a small incision in the inguinal area. The two ECG leads were fixed subdermally on the chest muscle. Following recovery from surgery, rats were conscious and freely moving in their home cages for the duration of the in vivo study. Continuous arterial blood pressure and ECG data acquisitions were performed with the use of a commercially available telemetry system (DSI, Inc.). The real‐time bipolar electrograms and arterial blood pressure data were collected with a 500 Hz sampling rate. Each cage was placed on a receiver (model RPC1, DSI Inc.) that was connected to a computer via a Data Exchange Matrix (DSI Inc.).
Optical mapping
Upon completion of the in vivo protocol (Fig. A), rats were sacrificed for heart extraction through thoracotomy. The hearts were immersed in cold cardioplegic solution and Langendorff‐perfused with warm (37 ± 1°C) oxygenated Tyrode's solution as described in detail previously (Xie et al. ). After 30 min of stabilization, the voltage‐sensitive dye di‐4‐ANEPPS (5 μg/mL) was added to the perfusate. Two 532 nm green lasers (Millenia Pro 5sJ, Spectra‐Physics Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) were used to illuminate both the right (RV) and left ventricles (LV) of the heart, and fluorescence signal from more than 80% of total ventricular surface was captured with two 14‐bit CCD cameras (Little Joe CCD39, SciMeasure Analytical Systems, Inc., GA, USA), that ran synchronously at 1000 frames per second with 80 × 80 pixel resolution (the field of view was 12 × 12 mm). Blebbistatin (10–15 μM) was added to stop heart contractions and reduce motion artifacts.
Hearts were then paced periodically at progressively decreasing basic cycle length (BCL) from 200 ms in steps of 20 ms until BCL reached 90 ms or until ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) was initiated. At each BCL, 40 stimuli were applied to reach steady state. Optical mapping movies were recorded at steady state of each pacing BCL and during ventricular arrhythmias (VF/VT) from both LV and RV epicardial surfaces of the heart. The background fluorescence was subtracted from each frame, and spatial (3 × 3 pixels) and temporal (5 pixels) convolution filters were used.
Gross morphology and histology
Tibia length (TL)‐normalized heart weight (HW) was used to quantify the VNS effects on the cardiac structure to avoid the confounder induced by the fluctuations in body weight. The left leg of the rat was severed above the knee joint, and the muscle and skin of the tibia were removed by mechanical stripping. The length of the tibia from the condyles to the tip of the medial malleolus was measured using micrometer caliper. HW normalized by TL (HW/TL) was compared between HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS rats at the end of the study. The RV and LV free‐wall thickness was measured after optical mapping experiments to obtain an RV/LV wall thickness ratio to quantify hypertrophy in HTN hearts.
Data analysis
In vivo DSI telemetry system data analysis
Representative examples of simultaneously recorded ECG and arterial blood pressure traces obtained from the DSI telemetry system are shown in Figure B during VNS “ON” and “OFF” periods. Note the presence of small spikes on ECG traces (arrows) during VNS “ON” period associated with signal interference (Fig. B, top panel).
The ECG traces were used for the estimation of arrhythmia episodes using commercial software (Ponemah Life Science Suite, DSI Inc., MN, USA). Episodes of arrhythmias were counted at “Day 0 VNS” and at the end of study (Week 10) during the same time interval (4 h at night), and were presented as the number of episodes per hour per rat. Several types of arrhythmic events were observed: premature ventricular contraction (PVC), atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and skipping beats. PVC episodes were separated from all other arrhythmic events, as PVCs can occur in a healthy rat and pose less threat to the heart than the other types of arrhythmias.
From the arterial blood pressure traces, the following parameters were calculated using commercial software (Dataquest A.R.T., DSI Inc., MN, USA): heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressures (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and MAP, as indicated in Figure B. HRV was defined as , where is standard deviation, and is mean HR over a 24 h time interval. ΔHR was also calculated to determine the relative changes in HR over the duration of VNS therapy. ΔHR was defined as
where HRn is the HR at day n after VNS activation, and HR0 is the HR measured at “Day 0 VNS.” The relative changes in MAP were calculated as
where MAPn is the MAP at day n after VNS activation, and MAP0 is the MAP at “Day 0 VNS” (see Fig. A). The values for ΔMAP and ΔHR were calculated separately for 12 h of day (6 AM–6 PM) and 12 h of night (6 PM–6 AM) times.
Ex vivo optical mapping data analysis
Optical action potential durations (APD) were measured at 80% repolarization (APD80), and two‐dimensional (2D) APD maps were constructed to reveal the spatial distribution of APDs on both LV and RV epicardial surfaces. Mean APD was calculated at different BCLs for the visible RV and LV surfaces by averaging APDs from all pixels. The maximum slope of the APD restitution, Smax, was calculated at the smallest diastolic interval. 2D maps of Smax were constructed to reveal its spatial distribution and to calculate the mean value of Smax on the epicardial surface.
The spatial dispersion of APD was estimated based on the heterogeneity index
To measure the local conduction velocity (CV), the distributions of activation times (AT) for the spatial regions of 5 × 5 pixels were fitted with the plane, and gradients of ATs gx and gy were calculated for each plane along the x and y axes, respectively (Xie et al. ). The magnitude of the local CV was calculated for each pixel as (gx2 + gy2)−1/2.
During sustained VT/VF, optical movies were taken every 10 sec, and the first 3000 frames (3 sec) of each episode were used for VT/VF analysis. For each VT/VF episode, fast Fourier transform was applied to each pixel to obtain the power spectrum and to determine the distribution of frequencies in the range of 5–35 Hz. The dominant frequency (DF) was defined as the frequency corresponding to the highest peak in the power spectrum (Xie et al. ). 2D DF maps were constructed and used to determine the maximum DF (DFmax) on the epicardial surface, as well as the number of DF domains. The minimum size of the domain was considered to be 100 pixels with a resolution of 0.01 Hz between domains.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± standard error. Statistical comparisons between HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS rats were performed using ANOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
In vivo effect of VNS on blood pressure, ECG, and arrhythmias in HTN rats
Table shows in vivo blood pressure and ECG 24‐h mean parameters (MAP, PP, HR, and HRV) at Weeks 0, 6, 8, and 10 for all HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS rats. Table indicates that 6 weeks of high salt diet successfully induced HTN in both Sham and VNS groups, as indicated by significant increase in MAP and PP, as well as significant decrease in HR. Note that there were no significant differences between the groups in any parameter at either baseline or Week 6.
In vivo blood pressure and ECG parameters for the all HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS ratsWeek 0 (Baseline) | Week 6: Day 0 VNS (8% NaCl) | Week 8 (8% NaCl + VNS) | Week 10 (8% NaCl + VNS) | ||
HR (BPM) | HTN‐VNS | 436 ± 10 | 408 ± 10 | 421 ± 9 | 407 ± 3 |
HTN‐Sham | 442 ± 10 | 399 ± 7 | 380 ± 12 | 397 ± 9 | |
MAP (mmHg) | HTN‐VNS | 120 ± 3.5 | 157 ± 6.0 | 171 ± 10.4 | 179 ± 11.6 |
HTN‐Sham | 112 ± 2.5 | 155 ± 11.7 | 174 ± 10.0 | 200 ± 15.7 | |
PP (mmHg) | HTN‐VNS | 47 ± 2.8 | 56 ± 2.7 | 62 ± 3.0 | 60 ± 1.6 |
HTN‐Sham | 38 ± 5.7 | 59 ± 3.4 | 58 ± 4.0 | 61 ± 3.0 | |
HRV | HTN‐VNS | 0.091 ± 0.009 | 0.090 ± 0.007 | 0.097 ± 0.012 | 0.108 ± 0.021 |
HTN‐Sham | 0.099 ± 0.006 | 0.097 ± 0.009 | 0.119 ± 0.004 | 0.099 ± 0.015 |
3Denotes significance with respect to Week 0 (P < 0.05).
4Denotes significance with respect to Week 6 (P < 0.05).
5Denotes significance between HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS groups (P < 0.05).
Figure shows relative changes of 24‐h mean data for MAP (panel A), PP (panel B), and HR (panel C) with respect to baseline (Week 0) for both Sham and VNS groups. The data are shown at different times during VNS stimulation: Week 6 (“Day 0 VNS”), Weeks 8 and 10 (after 2 and 4 weeks of VNS, respectively). Figure shows that further development of HTN (Weeks 8 and 10 in comparison to Week 6) did not affect relative change in HR and PP, but significantly increased MAP in HTN‐Sham (see “†” in Fig. A) but not in HTN‐VNS group. Note that the relative changes in HR and PP are larger in HTN‐Sham group in comparison to HTN‐VNS group, although statistical significance is present only at some weeks (see “#” in Fig. B and C).
To further investigate the effect of VNS on MAP and HR, we calculated ΔMAP and ΔHR, which reflect relative change in MAP and HR at each day with respect to “Day 0 VNS.” Figure shows the change in ΔMAP (Panels A, B) and ΔHR (Panels C, D) for the entire duration of VNS stimulation separately for the day (6 AM–6 PM) and night (6 PM–6 AM) time periods, as rats were housed in rooms that have automatic controlled light–dark cycles. Figure A shows that long‐term VNS treatment attenuated the increase in ∆MAP during the daytime interval, where parasympathetic system is playing the dominant role in rats. This effect becomes statistically significant toward the end of the study (P < 0.05, see “#” in Fig. A). On the other hand, VNS has no significant effect on ∆MAP during night period (see Fig. B), where sympathetic activities are dominant. Figure C,D indicate that the ΔHR in both HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS groups has similar trend over time suggesting no chronic effect of VNS on HR, which is expected since the VNS ON time (duty cycle) was only 10%.
Lastly, we investigated the effects of VNS on the development of arrhythmias that are induced in rats as a result of HTN. Figure A shows simultaneous recordings of arterial blood pressure and ECG from an implantable DSI transmitter for HTN‐Sham rat, demonstrating examples of PVC (left) and atrial fibrillation (right). Similar types of abnormal cardiac behaviors were observed in HTN‐VNS, however, with a smaller number of instances. Figure B shows the total numbers of PVCs and arrhythmias episodes counted in both groups at Week 6 (“Day 0 VNS”) and Week 10. Note the reduction in both PVCs and other arrhythmic episodes (P < 0.05) in VNS rats, indicating the antiarrhythmic effects of VNS therapy in HTN rats.
Ex vivo effect of VNS on electrophysiological properties of the HTN hearts
Typical examples of 2D APD maps of the RV and LV of HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS rat hearts obtained at BCL = 200 ms are presented in Figure A, with corresponding traces of action potentials from a representative single pixels shown in Figure B. Mean APD80 calculated in both groups for various BCLs are presented in Figure C for RV (left panel) and LV (right panel). Note that VNS reduced APD in the RV, with significant reduction at BCLs 120, 140, and 160 ms, but not in the LV. In addition, the maximum slope of APD restitution curve (Smax) was significantly reduced in the RV but not in the LV as a result of VNS therapy, as indicated in Figure D.
To determine whether VNS affected the spatial dispersion of APD, we calculated the heterogeneity index μ separately for RV and LV at different BCL values. Figure A indicates that VNS significantly reduced μ in LV but not in RV at most BCLs.
To study whether VNS affected CV of action potential propagation, we constructed AT maps for both HTN‐Sham and HTN‐VNS groups at various BCLs. A representative example of AT maps at BCL = 180 ms is shown in Figure B, indicating normal propagation in the RV of both rat hearts. Figure C shows mean CV data at different BCLs for both groups indicating that VNS increased CV both in the RV and LV, although the effect is significant only at some BCLs.
To investigate the effect of VNS on dynamical behavior of ex vivo arrhythmias, we analyzed optical mapping movies from either spontaneous arrhythmias or the ones that were induced at the end of our pacing protocols. In all of our experiments, sustained VF was observed in all (6/6) HTN‐Sham rats, while sustained VT, but not VF, was observed in 4/6 HTN‐VNS rats. None (0/6) of the HTN‐VNS rats developed VF, suggesting that VNS provided protection against the development of VF. The analysis of the VT/VF dynamics is shown in Figure A–C. Figure A shows a representative example of 2D DF maps for RV of HTN‐VNS and HTN‐Sham hearts (top) with the single pixel traces (bottom) clearly indicating the presence of VT/VF. Figure B shows the DFmax and the number of DF domains. Note that the HTN‐Sham rats not only had more DF domains but also higher DFmax than the HTN‐VNS rats, indicating more complex dynamics of ex vivo cardiac arrhythmias. Figure B shows representative examples of phase movies during arrhythmias in HTN‐VNS and HTN‐Sham hearts (see supplemental material).
Lastly, we measured the heart weight/tibia length ratio (HW/TL) and RV/LV wall thickness ratio at the end of the study. Our results show that both parameters were similar in the HTN‐VNS (HW/TL: 0.38 ± 0.03; RV/LV: 0.32 ± 0.01) and HTN‐Sham (HW/TL: 0.42 ± 0.01; RV/LV: 0.30 ± 0.01, P = N/S) groups suggesting that 4 weeks of VNS did not induced structural remodeling of the HTN heart.
Discussion
Autonomic dysregulation is a feature of chronic heart failure and is characterized by a sustained abnormal elevation in sympathetic nerve activity and by withdrawal of parasympathetic activity (Bell and McLachlan ; Esler and Kaye ; Esler et al. ). Autonomic imbalance, which is reflected in reduced heart rate variability and reduced baroreflex sensitivity, is associated with worsening HF and increasing risk of mortality (La Rovere et al. ; Nolan et al. ). Modulation of parasympathetic activation with electrical stimulation is a potential therapy for HF, but has received limited attention because of its inherent complex cardiovascular effects (Gray et al. ; Hao et al. ; Hoeks et al. ). However, recent clinical studies have demonstrated the salutary effects of parasympathetic stimulation in HF (De Ferrari et al. ; Premchand et al. ).
In the present study, for the first time, we used a HTN rat model to characterize the effects of VNS on blood pressure and arrhythmia incidence, as well as the effects of VNS on the electrophysiological properties of the heart. Our results confirm that the VNS modulates the balance of the autonomic nervous system by promoting parasympathetic and decreasing sympathetic activity.
Our major findings are as follows: (1) 4 weeks of intermittent VNS attenuated the increase in MAP in HTN‐VNS rats as compared to HTN‐Sham rats; (2) VNS reduced the number of in vivo arrhythmic events, as well as the spatiotemporal complexity of ex vivo arrhythmias in HTN‐VNS rats as compared to HTN‐Sham rats; and (3) VNS induced beneficial changes in the electrophysiological properties of the heart, including a reduction in APD during rapid drive pacing, μ, and Smax, and an increase in CV. Overall, these results provide further evidence for the therapeutic efficacy of VNS in HTN and HTN‐related heart diseases.
The effect of VNS on blood pressure
Recent studies have shown that chronic electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus activates the baroreflex and reduces MAP by inhibiting central sympathetic outflow (Lohmeier et al. ; Sabbah ). This reduction on blood pressure is substantial, and is currently being used as a clinical therapy for refractory hypertension (Heusser et al. ; Bakris et al. ).
The present study shows that chronic VNS also causes an attenuation of MAP elevation during the spontaneous development of chronic HTN, likely through a similar mechanism. In our study, we accounted for the light–dark cycle of the rats. The rationale for day‐night separation is that the roles of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity are different when the rats are active (during the night) and at rest (during the day). At rest, parasympathetic activity predominates over sympathetic tone (Olshansky et al. ). Recently, it was demonstrated that the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems are involved in diurnal variation in heart rate‐corrected QT intervals (QTc) in rats (Honda et al. ). Specifically, the enhanced parasympathetic nervous activity during the night induces a slight but significant QTc prolongation. Our results show that VNS induced a more pronounced modulation of MAP during the daytime, when the nocturnal rats are less active, and suggest that VNS is more effective when parasympathetic nerve activity predominates and the sympathetic tone is reduced, that is, when the rat is asleep. This is an indirect indication that the parasympathetic nerve activity is impaired by HTN; and that VNS lowers MAP by enhancing parasympathetic nerve activity and restoring autonomic balance.
The antiarrhythmic effects of VNS
The antiarrhythmic effects of VNS in ischemic HF are shown in previous studies (Schwartz et al. ; Zuanetti et al. ; Vanoli et al. ). In this study, we demonstrate that VNS also has antiarrhythmic effects in HTN‐induced heart disease. VNS therapy significantly reduced the incidence of in vivo arrhythmias (tachycardia, bradycardia, and skipped beats) in HTN rats. In addition, our optical mapping results demonstrated that the complexity of spontaneous/induced ex vivo arrhythmias is significantly reduced in HTN‐VNS rats as compared to HTN‐Sham, which is further evidence of the antiarrhythmic effects of VNS treatment in HTN‐induced heart disease.
Antiarrhythmic effects were associated with significant VNS‐induced reduction in the APD and the slope of APD restitution (in RV), as well as the reduction in the spatial dispersion of APD and increase in CV (in LV) during rapid drive pacing. The electrophysiological changes that occurred due to VNS in LV are in contrast to the ones that were observed in most HF hearts. Reduction in CV and increase in μ have been shown to create an arrhythmogenic substrate that is able to promote the inception and preservation of reentrant arrhythmias (Qu et al. ; Banville and Gray ). In HF, conduction slowing has been linked to a decrease in expression of the gap‐junction protein Connexin‐43 (Dupont et al. ). Likewise, elevated Connexin‐43 expression is correlated with faster conduction in the myocardium (van Kempen et al. ). Short‐term VNS therapy has been previously shown to preserve the expression of gap‐junctional protein Connexin‐43 over the course of minutes after cardiac injury (Ando et al. ). Although we did not directly measure Connexin‐43 expression in the LV, our results seem to agree with this finding. All of these electrophysiological changes are likely to be the underlying mechanisms to the antiarrhythmic effects of VNS.
The exact mechanisms underlying the antiarrhythmic effects of VNS are still not well studied. One possible mechanism may be due to the activation of the vagus nitric oxide (NO) pathway, since direct stimulation of the vagus nerve releases NO through a neuronal NO synthase mechanism in the ventricle. Brack et al. previously demonstrated the important role of NO in mediating the protective effects of VNS in the rabbit hearts (Brack et al. , ). Another possible mechanism may involve reactive oxygen species (ROS). It is known that during myocardial injury, there is an increase in ROS production and oscillation of the mitochondrial membrane potential, which plays an important role in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias (Brown and O'Rourke ). Shinlapawittayatorn et al. have shown that VNS was able to stabilize cardiac mitochondrial membrane potential by protecting the depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential (Shinlapawittayatorn et al. ).
We should note that in our study, we only evaluated a limited number of spontaneous arrhythmic episodes, and therefore, arrhythmias were relatively scarce even in HTN‐SHAM rats. Another approach, such as stressing the heart using programmed stimulation, might have led to stronger results.
Mechanistic insights into chronic VNS therapy
At the cervical level, the vagus nerve contains a composite of myelinated A and B fibers, as well as unmyelinated C fibers, which are the most numerous (approximately 65% to 80%) (Foley and DuBois ). According to Woodbury et al. (Woodbury and Woodbury ), activation of C‐fibers requires higher stimulation amplitudes and longer pulse durations than the activation of myelinated A and B fibers. For instance, Zagon et al. (Zagon and Kemeny ) demonstrated that myelinated vagal fibers were activated in anesthetized rats at 100 μA (at 30 Hz, and a pulse width of 0.5 ms), while increasing current up to 200 μA activated nonmyelinated fibers. The stimulation parameters that have been used in our study (pulse width of 0.5 ms and current of 1.0 mA) suggest that both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers are stimulated. Similar level of stimulation will also engage the vagal motor fibers, especially the myelinated fibers, according to the study of Ben‐Menatchem et al. (Ben‐Menachem ). Future studies are needed to determine whether the therapeutic mechanism of VNS predominantly occurs through the afferent or efferent neural pathways.
Our results clearly demonstrate that VNS is capable of attenuating the high MAP and inducing antiarrhythmic effects in HTN, and provides evidence for VNS as an effective device‐based therapy for HTN and HTN‐induced heart disease. Our results also suggest that the therapeutic effects of VNS are associated with chronic treatment, rather than acute stimulation. Indeed, the beneficial effect of VNS on attenuating high MAP became significant after only 4 weeks of chronic VNS. Therefore, further evaluation of VNS as a clinical HTN therapy requires prolonged chronic stimulation.
In this manuscript, we reported the beneficial effects of VNS on blood pressure and arrhythmia in a HTN rat model, and we investigated the effect of VNS on several electrophysiological parameters. Nevertheless, more comprehensive evaluation is required to reveal the mechanisms by which VNS affects different in vivo and ex vivo electrophysiological and structural characteristics of rats. Our current study raised a number of questions that can help in designing these future experiments.
Our results demonstrated that VNS affected RV and LV in a slightly different ways. Indeed, VNS reduced APD and Smax only in RV, but increased CV and decreased APD spatial dispersion predominantly in LV. This suggests that different electrical remodeling of both ventricles takes place as a result of chronic VNS. On the other hand, our data do not suggest any anatomical remodeling of both ventricles. These results are somewhat intriguing since LV (but not RV) contractile properties are expected to be the main determinant of MAP. It is unclear whether RV/LV electrophysiological remodeling is accompanied by a remodeling of the corresponding extracellular matrix.
In addition, chronic VNS may also provide an anti‐inflammatory effect through the cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway. The neural signal that is sent from the efferent fibers in the vagus nerve can inhibit the release of cytokines, and release the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Cytokine‐producing cells contain acetylcholine receptors which transduce signals resulting in the inhibition of cytokine synthesis. By decreasing the level of cytokine synthesis, the magnitude of the inflammatory response is dampened (Tracey ). This effect was demonstrated by Zhang et al. by measuring the plasma C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (Zhang et al. ). Pacing‐induced heart failure promotes systemic inflammation and was shown to have increased plasma CRP. VNS treatment significantly reduced the plasma CRP.
Conflict of Interest
Drs. Libbus and KenKnight are employees of Cyberonics, Inc.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Hypertension (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
2 Cyberonics Inc., Houston, TX, USA
3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Cyberonics Inc., Houston, TX, USA
4 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA